![]() |
|
The rich are suffering, too.
November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. According to a new survey by Prince & Assoc., more than 80% of multimillionaires who had extra-marital lovers planned to cut back on their gifts and allowances. Still, only 12% of the multimillionaire cheaters said they plan to give up on their lovers altogether for financial reasons. “Rich people are getting hit, and they’re all expressing the need to curtail unnecessary spending,” said Russ Alan Prince, president of Prince & Assoc., a wealth-research firm based in Connecticut. “Lovers are part of the same calculation.” Of course, any study of millionaires and their mistresses should be taken with a large grain of salt. The survey–a subset of a larger wealth study–polled 191 individuals with a minimum net worth of $20 million who said they had lovers of at least a year or more (this to screen out the one-night stands, etc.). About two thirds of the respondents were men and one third women. All were married and all had personal control over their finances, meaning the women and men surveyed were the primary wealth holders in their homes. The most surprising stats in the study relate to gender and what might be termed “length of service.” Fully 82% of men in the study said they planned to lower the allowances to their mistresses, while more than three quarters planned to provide fewer gifts, less expensive gifts and fewer perks, like jet rides, resort vacations and top restaurant meals. Women were far more generous to their paramours in the face of financial crises. Less than 20% planned to lower allowances, gifts and perks, while more than half planned to raise them. Susan Shapiro Barash, who teaches gender studies at Marymount Manhattan College and wrote “Little White Lies, Deep Dark Secrets,” about why women lie, said women value their lovers more than men in a time of economic trouble. “For the women, lovers matter more than ever now because the rest of life is so dreary,” she said. “For the men, they’re just cutting across the board.” Ms. Barash added that women may value their lovers more today because their husbands are so miserable. “If your husband lost his job on Wall Street and he’s miserable, you need the escape,” she says. The duration of the relationship also seems to play a role in the economics of high-end cavorting. The study found that more than two thirds of the millionaires who had been with their lovers for three or more years planned to cut back. That compares with less than half for those with a tenure of one to three years. “What we found in talking to the respondents is that the magic of the relationship with their lover fades after a while, so they’re more willing to let them go,” Mr. Prince says. The survey doesn’t mean to suggest that all, most or even a large minority of rich men and women have affairs. It simply is a snapshot of a certain sample at a certain time. Yet it suggests that in a time of financial crisis, it is better to be a kept man than a compensated woman. |
The rich are suffering, too.
Everything is relative. Some would say Harry Krause is rich. If you
didn't spend so much time feeling sorry for yourself, you might enjoy your own riches instead of being such a sour ass and grousing about EVERYTHING. |
The rich are suffering, too.
jim wrote:
Everything is relative. Some would say Harry Krause is rich. If you didn't spend so much time feeling sorry for yourself, you might enjoy your own riches instead of being such a sour ass and grousing about EVERYTHING. Sorry, I'm *not* monetarily rich. I also don't feel sorry for myself. |
The rich are suffering, too.
Boater wrote:
jim wrote: Everything is relative. Some would say Harry Krause is rich. If you didn't spend so much time feeling sorry for yourself, you might enjoy your own riches instead of being such a sour ass and grousing about EVERYTHING. Sorry, I'm *not* monetarily rich. I also don't feel sorry for myself. Stashes of gold, Condos in Florida, Farms in Virginia,Large property in Maryland, and a red barn somewhere. You're rich buddy, considering some folks don't have a roof over their head. You don't have any excuses for being such a sour ass. And no reason to be grousing about EVERYTHING, buddy. |
The rich are suffering, too.
jim wrote:
Boater wrote: jim wrote: Everything is relative. Some would say Harry Krause is rich. If you didn't spend so much time feeling sorry for yourself, you might enjoy your own riches instead of being such a sour ass and grousing about EVERYTHING. Sorry, I'm *not* monetarily rich. I also don't feel sorry for myself. Stashes of gold, Condos in Florida, Farms in Virginia,Large property in Maryland, and a red barn somewhere. You're rich buddy, considering some folks don't have a roof over their head. You don't have any excuses for being such a sour ass. And no reason to be grousing about EVERYTHING, buddy. Stashes of gold could be no more than a sockful of coins. Condos come in all sizes. Ahh, the red barn...well, it's not the sort of barn you'd want to store anything valuable in, as it is in danger of falling over on itself at any moment. I think the paint holds it together. But a number of neighborhood critters call it home in the winter. |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:22:55 -0500, Boater wrote:
more cut'n'paste ****. Harry, did you know I subscribe to the Washington Post because their plastic bags are great for picking up dog ****? Now *that* is something worth posting about! -- John H. |
The rich are suffering, too.
"Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch |
The rich are suffering, too.
