![]() |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
My engine panel overspeed alarm is driven by the freq output from the
alternator from the AC taps. The overspeed alarm goes off when the alternator speed is 5000rpm, equiv to engine speed 2300rpm. With a new alternator, I've reduced the pulley size considerably and the alt speed is 5000 rpm at 1400 engine rpm - and the alarm now goes off. The engine panel has a pot to adjust the overspped freq but looking at the service bulletin the freq will be outside its adjsutment range I've got 2 options - the easy one - disconnect the wire - is an overspeed really necessary or useful?? Try and get a device to divide the frequency. Grateful for any ideas. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
CS inscribed in red ink for all to know:
My engine panel overspeed alarm is driven by the freq output from the alternator from the AC taps. The overspeed alarm goes off when the alternator speed is 5000rpm, equiv to engine speed 2300rpm. With a new alternator, I've reduced the pulley size considerably and the alt speed is 5000 rpm at 1400 engine rpm - and the alarm now goes off. The engine panel has a pot to adjust the overspped freq but looking at the service bulletin the freq will be outside its adjsutment range I've got 2 options - the easy one - disconnect the wire - is an overspeed really necessary or useful?? Try and get a device to divide the frequency. Grateful for any ideas. change the alternator pulley back to the one from the old alternator? bob |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Colin,
It would be neat if you gave us any idea what this is about: What engine, What alernator anything else that might interesting. Are you so far from the engine that you could not hear it? Matt Colie CS wrote: My engine panel overspeed alarm is driven by the freq output from the alternator from the AC taps. The overspeed alarm goes off when the alternator speed is 5000rpm, equiv to engine speed 2300rpm. With a new alternator, I've reduced the pulley size considerably and the alt speed is 5000 rpm at 1400 engine rpm - and the alarm now goes off. The engine panel has a pot to adjust the overspped freq but looking at the service bulletin the freq will be outside its adjsutment range I've got 2 options - the easy one - disconnect the wire - is an overspeed really necessary or useful?? Try and get a device to divide the frequency. Grateful for any ideas. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Engine is a Daewoo L136 and the original alternator, 50A 5000 rpm max
continuous, was replaced by a Leece Neville unit, 110A 8000 rpm max cont . To get more amps from the alternator, I reduced the pulley so 8000 alt rpm is now achieved at just over 2300 engine rpm - engien normal max is 2200 rpm. The engine is beneath my feet in a luxemotor barge - so I think the oversped is somewhat superfluous. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
"CS" wrote in news:1160512470.107776.32410
@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: I've got 2 options - the easy one - disconnect the wire - is an overspeed really necessary or useful?? Try and get a device to divide the frequency. As alternator speed has NOTHING to do with its output once it's just off idle, why not put the right pulley back on it, correcting the problem and saving the alternator bearings from overspeed, themselves...premature failure. Spinning an alternator so fast DOESN'T make it put out another amp.... No, you can't charge the house batteries in 5 minutes, either....(sigh) -- There's amazing intelligence in the Universe. You can tell because none of them ever called Earth. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
As alternator speed has NOTHING to do with its output once it's just off
idle, why not put the right pulley back on it, correcting the problem and saving the alternator bearings from overspeed, themselves...premature failure. Spinning an alternator so fast DOESN'T make it put out another amp.... COMPLETELY INCORRECT - look at the output curve for the alternator here - http://www.prestolite.com/images_alt...161U_curve.pdf At engine idle, alt will be at 2500 and deliver 85A. With old pulley off original alt, alt is only at 1500rpm and output is only 35A - so quite a useful increase. Output therefore CLEARLY varies considerably with speed and the spec sheet I got from Prestolite has it continuously rated for 8000 rpm - so it is not being overspeeded. Fundamental AC - the higher the freq (= more rpm) the greater the power that can be transmitted. Which is why aircraft AC systems are often at 400Hz - smaller kit but higher power. No, you can't charge the house batteries in 5 minutes, either....(sigh) At 110A a 920Ah battery is going to charge a hell of a lot quicker than at 50A. I'll leave you to do the sums. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Higher AC frequencies are good for transformers, but don't have an effect on the
transmission of power reasonable distances and a boat is way smaller than that. But since your AC is being converted to DC, the transformer argument is irrelevant. And your AC frequency will be pretty high start with -- there's more than one cycle per rev. "CS" wrote in message ups.com... As alternator speed has NOTHING to do with its output once it's just off idle, why not put the right pulley back on it, correcting the problem and saving the alternator bearings from overspeed, themselves...premature failure. Spinning an alternator so fast DOESN'T make it put out another amp.... COMPLETELY INCORRECT - look at the output curve for the alternator here - http://www.prestolite.com/images_alt...161U_curve.pdf At engine idle, alt will be at 2500 and deliver 85A. With old pulley off original alt, alt is only at 1500rpm and output is only 35A - so quite a useful increase. Output therefore CLEARLY varies considerably with speed and the spec sheet I got from Prestolite has it continuously rated for 8000 rpm - so it is not being overspeeded. Fundamental AC - the higher the freq (= more rpm) the greater the power that can be transmitted. Which is why aircraft AC systems are often at 400Hz - smaller kit but higher power. No, you can't charge the house batteries in 5 minutes, either....(sigh) At 110A a 920Ah battery is going to charge a hell of a lot quicker than at 50A. I'll leave you to do the sums. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
