Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CalifBill wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: The perfect example of why Social Security is going to fail and why we need to abandon it now. For some people it will be unfair and it will hurt but that is too bad. Everyone younger than 35 gets no Social Security but, they still fund it. Corporations with defined pension programs should not be allowed to "unfund" their pension liabilities. That's why the unions should be the clearing house for their members. Provide 100 workers at a rate of $50 per hour to meet a quota of 500 cars a day. What the union does with the money is between the union and the workers. First rule: Get the money up front. Well, that's similar to what the construction worker unions do. sort of. The construction unions negotiate a rate with the contractors...the contractors pay the workers their hourly paycheck rate and deduct and forward the required taxes to the feds. The deductions for health and welfare go directly to the jointly administered union-contractor health and welfare pension and benefit fund offices. Anyone who has access to any of the funds at the benefit is bonded. Typically, the trustees retain a reputable trust funder "advisor" who helps the trustees invest the funds in "safe" investments that pay a return higher than the anticipated payout for pensions and other benefits. There are no unfunded liabilities. The employer for whom the union workers work has no access to the pension funds. These are defined pensions, not 401k's. The employer may offer a 401k, but it isn't typically administered by the joint trustees. Yup union pension funds. Like the teamsters, plumbers, Ullico, etc. How many went to jail for those thefts. D'oh. If any pension funds were stolen, the bonding insurance companies made the funds good, and then insisted upon prosecution and aided the prosecutors. You don't seem to be able to understand the concept of union officer/pension fund officer-trustee bonding. Either that or you are suffering from short-term memory loss, because I have brought this to your attention at least a half-dozen times. I don't keep track of the teamsters or plumbers, since neither are my union. There was no "theft" of pension funds at ULLICO, either. Here...try reading this and see if you understand it: Bonding Requirements Section 502(a) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, as amended (LMRDA), and provisions of Section 7120 of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) establish bonding requirements for certain officers and employees of labor organizations. Every union covered by the LMRDA or the CSRA is subject to the bonding requirements except for unions whose property and annual receipts do not exceed $5,000 in value. The required bonds are a type of insurance agreement which guarantees reimbursement to the union for any financial losses caused by fraudulent or dishonest acts by officers or employees, such as theft, embezzlement, or forgery. The bonding requirements are not based on the idea that particular individuals or organizations are inherently dishonest. Rather, bonding is required because experience has shown that when people are entrusted with the money or property of another, there will be instances when individuals will cause a loss through fraud or dishonesty. Bonding is therefore required to insure the union against such a loss. The law provides that any person who "handles" union funds or property must be bonded for at least 10% of the funds handled during the union's preceding fiscal year up to a maximum of $500,000. An individual is considered to be "handling" union funds if his/her duties or authority provide access to union funds resulting in a significant risk of loss of funds if that person engages in fraudulent or dishonest acts. For example, a person who receives dues, fees, etc., from members is clearly "handling" union funds and therefore must be bonded. Also, however, any officer or employee who has authority to sign checks on the union's account is "handling" union funds and must be bonded even if he/she has no physical contact with the funds. Individuals who typically must be bonded include union officers (both elected and non-elected), employees such as business agents, trustees, key administrative and professional staff, and clerical personnel. On the reverse is a detailed worksheet designed to assist you in computing the amount of bonding coverage required. A quick formula for computing the approximate amount of bonding coverage required is: Liquid Assets + Total Receipts x 10%=Amount of coverage required per person Liquid assets, for purposes of this formula, are those assets that are quickly and easily negotiable. Cash on hand, deposits in any type of financial institution, certificates of deposit, U.S. Treasury securities, corporate stocks and bonds, and accounts and loans receivable are common examples of liquid assets. Property of a relatively permanent nature, such as land, buildings, furniture, and fixtures is not a liquid asset. The required bond must be obtained from a company on the U.S. Treasury Department list of approved bonding companies. The companies know whether they are approved and your national or international union may be able to assist you. You can also obtain a copy of the list from the nearest OLMS office. In addition to the requirement of placing the bond with a company on the Treasury Department list, the law prohibits placing the bond through an agent or broker or with a company in which any union or any officer, agent, shop steward, or other union representative has any direct or indirect interest. It is possible for a bond to cover more than one union. For example, many national or international unions obtain a bond covering both their organization and their affiliated unions. Contact your national or international union if you have any questions about whether your union is covered by such a bond. The following checklist will help you stay in compliance with the bonding requirements: * Refigure the amount of bonding coverage required for each fiscal year immediately after the close of the last fiscal year. (Figures required for the bonding computation must be compiled for your union's annual financial report Form LM-2, LM-3, or LM-4 as well.) * If your union's bonding requirements have increased from the last year's coverage, obtain amended coverage immediately. * Make sure every person who "handles" funds is covered. (The easiest way is to obtain standard "blanket" coverage for all persons who handle funds.) * Make sure the company issuing the bond is on the U.S. Treasury Department list of approved companies. If you have any questions about the bonding requirements or their application to your organization, contact the nearest OLMS office. Copies of an explanatory pamphlet, "Bonding Requirements Under the LMRDA and the CSRA," and the LMRDA bonding regulations, 29 CFR Part 453, are also available from the nearest OLMS office. Additional Tips for International Unions National and international unions that purchase bonding coverage for their affiliates should examine the timetables established for affiliates to report the funds handled during the fiscal year. The amount of bonding coverage must be set at the start of each fiscal year. This can be of particular importance if the amount of bonding coverage must be increased because of an increase in the amount of funds handled during the fiscal year. The LMRDA prohibits any person who is inadequately bonded from receiving, handling, disbursing, or otherwise exercising custody or control of any of the labor organization's funds or property. Unless the parent organization requires each affiliate to report the amount of funds handled immediately after the close of the fiscal year and then promptly arranges for adequate bonding coverage if an increase is required, adequate coverage may lapse for several months or longer, which is a violation of the LMRDA. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Where's my bailout | General | |||
UAW bailout | ASA | |||
Bailout? | ASA | |||
Bailout question | ASA | |||
Another 150 billion bailout! | ASA |