Boater wrote:
jim wrote: Boater wrote: jim wrote: Everything is relative. Some would say Harry Krause is rich. If you didn't spend so much time feeling sorry for yourself, you might enjoy your own riches instead of being such a sour ass and grousing about EVERYTHING. Sorry, I'm *not* monetarily rich. I also don't feel sorry for myself. Stashes of gold, Condos in Florida, Farms in Virginia,Large property in Maryland, and a red barn somewhere. You're rich buddy, considering some folks don't have a roof over their head. You don't have any excuses for being such a sour ass. And no reason to be grousing about EVERYTHING, buddy. Stashes of gold could be no more than a sockful of coins. Condos come in all sizes. Ahh, the red barn...well, it's not the sort of barn you'd want to store anything valuable in, as it is in danger of falling over on itself at any moment. I think the paint holds it together. But a number of neighborhood critters call it home in the winter. Where is that barn, by the way. I couldn't find it on the inventory sheet. |
The rich are suffering, too.
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:22:55 -0500, Boater wrote: more cut'n'paste ****. Harry, did you know I subscribe to the Washington Post because their plastic bags are great for picking up dog ****? Now *that* is something worth posting about! No one is surrounded by more **** than you are. You exude it. |
The rich are suffering, too.
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:45:14 -0500, Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:22:55 -0500, Boater wrote: more cut'n'paste ****. Harry, did you know I subscribe to the Washington Post because their plastic bags are great for picking up dog ****? Now *that* is something worth posting about! No one is surrounded by more **** than you are. You exude it. Such rancor! Bad day at the mirror today? -- John H. |
The rich are suffering, too.
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've spewed today! They could take you along for ballast. |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've spewed today! -- John H. |
The rich are suffering, too.
Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Can we count on you to supply the intel? You did say you worked for a military intelligence outfit, didn't you? |
The rich are suffering, too.
jim wrote:
Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Can we count on you to supply the intel? You did say you worked for a military intelligence outfit, didn't you? There wasn't much intelligence in that agency then, or now. |
The rich are suffering, too.
Boater wrote:
jim wrote: Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Can we count on you to supply the intel? You did say you worked for a military intelligence outfit, didn't you? There wasn't much intelligence in that agency then, or now. Can I quote you. You and Donny have come out with some gems today. |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 10:22*am, Boater wrote:
* November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 11:57*am, JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:45:14 -0500, Boater wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:22:55 -0500, Boater wrote: more cut'n'paste ****. Harry, did you know I subscribe to the Washington Post because their plastic bags are great for picking up dog ****? Now *that* is something worth posting about! No one is surrounded by more **** than you are. You exude it. Such rancor! Bad day at the mirror today? -- John H. Awe, you know John, he's just a vulgar old fat low life. |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 11:42*am, jim wrote:
Boater wrote: jim wrote: Boater wrote: jim wrote: Everything is relative. Some would say Harry Krause is rich. If you didn't spend so much time feeling sorry for yourself, you might enjoy your own riches instead of being such a sour ass and grousing about EVERYTHING. Sorry, I'm *not* monetarily rich. I also don't feel sorry for myself. Stashes of gold, Condos in Florida, Farms in Virginia,Large property in Maryland, and a red barn somewhere. You're rich buddy, considering some folks don't have a roof over their head. You don't have any excuses for being such a sour ass. And no reason to be grousing about EVERYTHING, buddy. Stashes of gold could be no more than a sockful of coins. Condos come in all sizes. Ahh, the red barn...well, it's not the sort of barn you'd want to store anything valuable in, as it is in danger of falling over on itself at any moment. I think the paint holds it together. But a number of neighborhood critters call it home in the winter. Where is that barn, by the way. I couldn't find it on the inventory sheet..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - For some reason it doesn't show up on Google Earth, neither! |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 11:13*am, Boater wrote:
jim wrote: Boater wrote: jim wrote: Everything is relative. Some would say Harry Krause is rich. If you didn't spend so much time feeling sorry for yourself, you might enjoy your own riches instead of being such a sour ass and grousing about EVERYTHING. Sorry, I'm *not* monetarily rich. I also don't feel sorry for myself. Stashes of gold, Condos in Florida, Farms in Virginia,Large property in Maryland, and a red barn somewhere. You're rich buddy, considering some folks don't have a roof over their head. You don't have any excuses for being such a sour ass. And no reason to be grousing about EVERYTHING, buddy. Stashes of gold could be no more than a sockful of coins. Condos come in all sizes. Ahh, the red barn...well, it's not the sort of barn you'd want to store anything valuable in, as it is in danger of falling over on itself at any moment. I think the paint holds it together. But a number of neighborhood critters call it home in the winter.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What about the millions you made from the sale of that marina? What about your 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat? |
The rich are suffering, too.
"Boater" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've spewed today! They could take you along for ballast. ...or bait......... |
The rich are suffering, too.
