Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
krj wrote:
Gm1234 wrote: "tlindly" wrote RG8 [not 6] is MUCH bigger in diameter than RG58. RG58 is also much mor flexable. But I wouldn't recommend it for this length, unless a very sharp bend is absolutely necessary. tom Besides that, if you ran RG8 on an 18ft Capri, it would likely turn turtle! Always minimise weight aloft on a sailing vessel! GM Might make a good mizzen mast? Unstayed??? There is a good calculator for coax losses at http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm A 25W VHF at 156 mhz with 40 ft of RG-58 will have 15.819W at the antenna. With RG-8X it will be 16.741W. With RG-8U it will be 19.859W. Assuming a VSWR of 1.3 krj Well, considering all aspects of this, RG8 foam core - WELL SEALED might be the best choice for me. Now, how to seal up the connectors? Adhesive lined heat shrink may be fine for the top one, but the deck connector? That one has to come apart occasionally. And, it's probably the one most exposed to the spray... |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look up Tommy Tape. It is a self amalgamating plastic tape. You stretch it
as it is applied which frees up the adhesive. Makes a very watertight seal. Just cut it off when you need to disconnect the cable. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "cavelamb himself" wrote in message ink.net... krj wrote: Gm1234 wrote: "tlindly" wrote RG8 [not 6] is MUCH bigger in diameter than RG58. RG58 is also much mor flexable. But I wouldn't recommend it for this length, unless a very sharp bend is absolutely necessary. tom Besides that, if you ran RG8 on an 18ft Capri, it would likely turn turtle! Always minimise weight aloft on a sailing vessel! GM Might make a good mizzen mast? Unstayed??? There is a good calculator for coax losses at http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm A 25W VHF at 156 mhz with 40 ft of RG-58 will have 15.819W at the antenna. With RG-8X it will be 16.741W. With RG-8U it will be 19.859W. Assuming a VSWR of 1.3 krj Well, considering all aspects of this, RG8 foam core - WELL SEALED might be the best choice for me. Now, how to seal up the connectors? Adhesive lined heat shrink may be fine for the top one, but the deck connector? That one has to come apart occasionally. And, it's probably the one most exposed to the spray... |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:02:42 GMT, cavelamb himself
wrote: krj wrote: Might make a good mizzen mast? Unstayed??? There is a good calculator for coax losses at http://www.ocarc.ca/coax.htm A 25W VHF at 156 mhz with 40 ft of RG-58 will have 15.819W at the antenna. With RG-8X it will be 16.741W. With RG-8U it will be 19.859W. Assuming a VSWR of 1.3 Like many people have said, 15 or 20 watts and you cannot hear the difference. It is antenna height that matters as far as range is concerned. Masthead installation means antenna us way up, but hard to fix if something goes wrong. And most likely extra connectors, as you would need to detach the antenna when you take your mast down. My VHF antenna is only some 3 meters above deck. Permanent installation and therefore less maintenance problems. Coast guard stations 20-30 nautical miles away come in strong since they have antennas way up in tower, and I can hear and work anything within visible horizon. If you dont go far offshore, this is enough for emergency communcations etc. Well, considering all aspects of this, RG8 foam core - WELL SEALED might be the best choice for me. Foam is great for fixed installations such as your ham radio antenna at home. But I wouldnt use foam for boating installations. Any bends etc, and center could eventually short circut with shield. Now, how to seal up the connectors? Adhesive lined heat shrink may be fine for the top one, but the deck connector? That one has to come apart occasionally. I used just electrican´s tape with masthead antenna installation on my previous boat. Takes is few minutes to seal up in spring and take off in fall. If connectors corrode, you can clean the surface or even replace them every few years. Leave somewhere a few extra inches of cable so you can replace connectors. But make sure you seal cable and connector so that water will not enter cable. Its not a disaster if contact surface corrodes a bit, but any leak and coax will be filled with water. Still OK to your DC meter, but water in cable spells very high losses in HF and VHF, nothing like in line loss calculations when different cable types vere compared. Cable filled with water is better thrown away. Mika -- ---------------------------------------------------- Haluatko lähettää postia? Vaihda osoitteen eka (vai oliko se toka?) numero vitonen numeroksi kahdeksan... ---------------------------------------------------- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SSB Antenna theory | Electronics | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Cruising | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Electronics | |||
VHF cable type? | Cruising | |||
How to use a simple SWR meter and what it means to your VHF | Electronics |