On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:50:04 -0600, wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:31:08 -0500, John wrote:


Waterboarding is torture, schitthead. We aren't supposed to do that.

Bull****. Ever been to a swimming pool? Ever stood in a shower? The
physical pain is no worse. Actually, the physical pain is less than what
your endure when you pop one of those evil smelling pustules on your
face.

Uh huh, I guess that's why we prosecuted several Japanese for
waterboarding after WWII. Of course, then it was considered a war crime,
but then, we also strove for the high moral ground.

cite please?
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

John wrote:

Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two
of us, your compadres would have to agree.

Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you.
Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks?
No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone
for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though
you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me.

I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as
pie.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John


As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with
you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy.

Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree?

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:43 -0500, John wrote:


Uh huh, I guess that's why we prosecuted several Japanese for
waterboarding after WWII. Of course, then it was considered a war
crime, but then, we also strove for the high moral ground.

cite please?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...le/2007/11/02/
AR2007110201170.html

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote:

John wrote:

Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two
of us, your compadres would have to agree.

Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you.
Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks?
No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone
for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though
you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me.

I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as
pie.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John


As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with
you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy.

Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree?

I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks
attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and
Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same.

Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not
participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling?
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:21:06 -0600, wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:43 -0500, John wrote:


Uh huh, I guess that's why we prosecuted several Japanese for
waterboarding after WWII. Of course, then it was considered a war
crime, but then, we also strove for the high moral ground.

cite please?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...le/2007/11/02/
AR2007110201170.html

I have a very strong feeling that although 'waterboarding' may have been
part of the repertoire of the commanders of Japanese POW camps, it was not
the basis for their prosecution.

You're quoting a liberally biased rag, BTW. (Not that the WP would slant
the news in any way, shape or form.)

If we tried and punished folks for the *same* waterboarding activity in
which we've been recently engaged, then we were wrong in doing so.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote:

John wrote:

Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two
of us, your compadres would have to agree.
Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you.
Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks?
No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone
for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though
you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me.

I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as
pie.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with
you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy.

Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree?

I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks
attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and
Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same.

Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not
participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling?
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

Did I hear JEWISH? Chag Sameach

John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote:

John wrote:

Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two
of us, your compadres would have to agree.
Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you.
Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks?
No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone
for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though
you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me.

I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as
pie.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with
you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy.

Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree?

I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks
attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and
Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same.

Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not
participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling?
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John


Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will
never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited
to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point.

I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to
extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same.

John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote:

John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote:

John wrote:

Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two
of us, your compadres would have to agree.
Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you.
Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks?
No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone
for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though
you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me.

I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as
pie.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John
As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with
you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy.

Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree?
I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks
attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and
Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same.

Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not
participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling?
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will
never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited
to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point.

I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to
extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same.

Having all those folks filtered should make it easy.

No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you
stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference?

Look at your statement above:

"Most of the jackals are permanent members..."

If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same
message across, but without the personal insult.

It's not that difficult.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John


I call 'em as I see 'em. If they are in the bozo bin, they are there
because about all they do here is toss insults. Jackals.

Boater wrote:
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater
wrote:

John wrote:

Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond
the two of us, your compadres would have to agree.
Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you.
Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's
attacks?
No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell,
I've gone
for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though
you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me.
I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours.
Easy as
pie.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with
you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy.

Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree?

I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about
folks
attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and
Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same.

Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not
participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling?
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John


Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will
never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited
to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point.

I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to
extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same.
Here's my gift to Krause. No more poking at him till after Christmas. I
hope I can do it. We'll see.

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote:

John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote:

John wrote:

Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two
of us, your compadres would have to agree.
Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you.
Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks?
No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone
for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though
you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me.

I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as
pie.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John

As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with
you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy.

Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree?

I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks
attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and
Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same.

Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not
participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling?
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John


Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will
never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited
to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point.

I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to
extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same.

Having all those folks filtered should make it easy.

No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you
stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference?

Look at your statement above:

"Most of the jackals are permanent members..."

If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same
message across, but without the personal insult.

It's not that difficult.
--
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!"

John