On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?

--

Salmonbait

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?

--

Salmonbait


You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?

On Dec 21, 8:17*am, Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:47:53 -0500, D K
wrote:

Billgran wrote:
"John" wrote in message
...

I called the dealer. He said to connect the hose at the flushing
attachment, but not to let the engine get over idle speed.

If the dealer said to use the flusher hose and fitting under the motor's
powerhead, I'd be having a word with that dealer person. The Yamaha owners
manual, service manual, and training seminars state specifically NOT to run
the motor using it. Only run the motor with the "earmuff" type flushers
around the gearcase, preferably the dual hose feed style muffs.

Bill Grannis
service manager

I had to buy the double sided muffs for the 115 - the single doesn't cut
it. *The rectangular type seems to also work better than the round ones.
*Don't know about the 90 - it's hasn't seen sal****er yet.

I've got the double sided muffs, the best one's West Marine sells, with
water coming to both sides. Maybe the impeller's shot. Today I'm going to
put the engine in a big garbage can, fill the can with water and start the
engine. If I don't get some water from the 'pee hole' then I'll know
something's dicked up with the enging.
--

Salmonbait

Please have someone videotape your putting the engine in a big gargage can.

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:26:59 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?

--

Salmonbait


You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?

I wouldn't mention my conclusions, because I think you'd find them
personally insulting. I'm hoping you'll be man enough to prove my
conclusions wrong.
--

Salmonbait

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:26:59 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?
--

Salmonbait

You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?

I wouldn't mention my conclusions, because I think you'd find them
personally insulting. I'm hoping you'll be man enough to prove my
conclusions wrong.
--

Salmonbait


I'll be delighted to watch your progress in bringing the group around to
your way of thinking. If I notice any *positive* changes of significance
in the behaviors of those I haven't bozo-binned, I will gladly extend
them the same courtesy. This, of course, is precisely the "deal" I
offered previously.

No offense, but I have the feeling *you* think you have an ability to
cajole or negotiate me over to your position. I've told you many times I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less.

Now, perhaps you want to work on the others for a few weeks.

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:48:41 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:26:59 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?
--

Salmonbait

You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?

I wouldn't mention my conclusions, because I think you'd find them
personally insulting. I'm hoping you'll be man enough to prove my
conclusions wrong.
--

Salmonbait


I'll be delighted to watch your progress in bringing the group around to
your way of thinking. If I notice any *positive* changes of significance
in the behaviors of those I haven't bozo-binned, I will gladly extend
them the same courtesy. This, of course, is precisely the "deal" I
offered previously.

No offense, but I have the feeling *you* think you have an ability to
cajole or negotiate me over to your position. I've told you many times I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less.

Now, perhaps you want to work on the others for a few weeks.

Harry, have you forgotten already the post you made not two hours ago?

*******************************
38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a
tooth for a tooth: Ex. 21.24 · Lev. 24.20 · Deut. 19.21
39 but I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall
smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
**************************************

You hold this up as a standard, yet make a statement like, "I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less."

No offense, but don't you see just a little hypocrisy in that?
--

Salmonbait

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:48:41 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:26:59 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?
--

Salmonbait
You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?
I wouldn't mention my conclusions, because I think you'd find them
personally insulting. I'm hoping you'll be man enough to prove my
conclusions wrong.
--

Salmonbait

I'll be delighted to watch your progress in bringing the group around to
your way of thinking. If I notice any *positive* changes of significance
in the behaviors of those I haven't bozo-binned, I will gladly extend
them the same courtesy. This, of course, is precisely the "deal" I
offered previously.

No offense, but I have the feeling *you* think you have an ability to
cajole or negotiate me over to your position. I've told you many times I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less.

Now, perhaps you want to work on the others for a few weeks.

Harry, have you forgotten already the post you made not two hours ago?

*******************************
38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a
tooth for a tooth: Ex. 21.24 · Lev. 24.20 · Deut. 19.21
39 but I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall
smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
**************************************

You hold this up as a standard, yet make a statement like, "I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less."

