|
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:38:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Dec 18, 8:09*pm, wrote: On Dec 16, 9:00*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Dec 16, 7:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... Another radio editorial: MANAGER'S MEMO 12/16/08 Blagogate enters its second week with plenty to ponder. Like last week…let me hit some key points to consider as this stain widens. -The silence of former Illinois Congressman and the proposed chief of staff to the president-elect, Rahm Emanuel, certainly is deafening. Emanuel once bragged that he and Obama had masterminded Rob Blagojevich's 2002 gubernatorial campaign. Now he is dodging reporters and offering zero comment. It is logical that Emanuel had conversations with Hot Rod…..nothing wrong there. The silence is probably because Emanuel is all over the wire taps. Anything he says now --can't dispute what appears on the tapes….which are sure to be released eventually. -On another front I continue to see the national media go completely into the tank for the incoming president. Remember when the GOP named Sarah Palin as VP? Remember the dozens of reporters and investigators that rushed to tiny Wasilla, Alaska to find dirt? Good grief, they were relentless. But look where Obama cut his teeth? Chicago, Illinois--- Where graft is a birthright. And yet, there was woefully little reporting on Obama's rise through the southside of the windy city. -Who is the sitting Governor meeting these days? One day he is meeting with a group of ministers and the next he is meeting with rapper R. Kelly's attorney. What an interesting lesson in diversity….One day breaking bread with the monsignor and asking for forgiveness…and the next asking a criminal lawyer how to cut the best deal to save his own skin…..What an interesting life. And finally, I received an e-mail from an Illinois native last week….and this is what it said on the bottom of the message-----“quote” ----- “Being a native Illinoisan means being a “can-do” person. Heck, even our Governors roll up their sleeves and make license plates.” Maybe Blago is trying to make it a state crime instead of a Federal crime and then he can pardon himself. Well, locals have already discussed what he can do with himself..... LOL!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, it looks like Blago is going to get away with it as a "joke"... The Dems (surprise, surprise) are going to fight to keep him in office. Like I said, if it was a repub, he would already be out... Well, One thing I've wondered. Objectively speaking, was a crime really committed? I've thought about this and he *tried* to sell the senate seat, but was nabbed before any cash 'n prizes changed hands. Don't take me wrong, I think he's an unethical scumbag and always have. Really. And offering is a sin, but is it a crime? Actually i think he should be outed because we're tired of his crap. But that probably won't happen. If you're solicited by a whore, isn't he guilty of solicitation whether or not the act took place? Assuming, of course, that whoring is illegal in your state. (We know it's not illegal in Maryland.) -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Dec 19, 7:32*am, Boater wrote:
John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? Harry, that statement is unbelievable. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Boater wrote:
This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? Do you have any idea how ignorant a statement like that makes you sound, Krause. Liberal arts scholar, indeed. What was your major, Basket Weaving? |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:32:47 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? You actually believed all that John Kerry ****, didn't you? Actually, Harry, I *did* go on a lot of MEDCAPS and DENTCAPS. Some of the folks we saw may have *thought* they were being killed! You're stooping, but, like a pile of dog poop on the sidewalk, you can't get much lower. You'll attract a lot of attention though! -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:32:47 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? You actually believed all that John Kerry ****, didn't you? Sorry, never heard any of it from Kerry. Hardly heard of him at all until he ran for POTUS. You forget, I was there, I have a lot of contemporaries who were there, too, and there was plenty of news coverage of our excesses aimed at propping up Vietnam's right-wing government. You'd be just the sort of asshole who would get a woody from waterboarding someone. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:32:47 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? You actually believed all that John Kerry ****, didn't you? Sorry, never heard any of it from Kerry. Hardly heard of him at all until he ran for POTUS. You forget, I was there, I have a lot of contemporaries who were there, too, and there was plenty of news coverage of our excesses aimed at propping up Vietnam's right-wing government. You'd be just the sort of asshole who would get a woody from waterboarding someone. Reaally Harry? You were in Vietnam? Press corps? USO tour? Civilian spy? |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Tim wrote:
On Dec 19, 7:32 am, Boater wrote: John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? Harry, that statement is unbelievable. Here's a hint, Tim. Herring spends most of his day here trying to insult me, directly or (his specialty) indirectly. I'm merely returning the favor. I haven't noticed *you* going after Herring or any of his pack of juvenile jackals for insulting me. I have no idea what Herring did in Vietnam. He could have been handing out soap, for all I care. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:56:32 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:32:47 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? You actually believed all that John Kerry ****, didn't you? Sorry, never heard any of it from Kerry. Hardly heard of him at all until he ran for POTUS. You forget, I was there, I have a lot of contemporaries who were there, too, and there was plenty of news coverage of our excesses aimed at propping up Vietnam's right-wing government. You'd be just the sort of asshole who would get a woody from waterboarding someone. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Saying Merry Christmas does not make *you* a Christian. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:56:32 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:32:47 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? You actually believed all that John Kerry ****, didn't you? Sorry, never heard any of it from Kerry. Hardly heard of him at all until he ran for POTUS. You forget, I was there, I have a lot of contemporaries who were there, too, and there was plenty of news coverage of our excesses aimed at propping up Vietnam's right-wing government. You'd be just the sort of asshole who would get a woody from waterboarding someone. Harry, we all know how you and the truth don't seem to get along very well. It's hard to forget an occurrence that didn't occur. (You were there?....Hah!) You are little more than a joke, Harry. About like a pile of dog poop on the sidewalk. Enough to attract attention. Waterboarding is an acceptable way of gathering intelligence. Of course, if you're a liberal, then 'intelligence' is meaningless anyway. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
