may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...reak/?mod=blog

Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue doens't
it?

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:58 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...ig-conference-
call-and-valerie-jarretts-clean-break/?mod=blog

Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue doens't it?

Lynch for not paying?

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:55:07 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:58 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...ig-conference-
call-and-valerie-jarretts-clean-break/?mod=blog

Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue doens't it?

Lynch for not paying?

Well, you know, outing a secret agent who really wasn't a secret agent
and being prosecuted for it seems like peanuts compared to this.

~~ besides - I'm bored as hell and trying to keep the newsgroup full
of obnoxious nonsense to compete with Harry. It's a competition. ~~

Heh, heh, heh... :)

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:55:07 -0600, wrote:

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:58 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...ig-conference-
call-and-valerie-jarretts-clean-break/?mod=blog
Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue doens't it?
Lynch for not paying?

Well, you know, outing a secret agent who really wasn't a secret agent
and being prosecuted for it seems like peanuts compared to this.

~~ besides - I'm bored as hell and trying to keep the newsgroup full
of obnoxious nonsense to compete with Harry. It's a competition. ~~

Heh, heh, heh... :)

You win for two categories the obnoxious and entertaining Tom.

But, Harry wins in banal, boring, insipid, pedestrian, immature, ...

On Dec 11, 7:26*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:55:07 -0600, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:58 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:

may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...ig-conference-
call-and-valerie-jarretts-clean-break/?mod=blog

Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue doens't it?

Lynch for not paying? *

Well, you know, outing a secret agent who really wasn't a secret agent
and being prosecuted for it seems like peanuts compared to this.

~~ besides - I'm bored as hell and trying to keep the newsgroup full
of obnoxious nonsense to compete with Harry. *It's a competition. ~~

Heh, heh, heh... *:)

You're not nearly narcissistic enough to keep up with Harry. Besides,
you're truthful.

wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:24:37 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 11, 7:26 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:55:07 -0600, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:58 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...ig-conference-
call-and-valerie-jarretts-clean-break/?mod=blog
Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue doens't it?
Lynch for not paying?
Well, you know, outing a secret agent who really wasn't a secret agent
and being prosecuted for it seems like peanuts compared to this.

~~ besides - I'm bored as hell and trying to keep the newsgroup full
of obnoxious nonsense to compete with Harry. It's a competition. ~~

Heh, heh, heh... :)
You're not nearly narcissistic enough to keep up with Harry. Besides,
you're truthful.

L-I-A-R

You could possibly an idiot savant, if your vocabulary contained more
than one word.

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:24:37 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 11, 7:26 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:55:07 -0600, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:58 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...ig-conference-
call-and-valerie-jarretts-clean-break/?mod=blog
Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue
doens't it?
Lynch for not paying?
Well, you know, outing a secret agent who really wasn't a secret agent
and being prosecuted for it seems like peanuts compared to this.

~~ besides - I'm bored as hell and trying to keep the newsgroup full
of obnoxious nonsense to compete with Harry. It's a competition. ~~

Heh, heh, heh... :)
You're not nearly narcissistic enough to keep up with Harry. Besides,
you're truthful.

L-I-A-R

You could possibly an idiot savant, if your vocabulary contained more
than one word.


There's no question about you. You have the idiot part down pat. But
there's no evidence of savant.

wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:17:36 -0500, Boater
wrote:

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:24:37 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 11, 7:26 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:55:07 -0600, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:58 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...ig-conference-
call-and-valerie-jarretts-clean-break/?mod=blog
Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue
doens't it?
Lynch for not paying?
Well, you know, outing a secret agent who really wasn't a secret agent
and being prosecuted for it seems like peanuts compared to this.

~~ besides - I'm bored as hell and trying to keep the newsgroup full
of obnoxious nonsense to compete with Harry. It's a competition. ~~

Heh, heh, heh... :)
You're not nearly narcissistic enough to keep up with Harry. Besides,
you're truthful.
L-I-A-R
You could possibly an idiot savant, if your vocabulary contained more
than one word.

There's no question about you. You have the idiot part down pat. But
there's no evidence of savant.

It was a typo. Bar is an "idiot sycophant"


You are advancing to big words. I am proud of your quick advancement.
Did Harry tell you the meaning of sycophant?

On Dec 11, 12:18*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:02:37 -0500, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:17:36 -0500, Boater
wrote:

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:24:37 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Dec 11, 7:26 am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:55:07 -0600, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:33:58 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
may seem to be in order for Obama's "aides"?
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/1...ig-conference-
call-and-valerie-jarretts-clean-break/?mod=blog
Seem only fair - selling a Senate has to be a serious issue
doens't it?
Lynch for not paying? *
Well, you know, outing a secret agent who really wasn't a secret agent
and being prosecuted for it seems like peanuts compared to this.

~~ besides - I'm bored as hell and trying to keep the newsgroup full
of obnoxious nonsense to compete with Harry. *It's a competition. ~~

Heh, heh, heh... *:)
You're not nearly narcissistic enough to keep up with Harry. Besides,
you're truthful.
L-I-A-R
You could possibly an idiot savant, if your vocabulary contained more
than one word.

There's no question about you. You have the idiot part down pat. But
there's no evidence of savant.

It was a typo. Bar is an "idiot sycophant"

You are advancing to big words. I am proud of your quick advancement.
Did Harry tell you the meaning of sycophant?

Lack of argument about the description of you is duly noted.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Some people realize you are too stupid to try to explain anything to.