Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:52:11 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:35:43 -0500, Boater wrote: In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. Which is true as far as it goes. In this universe anyway. There have been recent experiments that prove we may live in more than one universe and up to as many as six at the same time. Einstein never accounted for those rules. :) I think Quantum Mechanics says there are an infinite number of universes. The fact that Einstein General Theory of Relativity does not agree with QM's is the reason physicists are looking for a Unified theory that would work on the grand scale and the atomic scale. I know the answer, but i am not telling. Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world - what Einstein did was extend Newtonian physics into three dimensions the third being time. In the Newtonian world, the laws were considered the same at any reference point in terms of time - it takes X time for Object A to travel to Object B or to put it another way, time is the same for all observers of an event no matter at which end of the observational platform one is observing from. Einstein proved that in fact, observers will and can experience time dilation depending on where the event is being observed from (think Doppler Shift) and a couple of other interesting effects such as length contraction and simultaneous relatively. Einstein didn't account for the possibility that instead of living in a three dimensional universe, we may actually live in a muti-dimensional universe. There have been several published experiments in which particles have been in two places at the same time and one of the more interesting ones, which has been duplicated, the particle appeared at it's destination before it left it's origin point. This would seem to indicate that there are more universes operating under more than Newtonian/Einsteinian laws than thought. Next time you want to ponder the universe, ponder this. Wormholes are theoritically possible -given enough power that is. It's pretty much strictly an engineering problem, not a problem with the theory. So, let's say you want to establish a worm hole from your living room to a high plateau on Omicron Persei 8 - a distance of one million light years. Now think about this - once the worm hole is established and you look through it, are you looking at the future or at the past? I'll wait. :) BTW, speaking Newton, how did the golf ball/base ball bat experiment go? 8) |
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:01:18 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:52:11 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:35:43 -0500, Boater wrote: In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. Which is true as far as it goes. In this universe anyway. There have been recent experiments that prove we may live in more than one universe and up to as many as six at the same time. Einstein never accounted for those rules. :) I think Quantum Mechanics says there are an infinite number of universes. The fact that Einstein General Theory of Relativity does not agree with QM's is the reason physicists are looking for a Unified theory that would work on the grand scale and the atomic scale. I know the answer, but i am not telling. Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world - what Einstein did was extend Newtonian physics into three dimensions the third being time. In the Newtonian world, the laws were considered the same at any reference point in terms of time - it takes X time for Object A to travel to Object B or to put it another way, time is the same for all observers of an event no matter at which end of the observational platform one is observing from. Einstein proved that in fact, observers will and can experience time dilation depending on where the event is being observed from (think Doppler Shift) and a couple of other interesting effects such as length contraction and simultaneous relatively. Einstein didn't account for the possibility that instead of living in a three dimensional universe, we may actually live in a muti-dimensional universe. There have been several published experiments in which particles have been in two places at the same time and one of the more interesting ones, which has been duplicated, the particle appeared at it's destination before it left it's origin point. This would seem to indicate that there are more universes operating under more than Newtonian/Einsteinian laws than thought. Next time you want to ponder the universe, ponder this. Wormholes are theoritically possible -given enough power that is. It's pretty much strictly an engineering problem, not a problem with the theory. So, let's say you want to establish a worm hole from your living room to a high plateau on Omicron Persei 8 - a distance of one million light years. Now think about this - once the worm hole is established and you look through it, are you looking at the future or at the past? I'll wait. :) BTW, speaking Newton, how did the golf ball/base ball bat experiment go? 8) Well, as long as you asked, it went quite well. I proved conclusively that I can hit a golf ball further wtih a baseball bat than I can with a golf club. |
#13
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:59:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:52:11 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:35:43 -0500, Boater wrote: In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. Which is true as far as it goes. In this universe anyway. There have been recent experiments that prove we may live in more than one universe and up to as many as six at the same time. Einstein never accounted for those rules. :) I think Quantum Mechanics says there are an infinite number of universes. The fact that Einstein General Theory of Relativity does not agree with QM's is the reason physicists are looking for a Unified theory that would work on the grand scale and the atomic scale. I know the answer, but i am not telling. Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world - what Einstein did was extend Newtonian physics into three dimensions the third being time. In the Newtonian world, the laws were considered the same at any reference point in terms of time - it takes X time for Object A to travel to Object B or to put it another way, time is the same for all observers of an event no matter at which end of the observational platform one is observing from. Einstein proved that in fact, observers will and can experience time dilation depending on where the event is being observed from (think Doppler Shift) and a couple of other interesting effects such as length contraction and simultaneous relatively. Einstein didn't account for the possibility that instead of living in a three dimensional universe, we may actually live in a muti-dimensional universe. There have been several published experiments in which particles have been in two places at the same time and one of the more interesting ones, which has been duplicated, the particle appeared at it's destination before it left it's origin point. This would seem to indicate that there are more universes operating under more than Newtonian/Einsteinian laws than thought. Next time you want to ponder the universe, ponder this. Wormholes are theoritically possible -given enough power that is. It's pretty much strictly an engineering problem, not a problem with the theory. So, let's say you want to establish a worm hole from your living room to a high plateau on Omicron Persei 8 - a distance of one million light years. Now think about this - once the worm hole is established and you look through it, are you looking at the future or at the past? I'll wait. :) I think you are trying to fool me. If you have bent the time/space continuum to form the wormhole, you would be looking at the present. You'd think so wouldn't you? Guess again. :) Ok, I keep trying to think this through, and I keep coming up with is I am married to my Grandmother. |
#14
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:03:34 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:59:35 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:52:11 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:35:43 -0500, Boater wrote: In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. Which is true as far as it goes. In this universe anyway. There have been recent experiments that prove we may live in more than one universe and up to as many as six at the same time. Einstein never accounted for those rules. :) I think Quantum Mechanics says there are an infinite number of universes. The fact that Einstein General Theory of Relativity does not agree with QM's is the reason physicists are looking for a Unified theory that would work on the grand scale and the atomic scale. I know the answer, but i am not telling. Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world - what Einstein did was extend Newtonian physics into three dimensions the third being time. In the Newtonian world, the laws were considered the same at any reference point in terms of time - it takes X time for Object A to travel to Object B or to put it another way, time is the same for all observers of an event no matter at which end of the observational platform one is observing from. Einstein proved that in fact, observers will and can experience time dilation depending on where the event is being observed from (think Doppler Shift) and a couple of other interesting effects such as length contraction and simultaneous relatively. Einstein didn't account for the possibility that instead of living in a three dimensional universe, we may actually live in a muti-dimensional universe. There have been several published experiments in which particles have been in two places at the same time and one of the more interesting ones, which has been duplicated, the particle appeared at it's destination before it left it's origin point. This would seem to indicate that there are more universes operating under more than Newtonian/Einsteinian laws than thought. Next time you want to ponder the universe, ponder this. Wormholes are theoritically possible -given enough power that is. It's pretty much strictly an engineering problem, not a problem with the theory. So, let's say you want to establish a worm hole from your living room to a high plateau on Omicron Persei 8 - a distance of one million light years. Now think about this - once the worm hole is established and you look through it, are you looking at the future or at the past? I'll wait. :) I think you are trying to fool me. If you have bent the time/space continuum to form the wormhole, you would be looking at the present. You'd think so wouldn't you? Guess again. :) Ok, I keep trying to think this through, and I keep coming up with is I am married to my Grandmother. Well, that is one possibility - unlikely, but a possibility. Here - I'll add to your confusion. There are two types of theoritical wormholes - Lorentzian wormholes and Einstein-Rosen bridges. The later is an unstable wormhole and would collapse the instant it was formed. Lorentzian wormholes are stable and theoritically possible. When formed by exotic matter you get a type of wormhole developed by Mike Morris for his PhD at Cal Tech. He and his supervisor, Kip Thorne developed a theory (called, as you would expect) a Morris-Thorne wormhole which are traversable (in theory) and there are theories which propose traversable Lorentzian wormholes without the exotic matter element. What all these theories maintain in common is that they maintain the rules of special relatively. While they allow faster than light travel, the travel is not necessarily faster than light. (Puzzle that one through - it does make sense when you parse the central idea.) And here's another interesting feature of the Lorentzian wormhole - while the individual traversing the wormhole would be traveling at lower than the speed of light, light still travels at the same speed meaning that any photon entering at the same time as the traveler would traverse the wormhole and arrive considerably earlier. Which begs the original question - are you seeing the future or the past? Side note: Just to really confuse things, if you accellerate one end of the wormhole and rotate it, you can actually prove that time travel is possible. But I digress. |
#15