No offense, but don't you see just a little hypocrisy in that?
--

Salmonbait


Jesus is your saviour, not mine.

Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:48:41 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:26:59 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater
wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?
--

Salmonbait
You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?
I wouldn't mention my conclusions, because I think you'd find them
personally insulting. I'm hoping you'll be man enough to prove my
conclusions wrong.
--

Salmonbait

I'll be delighted to watch your progress in bringing the group around
to your way of thinking. If I notice any *positive* changes of
significance in the behaviors of those I haven't bozo-binned, I will
gladly extend them the same courtesy. This, of course, is precisely
the "deal" I offered previously.

No offense, but I have the feeling *you* think you have an ability to
cajole or negotiate me over to your position. I've told you many
times I will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less.

Now, perhaps you want to work on the others for a few weeks.

Harry, have you forgotten already the post you made not two hours ago?

*******************************
38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and
a tooth for a tooth: Ex. 21.24 · Lev. 24.20 · Deut. 19.21
39 but I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever
shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
**************************************

You hold this up as a standard, yet make a statement like, "I will
treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less."

No offense, but don't you see just a little hypocrisy in that?
--

Salmonbait


Jesus is your saviour, not mine.

It depends upon who you ask.

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:48:41 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:26:59 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater
wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about
personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?
--

Salmonbait
You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating
yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?
I wouldn't mention my conclusions, because I think you'd find them
personally insulting. I'm hoping you'll be man enough to prove my
conclusions wrong.
--

Salmonbait

I'll be delighted to watch your progress in bringing the group
around to your way of thinking. If I notice any *positive* changes
of significance in the behaviors of those I haven't bozo-binned, I
will gladly extend them the same courtesy. This, of course, is
precisely the "deal" I offered previously.

No offense, but I have the feeling *you* think you have an ability
to cajole or negotiate me over to your position. I've told you many
times I will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less.

Now, perhaps you want to work on the others for a few weeks.

Harry, have you forgotten already the post you made not two hours ago?

*******************************
38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye,
and a tooth for a tooth: Ex. 21.24 · Lev. 24.20 · Deut. 19.21
39 but I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever
shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
**************************************

You hold this up as a standard, yet make a statement like, "I will
treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less."

No offense, but don't you see just a little hypocrisy in that?
--

Salmonbait


Jesus is your saviour, not mine.

It depends upon who you ask.


Whatever that means.

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:27:19 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:48:41 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:26:59 -0500, Boater wrote:

Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:19:46 -0500, Boater wrote:

BTW, you missed the second half of my post: Now, what about personal
insults and name-calling, don't you think it's time to quit?
--

Salmonbait
You think it was accidental? I ask because you are repeating yourself.
What conclusions might you draw from this?
I wouldn't mention my conclusions, because I think you'd find them
personally insulting. I'm hoping you'll be man enough to prove my
conclusions wrong.
--

Salmonbait

I'll be delighted to watch your progress in bringing the group around to
your way of thinking. If I notice any *positive* changes of significance
in the behaviors of those I haven't bozo-binned, I will gladly extend
them the same courtesy. This, of course, is precisely the "deal" I
offered previously.

No offense, but I have the feeling *you* think you have an ability to
cajole or negotiate me over to your position. I've told you many times I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less.

Now, perhaps you want to work on the others for a few weeks.

Harry, have you forgotten already the post you made not two hours ago?

*******************************
38 ¶ Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a
tooth for a tooth: Ex. 21.24 · Lev. 24.20 · Deut. 19.21
39 but I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall
smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
**************************************

You hold this up as a standard, yet make a statement like, "I
will treat others exactly as they treat me, no more, no less."

No offense, but don't you see just a little hypocrisy in that?
--

Salmonbait


Jesus is your saviour, not mine.

Which means what? Does your comment mean that you disagree with your quote?
If so, then why post it?


--

Salmonbait