Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Eric,
Thanks for clarifying. I believe you are correct. You are talking about high-resistance onboard leakages that generate currents too small to be detected by the GFI circuit or the breakers. The isolator diodes would probably not conduct under those circumstances and a capacitor would help. UL requires the GFI to trip at a 5 ma unbalance, so 24,000 ohms of leakage would trip it. Actually, the isolator diodes would probably pass 5 ma in that circuit without a capacitor. The capacitor would be necessary when the leakage resistance was in the megohms and the currents in the microamps. Would rather not have that stuff flowing through my ground connections through the water to adjacent boats, even at those low current levels. This underscores the importance of making sure you don't have dangerous leakages onboard in the first place. Easy enough to check, but how many regularly test their GFIs? We sure agree on the isolation transformer, too. Thanks again, Eric. Chuck |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Galvanic Isolator | Electronics | |||
Galvanic corrosion and Radio | Electronics | |||
Seamanship Question #17 Galvanic Corrosion | ASA | |||
Galvanic Isolators/All the same? | Boat Building | |||
galvanic corrosion | Electronics |