Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
RB
 
Posts: n/a
Default LORAN ant question

Does the length of a LORAN metal whip matter much? I recall a time when I
found I didn't even have an antenna on my LORAN (years ago); just a coil of
coax under the console, and it worked fine. So, can I stick just about any
whip on the coupler and get good results? Or, is there some reasonant
length that is needed?

I'm putting a LORAN in my 18' cc, and want to use a short metal whip on the
coupler, if that'll work OK.


  #2   Report Post  
Del Cecchi
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"RB" wrote in message
.. .
Does the length of a LORAN metal whip matter much? I recall a time when I
found I didn't even have an antenna on my LORAN (years ago); just a coil
of
coax under the console, and it worked fine. So, can I stick just about
any
whip on the coupler and get good results? Or, is there some reasonant
length that is needed?

I'm putting a LORAN in my 18' cc, and want to use a short metal whip on
the
coupler, if that'll work OK.

Why on earth would you want LORAN? Is it even active anymore?


  #3   Report Post  
RB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I knew that was going to come up (grin)!

Well, I have several old LORANs laying around, and am not interested in
forking over for a new GPS right now. And yes, LORAN is still doing fine in
the Gulf. LORAN will do fine for my close inshore purposes. I used it for
years.


  #4   Report Post  
Larry W4CSC
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"RB" wrote in
:

Does the length of a LORAN metal whip matter much?


Yes, it matters a lot. Loran operates at 100 Khz, Very Low Frequency. The
antennas are heavily coil loaded to tune them at this low a frequency and
very narrow banded. The whip length is part of this tuning and if you
change it to a different length the antenna is way out of tune and not near
as sensitive. It may still function out of tune, but signals will be down.

  #5   Report Post  
RB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

}}} The
antennas are heavily coil loaded {{{

Not sure about this in my situation here. Both my units (one is Morrow, the
other Sitex) have base coupler units. These couplers have a circuit board
inside them, and seem to have dc powering that circuit board through the
coax to the coupler. Haven't seen any coil.




  #6   Report Post  
Dennis Pogson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry W4CSC wrote:
"RB" wrote in
:

Does the length of a LORAN metal whip matter much?


Yes, it matters a lot. Loran operates at 100 Khz, Very Low
Frequency. The antennas are heavily coil loaded to tune them at this
low a frequency and very narrow banded. The whip length is part of
this tuning and if you change it to a different length the antenna is
way out of tune and not near as sensitive. It may still function out
of tune, but signals will be down.


That's about the same frequency as my sextant works on.


  #7   Report Post  
chuck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Morrow is one of the companies that use "active" antennas to
overcome the fatal signal losses resulting from enormously
high impedance (~ 1 Megohm, albeit mostly reactive) of
extremely short antennas fed into 50-ohm receiver inputs.

Your circuit board probably contains an FET follower to
convert the high impedance of the antenna to a low impedance
of 50 ohms. To do this with a coil would probably render the
system so lossy as to not work at all.

You should be able to vary the antenna length modest amounts
(I'm thinking +/- 20%)with no noticeable difference. Just
how far you can go will be a question you can answer easily
by trying different lengths of substitute antenna.

On the other hand, if it was working fine with no antenna at
all, (was the coax connected to the circuit board?) do you
really need to go to this trouble?

Good luck, and let us know how you make out!

Chuck

RB wrote:
Does the length of a LORAN metal whip matter much? I recall a time when I
found I didn't even have an antenna on my LORAN (years ago); just a coil of
coax under the console, and it worked fine. So, can I stick just about any
whip on the coupler and get good results? Or, is there some reasonant
length that is needed?

I'm putting a LORAN in my 18' cc, and want to use a short metal whip on the
coupler, if that'll work OK.


  #8   Report Post  
Graham Stephen
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Del Cecchi" wrote in message
...

"RB" wrote in message
.. .
Does the length of a LORAN metal whip matter much? I recall a time when
I
found I didn't even have an antenna on my LORAN (years ago); just a coil
of
coax under the console, and it worked fine. So, can I stick just about
any
whip on the coupler and get good results? Or, is there some reasonant
length that is needed?

I'm putting a LORAN in my 18' cc, and want to use a short metal whip on
the
coupler, if that'll work OK.

Why on earth would you want LORAN? Is it even active anymore?


LORAN is alive, well, developing and expanding. Probably for the same
reasons that GLONASS exists and GALILEO is being planned. Not everyone is
enthusiastic about relying on a single US controlled system.

See http://www.loran.org/

I don't have a LORAN set, but it is somewhere on my wish list.

Graham


  #9   Report Post  
RB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Talked to Sitex and they said anything 4' or over would do. There are now
several 4' fiberglass antennas marketed for LORAN, so just ordered one of
those. I just didn't want a long whip on top of the bimini, if I could get
by with a shorter antenna.


  #10   Report Post  
Bob Medico
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi,

Your post interested me because I need a coupler for a SITEX unit. I am
not an electronics expert but have successfully fabricated circuits from
schematics in the past. The long and short of is that I would like to
attempt to build my own coupler. Do you or anyone else here have access
to SITEX service manuals that may show the circuit used. I would think
that such low frequency stuff would not be too touchy to fabricate if
one had the schematic and parts list. I have a SITEX LORAN 797.

TIA

Bob

chuck wrote:

Morrow is one of the companies that use "active" antennas to
overcome the fatal signal losses resulting from enormously
high impedance (~ 1 Megohm, albeit mostly reactive) of
extremely short antennas fed into 50-ohm receiver inputs.

Your circuit board probably contains an FET follower to
convert the high impedance of the antenna to a low impedance
of 50 ohms. To do this with a coil would probably render the
system so lossy as to not work at all.

You should be able to vary the antenna length modest amounts
(I'm thinking +/- 20%)with no noticeable difference. Just
how far you can go will be a question you can answer easily
by trying different lengths of substitute antenna.

On the other hand, if it was working fine with no antenna at
all, (was the coax connected to the circuit board?) do you
really need to go to this trouble?

Good luck, and let us know how you make out!

Chuck

RB wrote:
Does the length of a LORAN metal whip matter much? I recall a time when I
found I didn't even have an antenna on my LORAN (years ago); just a coil of
coax under the console, and it worked fine. So, can I stick just about any
whip on the coupler and get good results? Or, is there some reasonant
length that is needed?

I'm putting a LORAN in my 18' cc, and want to use a short metal whip on the
coupler, if that'll work OK.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another strip-plank question - a bit long Pete Boat Building 3 January 12th 04 08:03 PM
Propeller efficiency question (electric) MBS Boat Building 4 December 23rd 03 04:39 AM
Exhaust question on inboard 1958 Chris Craft Gary Warner Boat Building 5 September 25th 03 12:32 AM
Sunday's VHF antics.....and a question.. Electronics 8 September 13th 03 09:04 AM
Question about Loran antenna coupler for Vector II (Pilot II) Jon B Electronics 3 September 1st 03 04:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017