Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... I'm supposed to be impressed by our massive array of ships? What, precisely, are they doing at the moment? Not much. Most importantly, maintaining a balance of power, deterrence and top stop training to be prepared at any moment for any global situation. Other than that, nothing important. Please don't argue that we don't have a balance of power obligation. Our security, indeed much of the world's depends on it. If the day ever comes when another nation ever thinks it can militarily defeat us, the first part of the battle will have been lost and we'll be obligated to prove to them how wrong they were. It's better to never have them develop the confidence to try. The blue water Navy is tested virtually everyday when at sea. The testing is not always being done by us. I, nor many others, I suspect, could care less if you are impressed or not. It doesn't matter. I understand the mission and the purpose, I believe in it and I thank God we have it, even if it helps provide security to armchair whiners like you. Eisboch Sorry...I don't buy into the 8' asparagus of the military. I'm not suggesting we do away with it. I just believe that the nature of today's threats have made our military...less relevant. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:38:20 -0500, Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... I'm supposed to be impressed by our massive array of ships? What, precisely, are they doing at the moment? Not much. Most importantly, maintaining a balance of power, deterrence and top stop training to be prepared at any moment for any global situation. Other than that, nothing important. Please don't argue that we don't have a balance of power obligation. Our security, indeed much of the world's depends on it. If the day ever comes when another nation ever thinks it can militarily defeat us, the first part of the battle will have been lost and we'll be obligated to prove to them how wrong they were. It's better to never have them develop the confidence to try. The blue water Navy is tested virtually everyday when at sea. The testing is not always being done by us. I, nor many others, I suspect, could care less if you are impressed or not. It doesn't matter. I understand the mission and the purpose, I believe in it and I thank God we have it, even if it helps provide security to armchair whiners like you. Eisboch Sorry...I don't buy into the 8' asparagus of the military. I'm not suggesting we do away with it. I just believe that the nature of today's threats have made our military...less relevant. Harry, you probably don't realize this, but the last few responses to you by Eisboch were *not* compliments. You need to get your head out of wherever it is. -- John H. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:38:20 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... I'm supposed to be impressed by our massive array of ships? What, precisely, are they doing at the moment? Not much. Most importantly, maintaining a balance of power, deterrence and top stop training to be prepared at any moment for any global situation. Other than that, nothing important. Please don't argue that we don't have a balance of power obligation. Our security, indeed much of the world's depends on it. If the day ever comes when another nation ever thinks it can militarily defeat us, the first part of the battle will have been lost and we'll be obligated to prove to them how wrong they were. It's better to never have them develop the confidence to try. The blue water Navy is tested virtually everyday when at sea. The testing is not always being done by us. I, nor many others, I suspect, could care less if you are impressed or not. It doesn't matter. I understand the mission and the purpose, I believe in it and I thank God we have it, even if it helps provide security to armchair whiners like you. Eisboch Sorry...I don't buy into the 8' asparagus of the military. I'm not suggesting we do away with it. I just believe that the nature of today's threats have made our military...less relevant. Harry, you probably don't realize this, but the last few responses to you by Eisboch were *not* compliments. You need to get your head out of wherever it is. D'oh. I've been consistently against wasting taxpayer dollars on the military and its toys. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:56:30 -0500, Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:38:20 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... I'm supposed to be impressed by our massive array of ships? What, precisely, are they doing at the moment? Not much. Most importantly, maintaining a balance of power, deterrence and top stop training to be prepared at any moment for any global situation. Other than that, nothing important. Please don't argue that we don't have a balance of power obligation. Our security, indeed much of the world's depends on it. If the day ever comes when another nation ever thinks it can militarily defeat us, the first part of the battle will have been lost and we'll be obligated to prove to them how wrong they were. It's better to never have them develop the confidence to try. The blue water Navy is tested virtually everyday when at sea. The testing is not always being done by us. I, nor many others, I suspect, could care less if you are impressed or not. It doesn't matter. I understand the mission and the purpose, I believe in it and I thank God we have it, even if it helps provide security to armchair whiners like you. Eisboch Sorry...I don't buy into the 8' asparagus of the military. I'm not suggesting we do away with it. I just believe that the nature of today's threats have made our military...less relevant. Harry, you probably don't realize this, but the last few responses to you by Eisboch were *not* compliments. You need to get your head out of wherever it is. D'oh. I've been consistently against wasting taxpayer dollars on the military and its toys. D'oh, you've been a consistent joke. D'oh. -- John H. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:38:20 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... I'm supposed to be impressed by our massive array of ships? What, precisely, are they doing at the moment? Not much. Most importantly, maintaining a balance of power, deterrence and top stop training to be prepared at any moment for any global situation. Other than that, nothing important. Please don't argue that we don't have a balance of power obligation. Our security, indeed much of the world's depends on it. If the day ever comes when another nation ever thinks it can militarily defeat us, the first part of the battle will have been lost and we'll be obligated to prove to them how wrong they were. It's better to never have them develop the confidence to try. The blue water Navy is tested virtually everyday when at sea. The testing is not always being done by us. I, nor many others, I suspect, could care less if you are impressed or not. It doesn't matter. I understand the mission and the purpose, I believe in it and I thank God we have it, even if it helps provide security to armchair whiners like you. Eisboch Sorry...I don't buy into the 8' asparagus of the military. I'm not suggesting we do away with it. I just believe that the nature of today's threats have made our military...less relevant. Harry, you probably don't realize this, but the last few responses to you by Eisboch were *not* compliments. You need to get your head out of wherever it is. We've been taking up all of Harry's time this morning. How do you expect the man to make a living writing jingles when we keep distracting him. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 19, 12:00*pm, jim wrote:
JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:38:20 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... I'm supposed to be impressed by our massive array of ships? What, precisely, are they doing at the moment? Not much. Most importantly, maintaining a balance of power, deterrence and top stop training to be prepared at any moment for any global situation. * Other than that, nothing important. Please don't argue that we don't have a balance of power obligation. *Our security, indeed much of the world's depends on it. *If the day ever comes when another nation ever thinks it can militarily defeat us, the first part of the battle will have been lost and we'll be obligated to prove to them how wrong they were. *It's better to never have them develop the confidence to try. The blue water Navy is tested virtually everyday when at sea. The testing is not always being done by us. I, nor many others, I suspect, could care less if you are impressed or not. It doesn't matter. * I understand the mission and the purpose, I believe in it and I thank God we have it, even if it helps provide security to armchair whiners like you. Eisboch Sorry...I don't buy into the 8' asparagus of the military. I'm not suggesting we do away with it. I just believe that the nature of today's threats have made our military...less relevant. Harry, you probably don't realize this, but the last few responses to you by Eisboch were *not* compliments. You need to get your head out of wherever it is. We've been taking up all of Harry's time this morning. How do you expect the man to make a living writing jingles when we keep distracting him.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry doesn't work! Except when his wife gets home from the local union hall. Then he has to get her supper. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 19, 1:18*pm, wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:00*pm, jim wrote: JohnH wrote: On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:38:20 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... I'm supposed to be impressed by our massive array of ships? What, precisely, are they doing at the moment? Not much. Most importantly, maintaining a balance of power, deterrence and top stop training to be prepared at any moment for any global situation. * Other than that, nothing important. Please don't argue that we don't have a balance of power obligation.. *Our security, indeed much of the world's depends on it. *If the day ever comes when another nation ever thinks it can militarily defeat us, the first part of the battle will have been lost and we'll be obligated to prove to them how wrong they were. *It's better to never have them develop the confidence to try. The blue water Navy is tested virtually everyday when at sea. The testing is not always being done by us. I, nor many others, I suspect, could care less if you are impressed or not. It doesn't matter. * I understand the mission and the purpose, I believe in it and I thank God we have it, even if it helps provide security to armchair whiners like you. Eisboch Sorry...I don't buy into the 8' asparagus of the military. I'm not suggesting we do away with it. I just believe that the nature of today's threats have made our military...less relevant. Harry, you probably don't realize this, but the last few responses to you by Eisboch were *not* compliments. You need to get your head out of wherever it is. We've been taking up all of Harry's time this morning. How do you expect the man to make a living writing jingles when we keep distracting him.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry doesn't work! Except when his wife gets home from the local union hall. Then he has to get her supper.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry has no solutions cause he doesn't have the balls to actually take a stand. He will wait till it's over then jump on the wagon.. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boater" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... I'm supposed to be impressed by our massive array of ships? What, precisely, are they doing at the moment? Not much. Most importantly, maintaining a balance of power, deterrence and top stop training to be prepared at any moment for any global situation. Other than that, nothing important. Please don't argue that we don't have a balance of power obligation. Our security, indeed much of the world's depends on it. If the day ever comes when another nation ever thinks it can militarily defeat us, the first part of the battle will have been lost and we'll be obligated to prove to them how wrong they were. It's better to never have them develop the confidence to try. The blue water Navy is tested virtually everyday when at sea. The testing is not always being done by us. I, nor many others, I suspect, could care less if you are impressed or not. It doesn't matter. I understand the mission and the purpose, I believe in it and I thank God we have it, even if it helps provide security to armchair whiners like you. Eisboch Sorry...I don't buy into the 8' asparagus of the military. I'm not suggesting we do away with it. I just believe that the nature of today's threats have made our military...less relevant. Would you like to see it become very relevant? Make it obsolete. Eisboch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Selling a boat? News on the latest counterfeit check scam... | General | |||
Latest news on Chesapeake Bay - not good! | General |