Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.electronics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry makes some good points, although they are couched a little too
heavily in absolutes. I don't agree that the losses with a two-foot separation would necessarily be unacceptable. Leaving aside whether the near-field losses will arise from electric (displacement currents as Larry suggests) or magnetic fields, almost all metal structures above the deck will alter the near-field properties of a deck-mounted antenna. Regarding the sufficiency of a two-foot separation, I would point out that most HF mobile antennas are mounted well within two feet of the vehicle's vertical metal components for something like two feet of vertical rise. There is ample evidence that these installations "work", or if they do not, it is usually not because of proximity to the vehicle's vertical surfaces. HF antennas on aircraft have been run entirely along the metal fuselage with separations on the order of two feet. These "work" also. So before rejecting the customary deck-mounting of a 23-foot whip with a horizontal support, it would be useful to provide the OP with some concrete indication of how well the antenna is likely to perform compared to the next best alternative. While I can't do that quantitatively, (I did suggest an experiment, which a competent tech could do fairly quickly) it is my experience that such an installation could be satisfactory. With only the top 16 feet as a radiator, near-field losses become negligible but tuner losses predominate. At higher frequencies (above 8 MHz, for example) 16 feet in the clear will probably outperform 23 feet mounted next to the pilothouse. At lower frequencies it is more difficult to say which would be better. Lacking further information from the OP, that is probably the best we can offer. The antenna, tuner, and SSB manufacturers should be contacted to mine their experience. For the strong of heart, center- and/or top-loading could even be employed in some circumstances to shape the current distribution on the whip in such a way as to reduce losses near the pilothouse. Out of curiosity, did the boat's designer/naval architect not address this design detail? Surely it is not an out-of-the-ordinary design question. Chuck Larry wrote: bradleyj wrote in : I understand that it is important to keep the whip from coming too close to any metal. This is an obvious problem, since this boat is all aluminum. Any suggestions or references would be appreciated. You're very lucky, as HF operators go. The metal boat will make an excellent "ground plane", the counterpoise plastic boat owners dream of. What kills HF is any PARALLEL metal which the RF waves intercept on their way out of the boat. This actually creates a capacitor, its two plates being the mast at boat ground and the whip, with the air as its insulator, thus shunting the RF energy off to ground. Two feet is not enough, infinity is. The further you can get the whip away from any metal rising over it, the better. The best place is atop the mast with the whip sticking way up above it, but this isn't very practical as you'll be going under overhead obstructions. So, let's mount the whip as far away from the mast as we can get, including its guy wires and other metal/wire/conductive things going aloft. Let's put the base for the whip on TOP of the nice metal pilot house ground plane (which ends up perpendicular to the whip). This makes USE of the excellent ground plane effect of the horizontal pilot house roof, while keeping the E-field from intersecting it. PLEASE DO NOT MOUNT THE WHIP ON THE SIDE OF ANY METAL HOUSE if you can at all help it. The shunt capacitance of the whip near the wall of the pilot house exterior mounted for convenience on the side somewhere is just awful...sucking your signal off to that metal along side the whip. Signals suck like that. You didn't mention a flybridge atop the pilot house so I'll assume you don't have one. So, let's mount the whip dead centerline of the pilot house roof, about a foot from the forward edge of it, with the weatherproof tuner right next to it. The tuner's output wire to the whip should be as short as you can possibly make it as that becomes part of the antenna (and part of the shunt signal off to metal problem). The ideal mount would be a hole in the pilot house roof with an insulator mounted THROUGH the roof with the tuner mounted safely INSIDE the pilot house right next to where the feed-thru mount's "hot" bolt protrudes inside. Of course, though I'd be proud as hell of it, myself, the yachties would scowl, seeing the tuner overhead of the pilothouse...(c; Be sure, wherever you mount the whip/tuner to put a heavy metal stainless strap from the tuner's ground bolt to the BARE METAL under the closest leg of the tuner where it's bolted to the pilot house roof, a fantastic ground. I'm green with envy. Lionheart has a long strap ground to the engine block...the only metal mass of any consequence in the plastic ketch.... (sigh). Larry W4CSC Lionheart WDB-6254 Icom M802, Icom AT-130, 55' long insulated backstay....poorly grounded...dammit. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Keep VHF Radio Antenna At Least 1 Meter Away From Our Heads? | General | |||
Which Type of VHF Radio Antenna Is Suitable for a 18-Ft Fiberglass Center Console? | General | |||
Sail Magazine article on ham antenna? | Electronics | |||
Internal GPS Antenna (IGPS) Question | General | |||
Projects-anchor-windlass Installation + Other links | Cruising |