About $8000 for the body only. (Yikes)

24,5 Megapixel in FX-Format
3D Color Matrix II, Center-Weighted and Spot Metering
1 - 7 fps
1/8000 to 30 seconds shutter
ISO equivalency 100 to 1,600
2 lb 11 oz / 1220 g
Price est. $7,995 USD body

Another FX-format camera means that Nikon will jump back with both feet
into the production of full-frame lenses, updating some of the current
ones and introducing new ones.

SW Tom should buy of the new D3X boxes...

On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:20:19 -0500, Boater wrote:

About $8000 for the body only. (Yikes)

24,5 Megapixel in FX-Format
3D Color Matrix II, Center-Weighted and Spot Metering
1 - 7 fps
1/8000 to 30 seconds shutter
ISO equivalency 100 to 1,600
2 lb 11 oz / 1220 g
Price est. $7,995 USD body

Another FX-format camera means that Nikon will jump back with both feet
into the production of full-frame lenses, updating some of the current
ones and introducing new ones.

SW Tom should buy of the new D3X boxes...


Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less than
$1000.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

On Dec 1, 2:27*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:20:19 -0500, Boater wrote:
About $8000 for the body only. (Yikes)

24,5 Megapixel in FX-Format
3D Color Matrix II, Center-Weighted and Spot Metering
1 - 7 fps
1/8000 to 30 seconds shutter
ISO equivalency 100 to 1,600
2 lb 11 oz / 1220 g
Price est. $7,995 USD body

Another FX-format camera means that Nikon will jump back with both feet
into the production of full-frame lenses, updating some of the current
ones and introducing new ones.

SW Tom should buy of the new D3X boxes...

Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less than
$1000.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry doesn't do any photo manipulation, he'd rather see just what the
eye sees, no matter if it's washed out, or what. All he needs to do
that is a $100 point and shoot.

wrote:
On Dec 1, 2:27 pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:20:19 -0500, Boater wrote:
About $8000 for the body only. (Yikes)
24,5 Megapixel in FX-Format
3D Color Matrix II, Center-Weighted and Spot Metering
1 - 7 fps
1/8000 to 30 seconds shutter
ISO equivalency 100 to 1,600
2 lb 11 oz / 1220 g
Price est. $7,995 USD body
Another FX-format camera means that Nikon will jump back with both feet
into the production of full-frame lenses, updating some of the current
ones and introducing new ones.
SW Tom should buy of the new D3X boxes...
Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less than
$1000.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry doesn't do any photo manipulation, he'd rather see just what the
eye sees, no matter if it's washed out, or what. All he needs to do
that is a $100 point and shoot.

He also gets his material from images.google.com

On Dec 1, 1:27*pm, JohnH wrote:


Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less than
$1000.
--

Yeah, like me. $4.95 Kodak disposables!

?;^ )

On Dec 1, 3:43*pm, Tim wrote:
On Dec 1, 1:27*pm, JohnH wrote:



Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less than
$1000.
--

Yeah, like me. $4.95 Kodak disposables!

?;^ )

I'm impressed! You are actually using a fairly modern technology!

On Dec 1, 2:45*pm, wrote:
On Dec 1, 3:43*pm, Tim wrote:

On Dec 1, 1:27*pm, JohnH wrote:
Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less than
$1000.
--

Yeah, like me. $4.95 Kodak disposables!

?;^ )

I'm impressed! You are actually using a fairly modern technology!

Well Loog, that's about as "point 'n shoot" as you can get!

?;^ Q

On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:43:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Dec 1, 1:27*pm, JohnH wrote:


Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less than
$1000.
--

Yeah, like me. $4.95 Kodak disposables!

?;^ )

What's happenin' with the Fuji? Haven't heard from you in a while.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

On Dec 1, 2:59*pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:43:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Dec 1, 1:27*pm, JohnH wrote:

Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less than
$1000.
--

Yeah, like me. $4.95 Kodak disposables!

?;^ )

What's happenin' with the Fuji? Haven't heard from you in a while.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

Oh, weekend got tied up, John. Nothing unpleasant though.

Daughter was headed back to college sunday afternoon and I had loose-
end errands to do with her.

I'll try to resume tonight or so.

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Dec 1, 2:59 pm, JohnH wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:43:42 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Dec 1, 1:27 pm, JohnH wrote:

Luckily, most of us can get by with camera bodies costing much less
than
$1000.
--

Yeah, like me. $4.95 Kodak disposables!

?;^ )

What's happenin' with the Fuji? Haven't heard from you in a while.
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*

Oh, weekend got tied up, John. Nothing unpleasant though.

Daughter was headed back to college sunday afternoon and I had loose-
end errands to do with her.

I'll try to resume tonight or so.
************************************************** *************************************************

All this talk of older film cameras is making me interested in buying some
120 film and running it through my Yashica D soon
http://mattdentonphoto.com/cameras/yashica_d.html