| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Boater" wrote in message ... I am underwhelmed by that warship. It's going to break down a lot, it's going to be expensive to fix, and it's too dependent upon technology. Probably also said, word for word, by your great, great grandfather about this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Fulton It's part of the evolution to new platforms for our future defensive and offensive naval capabilities. Just recently we had a discussion here in which you (or somebody) was critical of the expense and potential vulnerability of an obsolete blue water Navy designed and configured to fight cold war era battles. This ship is fast, draws only about 8 feet and is far less expensive to operate and maintain than the class ship it will eventually replace. It isn't going to happen overnight, but ships with this and similar capabilities will slowly replace the battlewagons of yesterday. One benefit of the new technologies developed is that some of it , particularly defensive and electronic warfare systems many can be retrofitted to existing platforms in commission now. Eisboch |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Well that was interesting... | General | |||
| Well that was interesting... | General | |||
| Well, that was interesting... | General | |||
| A visit with an interesting guy who builds an interesting boat.... | General | |||
| You are Visitor number 0085178 or Mnemonics for Sailors | Cruising | |||