wrote:
On Dec 7, 1:21 am, "CRM" wrote:
wrote in message

...

I dunno, it looks like it has a pretty short barrel so unless someone
is a pretty good shot, my understanding is that a weapon like this is
not good for anything beyond a few feet.
-----------------------------------------------

Here's a grouping free hand at 25 yards (75 feet for you backwoodsers)http://www.dezendorf.us/photos/M2801.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Hard to handle too I would imagine, must have a hell of a muzzle lift
--------------------------------------------------------------------

For a little guy, maybe.

------------------------------------------------------------------
but again, I don't know from firearms...
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Then why not STFU?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
And unlike my new troll CRM, I was not trying to pick
a fight, but you already knew that...
----------------------------------------------------------------

Why should he "know" that?

---------------------------------------------------------------
I am just a tool ........
---------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------
I just thought other weapons would be better.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Why? You already said you know nothing about firearms.

Wow, you are a nice little troll... you are dismissed, now crawl back
under your desk and get back to your google brains..


Since you admit you know nothing about guns, why are you so obstreperous
when someone points out that you said.

You know nothing about guns.

Therefore your opinions about what might be good, bad or indifferent
handguns...amount to a pile of cold dogturds.