Waterboarding is an acceptable way of gathering intelligence. Of course, if you're a liberal, then 'intelligence' is meaningless anyway. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Waterboarding is torture, schitthead. We aren't supposed to do that. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Boater wrote:
John wrote: We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Saying Merry Christmas does not make *you* a Christian. READ FOR CONTENT, MORON |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:10:17 -0500, Boater wrote:
Tim wrote: On Dec 19, 7:32 am, Boater wrote: John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? Harry, that statement is unbelievable. Here's a hint, Tim. Herring spends most of his day here trying to insult me, directly or (his specialty) indirectly. I'm merely returning the favor. I haven't noticed *you* going after Herring or any of his pack of juvenile jackals for insulting me. I have no idea what Herring did in Vietnam. He could have been handing out soap, for all I care. Harry, stop being a crybaby. I suggested a while back that we both stop with the personal insults, across the board. You rejected that suggestion, and now are crying because of someone 'trying to insult' you. Whine, whine. How about an agreement to stop them. Period. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:10:17 -0500, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Dec 19, 7:32 am, Boater wrote: John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? Harry, that statement is unbelievable. Here's a hint, Tim. Herring spends most of his day here trying to insult me, directly or (his specialty) indirectly. I'm merely returning the favor. I haven't noticed *you* going after Herring or any of his pack of juvenile jackals for insulting me. I have no idea what Herring did in Vietnam. He could have been handing out soap, for all I care. Harry, stop being a crybaby. I suggested a while back that we both stop with the personal insults, across the board. You rejected that suggestion, and now are crying because of someone 'trying to insult' you. Whine, whine. How about an agreement to stop them. Period. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I'm not whining. I am merely pointing out your "Christian" behavior. Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:44:31 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: Waterboarding is an acceptable way of gathering intelligence. Of course, if you're a liberal, then 'intelligence' is meaningless anyway. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Waterboarding is torture, schitthead. We aren't supposed to do that. Bull****. Ever been to a swimming pool? Ever stood in a shower? The physical pain is no worse. Actually, the physical pain is less than what your endure when you pop one of those evil smelling pustules on your face. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:44:31 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Waterboarding is an acceptable way of gathering intelligence. Of course, if you're a liberal, then 'intelligence' is meaningless anyway. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Waterboarding is torture, schitthead. We aren't supposed to do that. Bull****. Ever been to a swimming pool? Ever stood in a shower? The physical pain is no worse. Actually, the physical pain is less than what your endure when you pop one of those evil smelling pustules on your face. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Typically, when I'm swimming or in the shower, I'm not blindfolded and made to believe I am about to drown, nor is there anyone holding my head under water or forcing water down my throat. But if you think waterboarding produces the same thoughts and feelings as taking a shower or swimming in a pool...well... |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:31:08 -0500, John wrote:
Waterboarding is torture, schitthead. We aren't supposed to do that. Bull****. Ever been to a swimming pool? Ever stood in a shower? The physical pain is no worse. Actually, the physical pain is less than what your endure when you pop one of those evil smelling pustules on your face. Uh huh, I guess that's why we prosecuted several Japanese for waterboarding after WWII. Of course, then it was considered a war crime, but then, we also strove for the high moral ground. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:23:09 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:10:17 -0500, Boater wrote: Tim wrote: On Dec 19, 7:32 am, Boater wrote: John wrote: If you're solicited by a whore... John This from a John who was solicited and accepted by the U.S. Army to go to Vietnam and kill women and children? Harry, that statement is unbelievable. Here's a hint, Tim. Herring spends most of his day here trying to insult me, directly or (his specialty) indirectly. I'm merely returning the favor. I haven't noticed *you* going after Herring or any of his pack of juvenile jackals for insulting me. I have no idea what Herring did in Vietnam. He could have been handing out soap, for all I care. Harry, stop being a crybaby. I suggested a while back that we both stop with the personal insults, across the board. You rejected that suggestion, and now are crying because of someone 'trying to insult' you. Whine, whine. How about an agreement to stop them. Period. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I'm not whining. I am merely pointing out your "Christian" behavior. Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:35:30 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:44:31 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Waterboarding is an acceptable way of gathering intelligence. Of course, if you're a liberal, then 'intelligence' is meaningless anyway. