Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One point Larry missed: That big array will focus the transmit power available.
So 4 KW with a small array will get the same range as 2KW with a small array. Right Larry? Also: even in typical power boat, how often do you care about traffic more than a mile a or two away? I'd rather have really good results close in and NOTHING more than a couple of miles away (I do boat in an area where there's very little BIG boat traffic. Maybe a dozen cruise ships a year, and they come in after my boat's on the trailer on the way home, and leave while I'm diving. "Larry" wrote in message ... "luc" wrote in news:1162924151.581326.150280 @m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com: A few questions. Is there another small radar that is good? You get what you pay for. It's that simple. More power has more range..IF it's up high. It can't see over the horizon. Its horizon is the same as yours on a clear day. The difference is it can see through fog and in the dark. The stronger its transmitter, the stronger its returns from the targets and the strong transmitter making stronger returns can see more at the same distance in bad weather. Read that, smaller targets, too. Is the quality of the radar directly related to the size of the radome? The larger the antenna array, the narrower its beamwidth (horizontally). The narrower the beamwidth, the better it is at resolving the target's position. A wider beam makes an arc of a target on the display, from angle it starts seeing the target to the angle it loses the signal from the target. A bigger antenna, with a much narrower beamwidth, cause a smaller target on the display, raising the accuracy of the bearing of the target. The narrower beamwidth also turns one wide target on Radar A into 4 distinct targets from the big antenna on Radar B. B simply resolves the targets as individuals because the beam is narrow enough to stop receiving one target before starting to receive the next as it sweeps by. So, instead of a blob, you get 4 dots showing better positions. It's all about horizontal beamwidth. We want narrow horizontal beamwidth but WIDE vertical beamwidth. If the vertical beamwidth is too narrow, when your boat heels over or pitches and rolls, none of the beam that's so narrow lights up the target, so no signal returns and he doesn't show up on the screen. These tilting mounts sound nice and do, slightly, improve target painting, but the radars' vertical beamwidth is so wide, by design, you'll see the target out the beams heeled over 35 degrees, anyways. The tilting mount centers the RANGE of the allowable vertical tilt it will tolerate. What are the pros and cons of locating a radar on short mast aft, as many cruisers have, or on the main mast of a sloop? That's easy. Climb up to where you think you're going to put the radar while drifting in the harbor. How far can you see? That's how far the radar can see. It sees targets over the horizon that are tall enough to come up above the horizon, like tall TV towers, big buildings, water towers, lighthouses. If you can't see it, the radar can't, either, no matter what its antenna size and power. It's not magic or clairvoyant. There's another problem. As you raise up the antenna higher and higher to see that ship 32 miles away, the vertical beamwidth ends at a higher and higher altitude, farther and farther from the boat CLOSE IN. From the top of the mast, that big bouy you're about to run into disappears from the screen in the fog because the bottom of the radome is a radar shield to keep from cooking the kids' brains on deck. So, the higher the radar is located, the further out from the boat the close in targets disappear because you're shooting the signal right over the top of them. In a sailboat, I don't get too excited seeing a target over 6 miles away unless it's doing over 100 miles per hour. What I get excited about is seeing that damned Bouy in the middle where the two channels intersect in the fog....you know....so I don't run over it and scrape up the gelcoat, looking like a complete fool...(c; I always thought it unfortunate someone doesn't make a sector scanning radar to mount on the bow that can see only 1000 yards in an arc of 120 degrees, straight ahead. It would have a very short pulse length, which is the other limit on how close the radar can see the target from the boat. Radar travels at 300 meters per microsecond. During the time the transmitter is transmitting, the receiver is shorted out to protect its sensitive receiver electronics...on every pulse, we hope. If the transmitter is on for 1 microsecond, any target's echo less than 150 meters away (out, reflect, come back), comes back while the transmitter is on and the receiver is off. So, no target is received. If the pulse width (transmitter on time) is .1 microseconds, the distance is 15 meters and way too late to turn...(c; Modern radars adjust their pulse widths and the number of pulses per second (repetition rate) as you reduce range, because close targets don't need so much RF power so wide to see them with the display set so close. (Your sonar also works this way, but at sound speed in water, lots slower.) The pulse width also determines how much resolution your radar sees on targets close together in line with your signal. If two boats are in line with your sight and 100 meters apart, the wide pulsewidth shows one thick target. Narrow pulsewidths resolve them as two targets because the signal that bounces back shuts down from the close target before the signal from the outer target starts, leaving a gap in signals, and a resulting gap in display blip. In a slow sailboat, compared to something going 30+ knots draining the tanks, I think 25 ft up is a good compromise between range out 6 miles and range close in on that nasty bouy with the gelcoat cutting barnacles....(shudder) Of course, once the proper short transmitter is beaconing all the bouys and obstructions, and the boats are forced to either beacon their AIS data or stay at the dock, all this becomes moot....Watch this: http://www.aisliverpool.org.uk/currentmap.php?map=48 Just move your mouse pointer over any ship in the Irish Sea and look at what AIS is all about. Radar's obsolete...It's time America joined the 21st Century. If you can afford to go to sea, you can afford an AIS transponder, which will get cheaper and cheaper if the market were expanded rapidly. Larry 3rd mate engineering, S/V "Lionheart".... A boat can never have too many electronic gadgets....(c; |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radar Reflectors - Test, links and info | Cruising | |||
Radar performance | Cruising | |||
Questions on Radar | Electronics | |||
Questions on Radar | Cruising | |||
info wanted: how to use radar | Electronics |