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:01:18 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:52:11 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:35:43 -0500, Boater wrote: In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. Which is true as far as it goes. In this universe anyway. There have been recent experiments that prove we may live in more than one universe and up to as many as six at the same time. Einstein never accounted for those rules. :) I think Quantum Mechanics says there are an infinite number of universes. The fact that Einstein General Theory of Relativity does not agree with QM's is the reason physicists are looking for a Unified theory that would work on the grand scale and the atomic scale. I know the answer, but i am not telling. Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world - what Einstein did was extend Newtonian physics into three dimensions the third being time. In the Newtonian world, the laws were considered the same at any reference point in terms of time - it takes X time for Object A to travel to Object B or to put it another way, time is the same for all observers of an event no matter at which end of the observational platform one is observing from. Einstein proved that in fact, observers will and can experience time dilation depending on where the event is being observed from (think Doppler Shift) and a couple of other interesting effects such as length contraction and simultaneous relatively. Einstein didn't account for the possibility that instead of living in a three dimensional universe, we may actually live in a muti-dimensional universe. There have been several published experiments in which particles have been in two places at the same time and one of the more interesting ones, which has been duplicated, the particle appeared at it's destination before it left it's origin point. This would seem to indicate that there are more universes operating under more than Newtonian/Einsteinian laws than thought. Next time you want to ponder the universe, ponder this. Wormholes are theoritically possible -given enough power that is. It's pretty much strictly an engineering problem, not a problem with the theory. So, let's say you want to establish a worm hole from your living room to a high plateau on Omicron Persei 8 - a distance of one million light years. Now think about this - once the worm hole is established and you look through it, are you looking at the future or at the past? I'll wait. :) BTW, speaking Newton, how did the golf ball/base ball bat experiment go? 8) Well, as long as you asked, it went quite well. I proved conclusively that I can hit a golf ball further wtih a baseball bat than I can with a golf club. Film at 11:00? |
#16
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:42:45 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:01:18 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:52:11 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:35:43 -0500, Boater wrote: In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. Which is true as far as it goes. In this universe anyway. There have been recent experiments that prove we may live in more than one universe and up to as many as six at the same time. Einstein never accounted for those rules. :) I think Quantum Mechanics says there are an infinite number of universes. The fact that Einstein General Theory of Relativity does not agree with QM's is the reason physicists are looking for a Unified theory that would work on the grand scale and the atomic scale. I know the answer, but i am not telling. Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world - what Einstein did was extend Newtonian physics into three dimensions the third being time. In the Newtonian world, the laws were considered the same at any reference point in terms of time - it takes X time for Object A to travel to Object B or to put it another way, time is the same for all observers of an event no matter at which end of the observational platform one is observing from. Einstein proved that in fact, observers will and can experience time dilation depending on where the event is being observed from (think Doppler Shift) and a couple of other interesting effects such as length contraction and simultaneous relatively. Einstein didn't account for the possibility that instead of living in a three dimensional universe, we may actually live in a muti-dimensional universe. There have been several published experiments in which particles have been in two places at the same time and one of the more interesting ones, which has been duplicated, the particle appeared at it's destination before it left it's origin point. This would seem to indicate that there are more universes operating under more than Newtonian/Einsteinian laws than thought. Next time you want to ponder the universe, ponder this. Wormholes are theoritically possible -given enough power that is. It's pretty much strictly an engineering problem, not a problem with the theory. So, let's say you want to establish a worm hole from your living room to a high plateau on Omicron Persei 8 - a distance of one million light years. Now think about this - once the worm hole is established and you look through it, are you looking at the future or at the past? I'll wait. :) BTW, speaking Newton, how did the golf ball/base ball bat experiment go? 8) Well, as long as you asked, it went quite well. I proved conclusively that I can hit a golf ball further wtih a baseball bat than I can with a golf club. Film at 11:00? You missed the concept- I can do it. That means that I can't hit a golf ball with a golf club. I can hit a golf ball with a baseball bat. Thus, I can hit a golf ball further with a bat than a club. :) |
#17
