| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... ""UglyDan®©T"" wrote in message ... "Boater" wrote: I appreciate the theory of not getting hit, and I am sure those who have high-powered, supersonic, anti-ship missiles do, too. I think an aluminum superstructure is a mistake on a capital warship. The USS Belknap was built in the 60's and she had an aluminum superstructure, Wasn't too much left of her, except the hull after the collision with the Kennedy. UD Quite a few modern naval ships have steel hulls and aluminum superstructures. They just aren't supposed to crash into an aircraft carrier. Eisboch Seems to me the Brits had a problem with Aluminum superstructures on their warships in the Falklands War.. The French built Exocet missle caused major fires. Of course they did. Any ship hit with bombs or missiles is in deep do-do. The idea is to not get hit. That has been the focus of modern US weapons platform design for many years now and it is paying off. The number of lost ships, tanks, airplanes, helicopters, etc. in combat is incredibly low relative to the damage they can inflict. Much of it is related to defensive electronic warfare systems. We don't have to rely on pure numbers anymore. Still, this may come as a shock to some, but Navy ships aren't designed to be completely safe and bullet proof, regardless of the materials used. And steel ships have also had serious major fires as well. It's a risk versus cost versus performance thing. Big, expensive ships like Carriers operate in a task force that includes many smaller, less expensive and, for lack of a better word, expendable ships tasked with protecting the big boys. Frigates, for example (used to be called Destroyer Escorts) were cheap to build, mass produced, only designed for about a 20 year service life and outnumbered the bigger cruisers and carriers in the fleet by 20 or 30 to one. When under attack, the DE's charged the enemy in numbers and distracted them from the big boys, even if it meant taking a torpedo meant for the carrier. The DE's and more modern Frigates had/have a crew of between 200 and 300. These new ships only carry a crew of 40 and at flank speed are much harder to hit (they are much lighter - performance versus risk) and have advanced electronic warfare systems, both defensive and offensive. I'd feel much safer on one of them. Note: I am not referring to the actual process of designing and building of the ships. That's another issue altogether. Eisboch |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Well that was interesting... | General | |||
| Well that was interesting... | General | |||
| Well, that was interesting... | General | |||
| A visit with an interesting guy who builds an interesting boat.... | General | |||
| You are Visitor number 0085178 or Mnemonics for Sailors | Cruising | |||