Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:59:53 +0000, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7735144.stm While true that you can't turn a, say, tanker into a battleship, you certainly have the right by international law to protect yourself, the cargo and the vessel. If that means carying anti-tank weapons, automatic rifles or hiring mercenaries to protect you, your cargo and your ship, that's perfectly legal. Absolutely, but protecting yourself is only a band-aid. If you want to drastically reduce piracy, you have to take it to them, keep them locked up in port. A few ships blockading their home ports, is worth many ships on the high seas. However, under international law, a blockade is illegal, and whether we like it or not, we do have an obligation to follow international law. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:59:53 +0000, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7735144.stm While true that you can't turn a, say, tanker into a battleship, you certainly have the right by international law to protect yourself, the cargo and the vessel. If that means carying anti-tank weapons, automatic rifles or hiring mercenaries to protect you, your cargo and your ship, that's perfectly legal. Absolutely, but protecting yourself is only a band-aid. If you want to drastically reduce piracy, you have to take it to them, keep them locked up in port. A few ships blockading their home ports, is worth many ships on the high seas. However, under international law, a blockade is illegal, and whether we like it or not, we do have an obligation to follow international law. Pirate ships don't come from "home" ports. A mother ship can stay off shore for years being replenished by smaller boats from villages and beaches. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My gosh!
That tanker looks like it holds more under the water than above! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph...r_1115972c.jpg i wonder what the balast is like when it's empty? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
My gosh! That tanker looks like it holds more under the water than above! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph...r_1115972c.jpg i wonder what the balast is like when it's empty? The question is how much sea water do they have to take on to make the vessel sea worthy on its voyage back to the gulf to get refilled with oil? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Selling a boat? News on the latest counterfeit check scam... | General | |||
Latest news on Chesapeake Bay - not good! | General |