![]() |
The rich are suffering, too.
"Boater" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've spewed today! They could take you along for ballast. ...or bait......... |
The rich are suffering, too.
Don White wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've spewed today! They could take you along for ballast. ..or bait......... There must be regulations against fish poisoning... |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 12:36*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Nov 19, 10:22*am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems.... |
The rich are suffering, too.
|
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:15:47 -0500, Boater wrote:
Don White wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:55:28 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ I wonder who funded this study. Just think. Instead of studying this, a donation to the Navy could have been made to buy at least two rigid hulled inflatables to combat Somalian Pirates. Eisboch Weren't you in the navy? Why not link up with FloridaJim and SW Tom, who has a fast assault boat, and save the taxpayers a lot of money and aggravation. Surely one of you could fire a shotgun without killing the other two boys. Well, Harry, that *does* make more sense than the rest of the **** you've spewed today! They could take you along for ballast. ..or bait......... There must be regulations against fish poisoning... Please send Donnie a 'Thank You' card! At least he's nice to you. -- John H. |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 1:23*pm, wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:36*pm, wf3h wrote: On Nov 19, 10:22*am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, actually it was. it was paulson who proposed it. it was mccain who suspended his campaign to support it it was bush who told the congress that we needed it. so, yeah, it was the GOP. then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems sorry sport. this happened as a result of phil gramm and his wife. they're in love with the mexican economy...a few rich folks at the top everyone else washes windows |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:32:42 -0800 (PST), wf3h
wrote: actually it was. it was paulson who proposed it. it was mccain who suspended his campaign to support it it was bush who told the congress that we needed it. so, yeah, it was the GOP. then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems sorry sport. this happened as a result of phil gramm and his wife. they're in love with the mexican economy...a few rich folks at the top everyone else washes windows Whoa. I though most window-washers were illegal aliens. Everybody else can do landscaping......whoa. --Vic |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 1:26*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote: On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems.... Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto plant.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, I was a hourly Port Fuel Injection specialist.. Sorry to expose another one of your bull**** lies... |
The rich are suffering, too.
On Nov 19, 1:26*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote: On Nov 19, 12:36 pm, wf3h wrote: On Nov 19, 10:22 am, Boater wrote: * November 18, 2008, 11:20 am Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses WSJ You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses. i suggest we start a fund. collect money for millionaires so they can continue to support their mistresses. perhaps we should fund it with tax dollars.... oh...wait...there is such a group. it's called the 'republican party'. sorry...my mistake. Yeah, it was that controlling repubican party that just voted 700 billion to the credit card companies so they could buy banks and monopolize the industry, then up the rates on everyone else, or maybe it's the repubs who want to throw another 50 billion at the auto unions as payoff for getting King Obama elected, oh wait, that doesn't make sense.. cause it was the dems.... Don't worry...you don't have the skills or the chops to work at an auto plant.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And as to chops, you don't even have the chops to answer your door, hiding under your desk like some yappy little mutt.. |
The rich are suffering, too.
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com