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Waterboarding is torture, schitthead. We aren't supposed to do that. Bull****. Ever been to a swimming pool? Ever stood in a shower? The physical pain is no worse. Actually, the physical pain is less than what your endure when you pop one of those evil smelling pustules on your face. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Typically, when I'm swimming or in the shower, I'm not blindfolded and made to believe I am about to drown, nor is there anyone holding my head under water or forcing water down my throat. But if you think waterboarding produces the same thoughts and feelings as taking a shower or swimming in a pool...well... Well, close your eyes and open your mouth. No one is 'forcing' water down the throat of whoever is being waterboarded. Ah, *feelings*! The liberals are worried that we may hurt their 'thoughts and feelings'. What bull****.Now, the 'thoughts and feelings' may be affected. But so what? When the twin towers came down, my thoughts and feelings were affected. I lived. They will too, and no worse for wear. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
|
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:43 -0500, John wrote:
Uh huh, I guess that's why we prosecuted several Japanese for waterboarding after WWII. Of course, then it was considered a war crime, but then, we also strove for the high moral ground. cite please? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...le/2007/11/02/ AR2007110201170.html |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Did I hear JEWISH? Chag Sameach |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Having all those folks filtered should make it easy. No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference? Look at your statement above: "Most of the jackals are permanent members..." If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same message across, but without the personal insult. It's not that difficult. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I call 'em as I see 'em. If they are in the bozo bin, they are there because about all they do here is toss insults. Jackals. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Here's my gift to Krause. No more poking at him till after Christmas. I hope I can do it. We'll see. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Having all those folks filtered should make it easy. No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference? Look at your statement above: "Most of the jackals are permanent members..." If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same message across, but without the personal insult. It's not that difficult. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Jim wrote:
Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Here's my gift to Krause. No more poking at him till after Christmas. I hope I can do it. We'll see. He will never know, he has you in his bozo bin. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Jim wrote: Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Here's my gift to Krause. No more poking at him till after Christmas. I hope I can do it. We'll see. He will never know, he has you in his bozo bin. There's no way of knowing that, is there? |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Jim wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Jim wrote: Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Here's my gift to Krause. No more poking at him till after Christmas. I hope I can do it. We'll see. He will never know, he has you in his bozo bin. There's no way of knowing that, is there? I think you are a permanent member of the bozo club, unless he is using one of his other computers, has updated his software, temporary disconnected his elaborate filters, or is reviewing his bozo bin filter log files for any obvious trends. Then you may not be in the bozo bin, but there is not way of knowing. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:09:38 -0500, Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Having all those folks filtered should make it easy. No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference? Look at your statement above: "Most of the jackals are permanent members..." If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same message across, but without the personal insult. It's not that difficult. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I call 'em as I see 'em. If they are in the bozo bin, they are there because about all they do here is toss insults. Jackals. You totally disregarded the point of my response. Do you ever consider that the insults may be fewer if you controlled your behavior? I'm not saying they'd stop, but those that are hurled simply in retaliation would diminish greatly. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
Jim wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: Jim wrote: Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Here's my gift to Krause. No more poking at him till after Christmas. I hope I can do it. We'll see. He will never know, he has you in his bozo bin. There's no way of knowing that, is there? I think you are a permanent member of the bozo club, unless he is using one of his other computers, has updated his software, temporary disconnected his elaborate filters, or is reviewing his bozo bin filter log files for any obvious trends. Then you may not be in the bozo bin, but there is not way of knowing. Just in case, would you please extend to him my sincerest wishes for a Merry Christmas? Thank you so much. Happy holidays to you Reggie. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:09:38 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Having all those folks filtered should make it easy. No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference? Look at your statement above: "Most of the jackals are permanent members..." If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same message across, but without the personal insult. It's not that difficult. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I call 'em as I see 'em. If they are in the bozo bin, they are there because about all they do here is toss insults. Jackals. You totally disregarded the point of my response. Do you ever consider that the insults may be fewer if you controlled your behavior? I'm not saying they'd stop, but those that are hurled simply in retaliation would diminish greatly. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I've considered that, and I've concluded the majority of "jackals" are that way because of my politics. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