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:42:45 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:01:18 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:52:11 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:35:43 -0500, Boater wrote: In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. Which is true as far as it goes. In this universe anyway. There have been recent experiments that prove we may live in more than one universe and up to as many as six at the same time. Einstein never accounted for those rules. :) I think Quantum Mechanics says there are an infinite number of universes. The fact that Einstein General Theory of Relativity does not agree with QM's is the reason physicists are looking for a Unified theory that would work on the grand scale and the atomic scale. I know the answer, but i am not telling. Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world - what Einstein did was extend Newtonian physics into three dimensions the third being time. In the Newtonian world, the laws were considered the same at any reference point in terms of time - it takes X time for Object A to travel to Object B or to put it another way, time is the same for all observers of an event no matter at which end of the observational platform one is observing from. Einstein proved that in fact, observers will and can experience time dilation depending on where the event is being observed from (think Doppler Shift) and a couple of other interesting effects such as length contraction and simultaneous relatively. Einstein didn't account for the possibility that instead of living in a three dimensional universe, we may actually live in a muti-dimensional universe. There have been several published experiments in which particles have been in two places at the same time and one of the more interesting ones, which has been duplicated, the particle appeared at it's destination before it left it's origin point. This would seem to indicate that there are more universes operating under more than Newtonian/Einsteinian laws than thought. Next time you want to ponder the universe, ponder this. Wormholes are theoritically possible -given enough power that is. It's pretty much strictly an engineering problem, not a problem with the theory. So, let's say you want to establish a worm hole from your living room to a high plateau on Omicron Persei 8 - a distance of one million light years. Now think about this - once the worm hole is established and you look through it, are you looking at the future or at the past? I'll wait. :) BTW, speaking Newton, how did the golf ball/base ball bat experiment go? 8) Well, as long as you asked, it went quite well. I proved conclusively that I can hit a golf ball further wtih a baseball bat than I can with a golf club. Film at 11:00? You missed the concept- I can do it. That means that I can't hit a golf ball with a golf club. I can hit a golf ball with a baseball bat. Thus, I can hit a golf ball further with a bat than a club. :) Oh I got the concept alright, just interested in the film. |
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:48:42 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:01:18 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote: "Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:52:11 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq." wrote: Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:35:43 -0500, Boater wrote: In other words, energy and mass are equivalent, as Einstein proposed in his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. Which is true as far as it goes. In this universe anyway. There have been recent experiments that prove we may live in more than one universe and up to as many as six at the same time. Einstein never accounted for those rules. :) I think Quantum Mechanics says there are an infinite number of universes. The fact that Einstein General Theory of Relativity does not agree with QM's is the reason physicists are looking for a Unified theory that would work on the grand scale and the atomic scale. I know the answer, but i am not telling. Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world - what Einstein did was extend Newtonian physics into three dimensions the third being time. In the Newtonian world, the laws were considered the same at any reference point in terms of time - it takes X time for Object A to travel to Object B or to put it another way, time is the same for all observers of an event no matter at which end of the observational platform one is observing from. Einstein proved that in fact, observers will and can experience time dilation depending on where the event is being observed from (think Doppler Shift) and a couple of other interesting effects such as length contraction and simultaneous relatively. Einstein didn't account for the possibility that instead of living in a three dimensional universe, we may actually live in a muti-dimensional universe. There have been several published experiments in which particles have been in two places at the same time and one of the more interesting ones, which has been duplicated, the particle appeared at it's destination before it left it's origin point. This would seem to indicate that there are more universes operating under more than Newtonian/Einsteinian laws than thought. Next time you want to ponder the universe, ponder this. Wormholes are theoritically possible -given enough power that is. It's pretty much strictly an engineering problem, not a problem with the theory. So, let's say you want to establish a worm hole from your living room to a high plateau on Omicron Persei 8 - a distance of one million light years. Now think about this - once the worm hole is established and you look through it, are you looking at the future or at the past? I'll wait. :) BTW, speaking Newton, how did the golf ball/base ball bat experiment go? 8) Well, as long as you asked, it went quite well. I proved conclusively that I can hit a golf ball further wtih a baseball bat than I can with a golf club. LOL! Most of the time I could also. -- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" |
#19
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
|
#20
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
e=mc2: 103 years later, Einstein's proven right
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:40:27 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: Newtonian physics exists in a two dimensional world That's just plain nuts. Casady |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT - men proven smarter than women | ASA | |||
Mooron's a proven Coward | ASA | |||
List of proven off shore cruisers? | Cruising | |||
Proven Wrong! | ASA |