Don White wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've spewed today! They could take you along for ballast. ..or bait......... There must be regulations against fish poisoning... |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 12:36*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Nov 19, 10:22*am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems.... |
The rich are suffering, too.
|
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:15:47 -0500, Boater wrote:
Don White wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've spewed today! They could take you along for ballast. ..or bait......... There must be regulations against fish poisoning... Please send Donnie a 'Thank You' card! At least he's nice to you. -- John H. |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 1:23*pm, wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:36*pm, wf3h wrote: On Nov 19, 10:22*am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, actually it was. it was paulson who proposed it. it was mccain who suspended his campaign to support it it was bush who told the congress that we needed it. so, yeah, it was the GOP. then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems sorry sport. this happened as a result of phil gramm and his wife. they're in love with the mexican economy...a few rich folks at the top everyone else washes windows |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:32:42 -0800 (PST), wf3h
wrote: actually it was. it was paulson who proposed it. it was mccain who suspended his campaign to support it it was bush who told the congress that we needed it. so, yeah, it was the GOP. then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems sorry sport. this happened as a result of phil gramm and his wife. they're in love with the mexican economy...a few rich folks at the top everyone else washes windows Whoa. I though most window-washers were illegal aliens. Everybody else can do landscaping......whoa. --Vic |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 1:26*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote: On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems.... Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto plant.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I was a hourly Port Fuel Injection specialist.. Sorry to expose another one of your bull**** lies... |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 1:26*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote: On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems.... Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto plant.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And as to chops, you don't even have the chops to answer your door, hiding under your desk like some yappy little mutt.. |
The rich are suffering, too.
|
The rich are suffering, too.
|
The rich are suffering, too.
|
The rich are suffering, too.
|
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 7:01*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 19, 1:26 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote: On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems.... Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto plant.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And as to chops, you don't even have the chops to answer your door, hiding under your desk like some yappy little mutt.. What are you raving about? If I'm home and the doorbell rings, I answer it. I do check the security camera first, to see if I need to answer the door "heeled." * :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, are we back to your widdou cap gun, holster, pwastic hat and badge. You know, the ones you use to "shoot the wapids"? ;) |
The rich are suffering, too.
wrote:
On Nov 19, 7:01 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 19, 1:26 pm, Boater wrote: wrote: On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote: On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote: November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems.... Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto plant.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And as to chops, you don't even have the chops to answer your door, hiding under your desk like some yappy little mutt.. What are you raving about? If I'm home and the doorbell rings, I answer it. I do check the security camera first, to see if I need to answer the door "heeled." :)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh, are we back to your widdou cap gun, holster, pwastic hat and badge. You know, the ones you use to "shoot the wapids"? ;) Bang on my front door late at night, and if you aren't someone I know or in full cop regalia, you'll see how little my cap gun is. Maybe this one...which is heavy enough to bust a skull wide open if the mag is empty. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...us/x-five1.jpg |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:44:55 -0500, Boater
wrote: Bang on my front door late at night, and if you aren't someone I know or in full cop regalia, you'll see how little my cap gun is. Maybe this one...which is heavy enough to bust a skull wide open if the mag is empty. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...us/x-five1.jpg That's a Tinker Toy. I got this. http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/n...t/IMG_0195.jpg --Vic |
The rich are suffering, too.
Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:44:55 -0500, Boater wrote: Bang on my front door late at night, and if you aren't someone I know or in full cop regalia, you'll see how little my cap gun is. Maybe this one...which is heavy enough to bust a skull wide open if the mag is empty. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...us/x-five1.jpg That's a Tinker Toy. I got this. http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/n...t/IMG_0195.jpg --Vic An alien! |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:10:49 -0500, Boater
wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:44:55 -0500, Boater wrote: Bang on my front door late at night, and if you aren't someone I know or in full cop regalia, you'll see how little my cap gun is. Maybe this one...which is heavy enough to bust a skull wide open if the mag is empty. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...us/x-five1.jpg That's a Tinker Toy. I got this. http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/n...t/IMG_0195.jpg --Vic An alien! That's all? Thought we could talk about lenses. Maybe Reggie could do some kind of pixel count or whatever. Some discussion about lighting and photoshopping. Then segue to geetars, amps and motor sickles. OTOH.....never mind. Time to take out the mutts. --Vic |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 10:02*pm, Vic Smith
wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:44:55 -0500, Boater wrote: Bang on my front door late at night, and if you aren't someone I know or in full cop regalia, you'll see how little my cap gun is. Maybe this one...which is heavy enough to bust a skull wide open if the mag is empty. http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...us/x-five1.jpg That's a Tinker Toy. *I got this. http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/n...t/IMG_0195.jpg --Vic Oh hell, I can google up a better picture of someone elses weapon than Harry... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com