John wrote:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:09:38 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Having all those folks filtered should make it easy. No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference? Look at your statement above: "Most of the jackals are permanent members..." If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same message across, but without the personal insult. It's not that difficult. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I call 'em as I see 'em. If they are in the bozo bin, they are there because about all they do here is toss insults. Jackals. You totally disregarded the point of my response. Do you ever consider that the insults may be fewer if you controlled your behavior? I'm not saying they'd stop, but those that are hurled simply in retaliation would diminish greatly. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John We say "Chanukah Sameach" to each other, and Merry Christmas to goys who celebrate Christmas. I guess to some we should just say, I hope you got some nice presents for Dec. 25th. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Boater wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:09:38 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Having all those folks filtered should make it easy. No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference? Look at your statement above: "Most of the jackals are permanent members..." If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same message across, but without the personal insult. It's not that difficult. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I call 'em as I see 'em. If they are in the bozo bin, they are there because about all they do here is toss insults. Jackals. You totally disregarded the point of my response. Do you ever consider that the insults may be fewer if you controlled your behavior? I'm not saying they'd stop, but those that are hurled simply in retaliation would diminish greatly. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I've considered that, and I've concluded the majority of "jackals" are that way because of my politics. Harry, Jim would like to wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy Holiday season. Chanukah Sameach |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:09:38 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Having all those folks filtered should make it easy. No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference? Look at your statement above: "Most of the jackals are permanent members..." If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same message across, but without the personal insult. It's not that difficult. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I call 'em as I see 'em. If they are in the bozo bin, they are there because about all they do here is toss insults. Jackals. You totally disregarded the point of my response. Do you ever consider that the insults may be fewer if you controlled your behavior? I'm not saying they'd stop, but those that are hurled simply in retaliation would diminish greatly. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John We say "Chanukah Sameach" to each other, and Merry Christmas to goys who celebrate Christmas. I guess to some we should just say, I hope you got some nice presents for Dec. 25th. It's really not a big deal, is it? Leave it to the liberals to make an issue out of it. |
Blagojevich just wanted a job with a labor union...
Jim wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:09:38 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:43 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:17:56 -0500, Boater wrote: John wrote: Your agreement is acceptable on a one-to-one basis. To go beyond the two of us, your compadres would have to agree. Bull****. Learn to disregard the personal insults directed towards you. Have you seen me respond to any of the Salty or that other guy's attacks? No, not lately. You decide to ignore them. It can be done. Hell, I've gone for a couple weeks without responding to any of your ****, even though you've directed a couple dozen posts a day towards me. I'll ignore the attacks by Donnie and those other friends of yours. Easy as pie. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John As I stated, I will enter into and honor a one-to-one agreement with you. If others decide to join in, I will extend them the same courtesy. Quid pro quo. It's the *Christian* thing to do, don't you agree? I think you're lacking in the will power department. You whine about folks attacking you, but you won't stop. I'll be glad to do the Christian, and Jewish, thing. I'll stop *all* personal insults if you'll do the same. Do you find it too hard to ignore the attacks of others? Can you not participate in *any* discussion without resorting to name-calling? -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John Actually, most of jackals are permanent members of my bozo bin, and will never be allowed out. The permanent members include but are not limited to Loogy, DK, FloridaJim, et cetera. But that's not the point. I'm not lacking in will power on this issue, I'm simply unwilling to extend "good will" to those unwilling to do the same. Having all those folks filtered should make it easy. No one is suggesting you 'extend good will' to anyone. I'm suggesting you stop extending *bad* will to *anyone*. Do you see the difference? Look at your statement above: "Most of the jackals are permanent members..." If you had omitted the word 'jackals', you would have gotten the same message across, but without the personal insult. It's not that difficult. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John I call 'em as I see 'em. If they are in the bozo bin, they are there because about all they do here is toss insults. Jackals. You totally disregarded the point of my response. Do you ever consider that the insults may be fewer if you controlled your behavior? I'm not saying they'd stop, but those that are hurled simply in retaliation would diminish greatly. -- We say, "MERRY CHRISTMAS!" John We say "Chanukah Sameach" to each other, and Merry Christmas to goys who celebrate Christmas. I guess to some we should just say, I hope you got some nice presents for Dec. 25th. It's really not a big deal, is it? Leave it to the liberals to make an issue out of it. In NYC with a higher percent of Non Christians than most cities, it is never a problem. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com