Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:53:55 -0500, Boater wrote:
...ended up with the Tamron f/2.8 70-200. After a day of testing one, I couldn't see any difference between its shots and ones taken with the corresponding Nikkor lens. The build quality on the Nikkor is a skosh better, but not enough to make a diff to me. Plus the Tammy is lighter and the zoom is internal. Half the price, too. Sure hope it fits your wife's Cannon. Damn but she's good with that thing. Even the pictures you took and posted in Chuck's Place were pretty good. You'd surely need nothing further! -- John H. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who's at fault here | Cruising | |||
Who's fault is it? | General | |||
Bush's fault | ASA |