I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:31:26 -0500, Jim wrote:

HK wrote:
John wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:03:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 11, 11:18 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
BAR wrote:
Why did anyone ever pay for AOL?
The question is why did Time Warner buy AOL.
The Jews needed to hide some money from the IRS...................

You and Harry make a great pair.
Pick a religion and go for it.


You are more than a bit over the edge this morning, Herring.
Are you now accusing me of being anti-Semitic? I have nothing against
Christianity, by the way, but I have no respect for assholes like you
who claim to be Christians but whose behavior says otherwise.


And your behavior is condoned by what religion? WAFA

He seems to skip over that question.
--
John

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

John wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:31:26 -0500, Jim wrote:

HK wrote:
John wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:03:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 11, 11:18 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
BAR wrote:
Why did anyone ever pay for AOL?
The question is why did Time Warner buy AOL.
The Jews needed to hide some money from the IRS...................
You and Harry make a great pair.
Pick a religion and go for it.

You are more than a bit over the edge this morning, Herring.
Are you now accusing me of being anti-Semitic? I have nothing against
Christianity, by the way, but I have no respect for assholes like you
who claim to be Christians but whose behavior says otherwise.


And your behavior is condoned by what religion? WAFA

He seems to skip over that question.



Wow...someone quoted florida jim. I'll bet like you he claims to be a
Christian, too, even though he behaves otherwise.

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

HK wrote:
John wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:31:26 -0500, Jim wrote:

HK wrote:
John wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:03:47 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 11, 11:18 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
BAR wrote:
Why did anyone ever pay for AOL?
The question is why did Time Warner buy AOL.
The Jews needed to hide some money from the IRS...................
You and Harry make a great pair.
Pick a religion and go for it.

You are more than a bit over the edge this morning, Herring.
Are you now accusing me of being anti-Semitic? I have nothing
against Christianity, by the way, but I have no respect for assholes
like you who claim to be Christians but whose behavior says otherwise.


And your behavior is condoned by what religion? WAFA

He seems to skip over that question.



Wow...someone quoted florida jim. I'll bet like you he claims to be a
Christian, too, even though he behaves otherwise.

What religion condones your behavior?

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

On Dec 11, 10:58*pm, wrote:
On Dec 11, 10:54*pm, BAR wrote:





Why did anyone ever pay for AOL?

Mike wrote:
Do people still pay for AOL?

--Mike

"Tim" wrote in message
....
HA! AOL drops Usnet, photo hosting, and *now MAaffee....

Dear bschnautz,

Recently we wrote to inform you that your subscription to McAfee®
VirusScan® Plus - Special edition from AOL would no longer be a
complimentary benefit of your membership. While your existing software
will continue to operate normally until its license expires, we wanted
to make sure your online security protection is not interrupted.

We’ve negotiated a special price just for our members to upgrade to
McAfee® Internet Security Suite - Special edition from AOL. If you
upgrade now, you’ll pay only $34.99 -- a 13% discount off AOL’s
already low annual rate and a full 50% discount off the regular retail
price.

Internet Security Suite provides our highest level of protection, with
additional safeguards that aren’t included in your existing VirusScan
Plus softwa

Identity-theft protection that helps secure your personal information
Tools to improve your computer’s health and performance
Features to help shield your home network
Though it’s packed with more advanced features, the Internet Security
Suite looks and feels much like your current VirusScan Plus software,
making it easy to set up and use.

With more than 5,000 new online threats discovered every month, you
should not let your computer’s security protection lapse. Upgrade
before December 22, 2008 to take advantage of this special early
upgrade pricing.

Sincerely,

AOL Member Services

©2008 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved. AOL and the AOL Triangle Logo are
registered trademarks of AOL LLC. All other trademarks and/or
registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Crap, it was in the 90's when I was building computers for Archetects
and installing POS (point of sale) systems for business. I had a
specific clause in the contract for service that if AOL was installed
on the system, it voided the service contract completely... ;) *My
mother however kept it in her system till the day she died, I could
not cancel her contract :)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Way, WAY back I had an aol account. It took forever and a day to
cancel that crap. I'm telling you, they make it almost impossible.

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:12:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:41:33 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:59:57 -0500, wrote:

There was a time when it was only Prodigy and AOL
Let us not forget Compuserve which was there *long* before Prodigy or
AOL. Compuserve had the very best national and international dial-up
network, EMAIL and many valuable support forums and databases. They
could have easily converted their proprietaty screen formats to HTML
and web based presentation but they didn't see the need for it.
Heh - reminds me of a certain computer company executive who told me
that email would never become a mass market feature for the home
computer because the routing systems would be too complex, too
expensive to build and besides, telephones were easier.
Was this the profit himself, Edson?

Actually no - although it wouldn't have surprised me if he didn't feel
the same way.

It was Ken Olsen.

A member of the where are they now companies.

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

BAR wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:12:21 -0500, BAR wrote:

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:41:33 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:59:57 -0500, wrote:

There was a time when it was only Prodigy and AOL
Let us not forget Compuserve which was there *long* before Prodigy or
AOL. Compuserve had the very best national and international dial-up
network, EMAIL and many valuable support forums and databases. They
could have easily converted their proprietaty screen formats to HTML
and web based presentation but they didn't see the need for it.
Heh - reminds me of a certain computer company executive who told me
that email would never become a mass market feature for the home
computer because the routing systems would be too complex, too
expensive to build and besides, telephones were easier.
Was this the profit himself, Edson?

Actually no - although it wouldn't have surprised me if he didn't feel
the same way.

It was Ken Olsen.

A member of the where are they now companies.


Olsen is well-known. He may be a "was" but you are a never were and
never will be.

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:59:57 -0500, wrote:

There was a time when it was only Prodigy and AOL

Let us not forget Compuserve which was there *long* before Prodigy or
AOL. Compuserve had the very best national and international dial-up
network, EMAIL and many valuable support forums and databases. They
could have easily converted their proprietaty screen formats to HTML
and web based presentation but they didn't see the need for it.


It is a problem with most leaders in any industry, they become
complacent and don't adapt well to changes. Bill Gates has stated for
15 yrs of so, that his biggest fear concerning Microsoft was that they
would fail to adapt quickly in a rapidly changing marketing place.
Large companies become like a supertanker, very difficult and slow when
they want to change directions. The way they handled Vista is an
example of this problem. I want MS to have strong and viable
competition, but I would hate to see them go out of business. Millions
of of long term Windows supporters have decide Mac is superior to
Windows (including Harry. Vista's most vocal supporter). They are also
willing to pay a substantial upcharge for a Mac, it highlights the
real and perceived problems of Windows. If they don't' change their
"bull in a china shop" approach to marketing, they will become another
Prodigy, Compuserve and AOL.

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

I'm surprised they haven't tanked already.
 

On Dec 12, 11:11*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 11, 11:18 pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:
BAR wrote:
Why did anyone ever pay for AOL?
The question is why did Time Warner buy AOL.

The Jews needed to hide some money from the IRS...................

We are more creative than that. *Only an Italian Mobster would make that
mistake. *;)

LOL....