"CS" wrote in news:1160536091.872456.50110
@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com: At 110A a 920Ah battery is going to charge a hell of a lot quicker than at 50A. I'll leave you to do the sums. Hmm.....is the regulator shorted?.... Over and over boaters report on here how quickly their huge battery banks drop off full current to 20A or 30A, tapering quickly to their consternation as the regulators do their jobs, much to their dismay.... LEAD ACID BATTERIES CHARGE VERY SLOWLY....hours and hours. You CANNOT charge a 920AH battery from 50% to full charge in the 5 minutes they all want to run the engine charging batteries................yet. However, the solution IS on the radar: http://www.toshiba.co.jp/about/press/2005_03/pr2901.htm 80% in 60 seconds.... 100% in 3 minutes flat.... 99% charge recovery after 1000 deep, deep cycles! Hmmm...the sums....950 AH new Li-Ion nanobeast charge in 60 seconds to 80% = 760AH....that would be 760A if we charged it in an hour but we're gonna charge it 60 times faster than that so 760A x 60 = 45,600A X 14.2V = 647,520 watts for 60 seconds divided by 746w/HP = 867HP for a minute....Hmm....don't think the Yanmar 3GM is gonna like that....How many v-belts does it take to drive a 45,600A alternator, anyways?? Can we mount the 700KW alternator where the aft cabin used to be? Maybe it'll charge it on your 110A charger running wide open for 950 divided by 110 = 8.6 hours....does that sound better? The new battery won't even get warm at 110 amps...It's internal resistance must be in nano-ohms to take a huge charging current like they do. Thankfully, the 1920's technology lead-acid wetcell's days are numbered.... Still no news I've found when the Nano-Li-Ions will be marketed. I suspect the auto and oil industries are heavily pressuring Toshiba and the other developers to flush the damned inventor and his notes down the toilet like they did all the EV cars (EV-1/GM remember them? All EV-1s were confiscated and crushed after dealers bitched they wouldn't need constant, expensive maintenance and repairs, the dealer's gravy train.) With THIS battery, the EV-1 would refuel in less time than it took to refill the Ford Exploder at god-awful amps/volts and every time you pressed the "brake" pedal, the huge power generated would restore the charge on the new Li-Ion cells under the trunk, instantly, not wasted trying to charge slowcharge batteries like now. Man, what an electric car we'd have if the *******s in control don't bury it, again! A side note: I've seen the webpage of the Dell notebook with the defective Li-Ion battery exploding on some conference table in a hotel. Very violent and very hot! It was about 4AH...Wonder what the fire will look like on a 950A Li-Ion house battery?? Will there be any boat left? There wasn't much notebook left...or table it was sitting on! -- There's amazing intelligence in the Universe. You can tell because none of them ever called Earth. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Higher AC frequencies are good for transformers, but don't have an effect on the transmission of power reasonable distances and a boat is way smaller than that. But since your AC is being converted to DC, the transformer argument is irrelevant. I'm lost - I have not mentioned transformers??? And your AC frequency will be pretty high start with -- there's more than one cycle per rev. Yes, a 10 pole alt at 8000 rpm is generating AC at around 1332Hz. More A can be produced at 1332Hz than at 50Hz. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
"Larry" wrote
As alternator speed has NOTHING to do with its output once it's just off idle, why not put the right pulley back on it, correcting the problem and saving the alternator bearings from overspeed, themselves...premature failure. Spinning an alternator so fast DOESN'T make it put out another amp.... Look at any alternator output curve and you will see that amps increase as RPM increases up to the point where they approach full output and then level out. That point is usually between 2500 and 3500 shaft RPM. There are a very few very expensive alternators, like the Eco-Tech, that are built to produce close to full output at less than 2000 RPM that have a very steep curve but most alternators require a minimum 2500 RPM to reach any significant output. That said, the OP's choice of alternators may not be the best if he wants to charge at dead idle. The output curve has a particularly slow slope. He should also consider that it takes a certain amount of power to produce 85 amps. Besides the output, the other item on that chart he should consider is the Torque curve. When you use a pulley ratio that allows close to full output at 800 engine RPM the torque increases to the point that invites belt failure and excessive side loads on bearings. His best option is to reduce the ratio closer to the original and charge at 1200 to 1500 engine RPM. