On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:50:38 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Then, the Citi's chief executive officer, Vikram Pandit says, "We
appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market
stability."

Shouldn't he be thanking the American taxpayers?

Trust me on this, you really don't want Citi to fail. It would set
off a tidal wave of additional failures that would overwhelm the FDIC
and bring world trade to a halt. Excluding the sub-prime nonsense,
their basic business model is quite sound.

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:38:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:50:38 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Then, the Citi's chief executive officer, Vikram Pandit says, "We
appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market
stability."

Shouldn't he be thanking the American taxpayers?

Trust me on this, you really don't want Citi to fail. It would set off
a tidal wave of additional failures that would overwhelm the FDIC and
bring world trade to a halt. Excluding the sub-prime nonsense, their
basic business model is quite sound.

I could give a **** less if Citi Group fell on it's ass. If the ""business
model" were so good they wouldn't be where they are now and will be again
when they get a chance to walk with taxpayer monies.

Why trust crooks now?

By the way this will always remain "Bush's Crisis" no matter how many
fools try to spin it.

Only the folks that had no trade or true work ethics starved during the
great depression.

Let them eat dirt.

Learn to speak Chinese and/or Spanish.

Perhaps a plan for universal monetary values "world wide" like the Euro
but expanded.

Perhaps then many will recognize we are a secondary world power or lower
after the "Bush Vacation" and "Cronies Administration". Brought on
ourselves by invasion of Muslim countries to steal oil as a trade for
lives at "their command" because we lacked leadership.

We are overdue for some humility as a lesson.
Some deserve punishment. Maybe the ultimate form.

No apologies accepted.

"RLM" wrote in message
news

Only the folks that had no trade or true work ethics starved during the
great depression.

Let them eat dirt.

Learn to speak Chinese and/or Spanish.



Have to go on record here.
I don't agree with any of what you just said (above).

Eisboch

On Nov 24, 10:07*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"RLM" wrote in message

news


Only the folks that had no trade or true work ethics starved during the
great depression.

Let them eat dirt.

Learn to speak Chinese and/or Spanish.

Have to go on record here.
I don't agree with any of what you just said (above).

Eisboch

Same with me!

On Nov 24, 10:05*am, RLM wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:38:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:50:38 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Then, the Citi's chief executive officer, Vikram Pandit says, *"We
appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market
stability."

Shouldn't he be thanking the American taxpayers?

Trust me on this, you really don't want Citi to fail. * It would set off
a tidal wave of additional failures that would overwhelm the FDIC and
bring world trade to a halt. *Excluding the sub-prime nonsense, their
basic business model is quite sound.

I could give a **** less if Citi Group fell on it's ass. If the ""business
model" were so good they wouldn't be where they are now and will be again
when they get a chance to walk with taxpayer monies.

Why trust crooks now?

By the way this will always remain "Bush's Crisis" no matter how many
fools try to spin it.

What everyone seems to forget is that once the feds changed the
lending rules, banks had no choice but to grant loans to people that
fell within those rules. If they tried to hold their loans to a
higher standard, lawyers and the media would have been all over them
saying they were discriminating, right? You know it.

Three guesses who who profited from it the most in government, and who
in government protected the scheme. A lot of the "ill-gotten" profits
were just used effectively in an election.

And the beat goes on...

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:05:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:38:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:50:38 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Then, the Citi's chief executive officer, Vikram Pandit says, "We
appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market
stability."

Shouldn't he be thanking the American taxpayers?

Trust me on this, you really don't want Citi to fail. It would set off
a tidal wave of additional failures that would overwhelm the FDIC and
bring world trade to a halt. Excluding the sub-prime nonsense, their
basic business model is quite sound.

I could give a **** less if Citi Group fell on it's ass. If the ""business
model" were so good they wouldn't be where they are now and will be again
when they get a chance to walk with taxpayer monies.

Why trust crooks now?

By the way this will always remain "Bush's Crisis" no matter how many
fools try to spin it.

Only the folks that had no trade or true work ethics starved during the
great depression.

Let them eat dirt.

Learn to speak Chinese and/or Spanish.

Perhaps a plan for universal monetary values "world wide" like the Euro
but expanded.

Perhaps then many will recognize we are a secondary world power or lower
after the "Bush Vacation" and "Cronies Administration". Brought on
ourselves by invasion of Muslim countries to steal oil as a trade for
lives at "their command" because we lacked leadership.

We are overdue for some humility as a lesson.
Some deserve punishment. Maybe the ultimate form.

No apologies accepted.

The above is just stupid.
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:40:49 -0500, JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:05:34 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:38:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:50:38 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Then, the Citi's chief executive officer, Vikram Pandit says, "We
appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market
stability."

Shouldn't he be thanking the American taxpayers?

Trust me on this, you really don't want Citi to fail. It would set off
a tidal wave of additional failures that would overwhelm the FDIC and
bring world trade to a halt. Excluding the sub-prime nonsense, their
basic business model is quite sound.

I could give a **** less if Citi Group fell on it's ass. If the ""business
model" were so good they wouldn't be where they are now and will be again
when they get a chance to walk with taxpayer monies.

Why trust crooks now?

By the way this will always remain "Bush's Crisis" no matter how many
fools try to spin it.

Only the folks that had no trade or true work ethics starved during the
great depression.

Let them eat dirt.

Learn to speak Chinese and/or Spanish.

Perhaps a plan for universal monetary values "world wide" like the Euro
but expanded.

Perhaps then many will recognize we are a secondary world power or lower
after the "Bush Vacation" and "Cronies Administration". Brought on
ourselves by invasion of Muslim countries to steal oil as a trade for
lives at "their command" because we lacked leadership.

We are overdue for some humility as a lesson.
Some deserve punishment. Maybe the ultimate form.

No apologies accepted.

The above is just stupid.

I accept the compliment from an idiot that only follows others. Shame you
never have an original thought, but years of having decisions made for you
cripple your thought process.

Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:50:38 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Then, the Citi's chief executive officer, Vikram Pandit says, "We
appreciate the tremendous effort by the government to assure market
stability."

Shouldn't he be thanking the American taxpayers?

Trust me on this, you really don't want Citi to fail. It would set
off a tidal wave of additional failures that would overwhelm the FDIC
and bring world trade to a halt. Excluding the sub-prime nonsense,
their basic business model is quite sound.
,
World Trade is defined as American financing debt for China imports,
from Global Banking swindlers and loan sharks with unilateral contracts.
Americans are denied the protection f Law and the Courts in dealing with
Business under Mandatory ?Binding Arbitration clauses.
Banking writes the variable contracts and can modify or change any and
all terms without Citizens consent.
This is Globalism. It is about eliminating America's soverignty. It is
about ignoring or rewritting Americans Law protecting Citizens. It is
about world government by Business for the wealth and power of what is
referred to as the Globabl Ruling Economic Aristocracy.
Our Government answers to Wall Street and the Fed. If you are not
Corporate you are little People.
George Bush said he was a Globalist. This is his "mandate?"