Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() chuck wrote: So are there any benefits to not having a capacitor? Maybe. There is no such thing as a galvanic AC current, I guess, but there can be an AC electrolytic current. Research suggests these currents may be even more damaging than DC currents. So from a corrosion perspective, it would be good to block them from getting into the boat's green wire. An isolator without a capacitor would at least block the lower-voltage AC, but would allow the higher-voltage AC to pass (once the 1.5 volt threshold was exceeded). So where is the benefit to adding the capacitor? None that I can see. The only ways to fully provide for onboard safety and also eliminate galvanic and electrolytic currents from traveling through the green wire are to use an isolation transformer, or don't bring shore power aboard. Usually, a simple galvanic isolator is sufficient. Regards, Chuck The AC currents are currents are all ready in your green wire from leaky equipment in your boat. These currents are making a complete circuit to where the grounding wire is connected to neutral on shore. The question is whether or not this happens through the grounding wire via the capacitor in the isolator or through a metal fixture on your boat, through the water, to ground, grounding rod, and then to neautral. The down side is if you have a capacitor and your neigbor doesn't than her AC currents might use your underwater parts and capacitor in your isolator as the shortest path to the neutral/ground connection point on shore. This is why ALL isolators should have a capacitor and I think ABYC may require one. If they don't they should. Or you could just spend the money and valuable space for an isolation transformer and not worry about it. Hope my point is better made than in the previous posting. Eric |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Eric,
Thanks for clarifying. I believe you are correct. You are talking about high-resistance onboard leakages that generate currents too small to be detected by the GFI circuit or the breakers. The isolator diodes would probably not conduct under those circumstances and a capacitor would help. UL requires the GFI to trip at a 5 ma unbalance, so 24,000 ohms of leakage would trip it. Actually, the isolator diodes would probably pass 5 ma in that circuit without a capacitor. The capacitor would be necessary when the leakage resistance was in the megohms and the currents in the microamps. Would rather not have that stuff flowing through my ground connections through the water to adjacent boats, even at those low current levels. This underscores the importance of making sure you don't have dangerous leakages onboard in the first place. Easy enough to check, but how many regularly test their GFIs? We sure agree on the isolation transformer, too. Thanks again, Eric. Chuck |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-02-25 12:44:20 +1100, chuck said:
Hello Eric, Thanks for clarifying. I believe you are correct. You are talking about high-resistance onboard leakages that generate currents too small to be detected by the GFI circuit or the breakers. The isolator diodes would probably not conduct under those circumstances and a capacitor would help. UL requires the GFI to trip at a 5 ma unbalance, so 24,000 ohms of leakage would trip it. Actually, the isolator diodes would probably pass 5 ma in that circuit without a capacitor. The capacitor would be necessary when the leakage resistance was in the megohms and the currents in the microamps. Would rather not have that stuff flowing through my ground connections through the water to adjacent boats, even at those low current levels. This underscores the importance of making sure you don't have dangerous leakages onboard in the first place. Easy enough to check, but how many regularly test their GFIs? We sure agree on the isolation transformer, too. Thanks again, Eric. Chuck Chuck, I am puzzled by your UL 5 ma rating. Here in Australia we have basically two ratings. The first is for most domestic installations an is 30 ma. The second is for hazerdous locations including hospitals where the rating is 10 ma. There are other higher rating RCD (Residual Current Devices) which are used in industrial contexts (eg 60 ma) but the majority of installations are either 30 ma. or 10 ma. BTW I am an EE as well as a licensed Electrical Contractor. -- Regards, John Proctor VK3JP, VKV6789 S/V Chagall |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello John,
Thanks for the info. My first reaction is to suggest that we use 5 ma because we Yanks are a less hardy lot and need that extra protection. But if you look at the link: http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/JackHsu.shtml Electric Current Needed to Kill a Human you'll see that 60 - 70 ma. may be a lethal dose. My guess is that the 5 ma was chosen to be below the general human threshold of sensation. But I have no idea why Australia has chosen so high a threshold. And did I read somewhere that in Europe the residential distribution lines are nowhere grounded? A two-wire system, I seem to recall. You don't have that kind of system in Australia, do you John? Regards, Chuck John Proctor wrote: On 2005-02-25 12:44:20 +1100, chuck said: Hello Eric, Thanks for clarifying. I believe you are correct. You are talking about high-resistance onboard leakages that generate currents too small to be detected by the GFI circuit or the breakers. The isolator diodes would probably not conduct under those circumstances and a capacitor would help. UL requires the GFI to trip at a 5 ma unbalance, so 24,000 ohms of leakage would trip it. Actually, the isolator diodes would probably pass 5 ma in that circuit without a capacitor. The capacitor would be necessary when the leakage resistance was in the megohms and the currents in the microamps. Would rather not have that stuff flowing through my ground connections through the water to adjacent boats, even at those low current levels. This underscores the importance of making sure you don't have dangerous leakages onboard in the first place. Easy enough to check, but how many regularly test their GFIs? We sure agree on the isolation transformer, too. Thanks again, Eric. Chuck Chuck, I am puzzled by your UL 5 ma rating. Here in Australia we have basically two ratings. The first is for most domestic installations an is 30 ma. The second is for hazerdous locations including hospitals where the rating is 10 ma. There are other higher rating RCD (Residual Current Devices) which are used in industrial contexts (eg 60 ma) but the majority of installations are either 30 ma. or 10 ma. BTW I am an EE as well as a licensed Electrical Contractor. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Galvanic Isolator | Electronics | |||
Galvanic corrosion and Radio | Electronics | |||
Seamanship Question #17 Galvanic Corrosion | ASA | |||
Galvanic Isolators/All the same? | Boat Building | |||
galvanic corrosion | Electronics |