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Look at any alternator output curve and you will see that amps increase as RPM increases up to the point where they approach full output and then level out. That point is usually between 2500 and 3500 shaft RPM. There are a very few very expensive alternators, like the Eco-Tech, that are built to produce close to full output at less than 2000 RPM that have a very steep curve but most alternators require a minimum 2500 RPM to reach any significant output. Look at the LN curve I've posted - it is not as stated above. Full output is at 5000 alt rpm and it then levels out. That said, the OP's choice of alternators may not be the best if he wants to charge at dead idle. The output curve has a particularly slow slope. He should also consider that it takes a certain amount of power to produce 85 amps. Besides the output, the other item on that chart he should consider is the Torque curve. When you use a pulley ratio that allows close to full output at 800 engine RPM the torque increases to the point that invites belt failure and excessive side loads on bearings. My engine can deliver up to 20kW at engine idle according to the makers engine manual - more than enough for the 2 - 3 kW taken by the alternator. Torque will also not be an issue with dual belts. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Look at the LN curve I've posted - it is not as stated above. Full output is at 5000 alt rpm and it then levels out. That is what I meant about "OP's choice of alternators may not be the best ". That particular alternator has a relatively slow slope up to full power. My engine can deliver up to 20kW at engine idle according to the makers engine manual - more than enough for the 2 - 3 kW taken by the alternator. Torque will also not be an issue with dual belts. Off which end? My Yanmar can handle a lot of torque off the back end but the front crankshaft bearings are not designed to handle a lot of side load. Double belts will stop the slippage but a double pulley extends the center of load further from the bearing increasing the leverage of the side load. There is also the principle that diesel engines are much happier running at 1800 RPM than they are at 800. For many reasons running at idle under light loads for long periods is hard on diesels. I am not saying don't do it. Just that there are better ways to tackle the problem. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Fundamental AC - the higher the freq (= more rpm) the greater the power
that can be transmitted. Which is why aircraft AC systems are often at 400Hz - smaller kit but higher power. I was explaining why aircraft sometimes use 400Hz AC -- because they can carry smaller transformers. I won't disagree that you can generate (not transmit) more power by spinning the alternator faster (up to a limit). "CS" wrote in message ups.com... Higher AC frequencies are good for transformers, but don't have an effect on the transmission of power reasonable distances and a boat is way smaller than that. But since your AC is being converted to DC, the transformer argument is irrelevant. I'm lost - I have not mentioned transformers??? And your AC frequency will be pretty high start with -- there's more than one cycle per rev. Yes, a 10 pole alt at 8000 rpm is generating AC at around 1332Hz. More A can be produced at 1332Hz than at 50Hz. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Glenn Ashmore wrote: Look at the LN curve I've posted - it is not as stated above. Full output is at 5000 alt rpm and it then levels out. That is what I meant about "OP's choice of alternators may not be the best ". That particular alternator has a relatively slow slope up to full power. My engine can deliver up to 20kW at engine idle according to the makers engine manual - more than enough for the 2 - 3 kW taken by the alternator. Torque will also not be an issue with dual belts. Off which end? My Yanmar can handle a lot of torque off the back end but the front crankshaft bearings are not designed to handle a lot of side load. Double belts will stop the slippage but a double pulley extends the center of load further from the bearing increasing the leverage of the side load. Off the front crankshaft and or a PTO shaft. The engine is an 8 litre 6 cyl natural aspirated 160 Hp engine which weights 1000kg and is a proper industrial marine engine as used by fishing vessels - not a bleeding micky mouse Yanmar engine designed for pleasure yachts. I have done a certain amount of research and I am amazed by the complete rubbish being spouted about alternators. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Colin,
Don't sweat the overspeed. Unfortunately, this engine is too new for my catalogues, but I and quite sure that it is using a Hitachi copy of a Bosch TE injection pump. This pump includes a controlling governor that not only controls the engine to produce the ordered crankshaft speed but also limits the speed to a safe maximum. The only way to exceed that speed is by introducing additional fuel (often that is injested lube oil) and it that occurs there is often little the operator can do without getting too close to the engine. I was glad to see that you are running double belts because that is just about and maybe a little bit over the capability of a single belt. Matt Colie Lifelong Waterman, Licensed Mariner (Diesel Chief...) CS wrote: Engine is a Daewoo L136 and the original alternator, 50A 5000 rpm max continuous, was replaced by a Leece Neville unit, 110A 8000 rpm max cont . To get more amps from the alternator, I reduced the pulley so 8000 alt rpm is now achieved at just over 2300 engine rpm - engien normal max is 2200 rpm. The engine is beneath my feet in a luxemotor barge - so I think the oversped is somewhat superfluous. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Colin,
I'm really confused. If you already know so much about alternators, why ask your question to the group in the first place? Glenn has expressed very valid concerns when equiping an engine with an alternator. It appears that you have out engineered yourself. If you need to spin your alternator 8k rpm to get it to perform, you have clearly chosen the wrong alternator. Go out and buy a proper large magnet Leese-Neville industrial grade alternator and spin the thing acording to OEM instructions. Problem solved. Steve "CS" wrote in message ups.com... Glenn Ashmore wrote: Look at the LN curve I've posted - it is not as stated above. Full output is at 5000 alt rpm and it then levels out. That is what I meant about "OP's choice of alternators may not be the best ". That particular alternator has a relatively slow slope up to full power. My engine can deliver up to 20kW at engine idle according to the makers engine manual - more than enough for the 2 - 3 kW taken by the alternator. Torque will also not be an issue with dual belts. Off which end? My Yanmar can handle a lot of torque off the back end but the front crankshaft bearings are not designed to handle a lot of side load. Double belts will stop the slippage but a double pulley extends the center of load further from the bearing increasing the leverage of the side load. Off the front crankshaft and or a PTO shaft. The engine is an 8 litre 6 cyl natural aspirated 160 Hp engine which weights 1000kg and is a proper industrial marine engine as used by fishing vessels - not a bleeding micky mouse Yanmar engine designed for pleasure yachts. I have done a certain amount of research and I am amazed by the complete rubbish being spouted about alternators. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:52:24 +0200, "Steve Lusardi"
wrote: Colin, I'm really confused. If you already know so much about alternators, why ask your question to the group in the first place? Glenn has expressed very valid concerns when equiping an engine with an alternator. It appears that you have out engineered yourself. If you need to spin your alternator 8k rpm to get it to perform, you have clearly chosen the wrong alternator. Go out and buy a proper large magnet Leese-Neville industrial grade alternator and spin the thing acording to OEM instructions. Problem solved. Steve Colin did not originally ask about specifying an alternator,he was discussing engine overspeed alarm requirements. The alternator he indicated is a Leece-Neville! I cannot see the problem with his setup! Richard Nb "Pound Eater" Parkend G+S |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Richard,
Colin's overspeed problem started when he changed the speed of the alternator. He needs to use an alternator that generates the required power at the original alternator speed. He may have a Leece-Neville alternator, but it is not the large magnet variety, if he has to spin it at 8K rpm. Steve "Electricky Dicky" wrote in message ... On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:52:24 +0200, "Steve Lusardi" wrote: Colin, I'm really confused. If you already know so much about alternators, why ask your question to the group in the first place? Glenn has expressed very valid concerns when equiping an engine with an alternator. It appears that you have out engineered yourself. If you need to spin your alternator 8k rpm to get it to perform, you have clearly chosen the wrong alternator. Go out and buy a proper large magnet Leese-Neville industrial grade alternator and spin the thing acording to OEM instructions. Problem solved. Steve Colin did not originally ask about specifying an alternator,he was discussing engine overspeed alarm requirements. The alternator he indicated is a Leece-Neville! I cannot see the problem with his setup! Richard Nb "Pound Eater" Parkend G+S |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
Steve Lusardi wrote: Richard, Colin's overspeed problem started when he changed the speed of the alternator. He needs to use an alternator that generates the required power at the original alternator speed. He may have a Leece-Neville alternator, but it is not the large magnet variety, if he has to spin it at 8K rpm. Steve OK - I've just looked at the military alternators and indeed some do generate full power at a lowly 2500/3000 rpm. But they are pretty vast bits of kit and will not readily mount on my engine. The work involved to fit would immense. A small pulley for £10 and disconnect a wire is a simple cost effective option. BTW my 240v AC alternator on the same engine spins up to 14000 rpm quite happily. |
Overspeed alarm based on alternator frequency
CS,
They are not just Military, they are industrial as well. They can be found on all big trucks, gererators, water pumps and other stationary diesel applications. I assume you are in England. If so go to www.valkenpower.com Call or send an email to Jack. They are in Holland and the prices are good. Tell him Steve sent you. Steve "CS" wrote in message ups.com... Steve Lusardi wrote: Richard, Colin's overspeed problem started when he changed the speed of the alternator. He needs to use an alternator that generates the required power at the original alternator speed. He may have a Leece-Neville alternator, but it is not the large magnet variety, if he has to spin it at 8K rpm. Steve OK - I've just looked at the military alternators and indeed some do generate full power at a lowly 2500/3000 rpm. But they are pretty vast bits of kit and will not readily mount on my engine. The work involved to fit would immense. A small pulley for £10 and disconnect a wire is a simple cost effective option. BTW my 240v AC alternator on the same engine spins up to 14000 rpm quite happily. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com