Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello there halibutslayer,
I think there is a little misunderstanding about what a galvanic isolator does. If constructed the usual way with four diodes, the isolator will conduct AC AND DC, except that until the voltage exceeds about 1.5 volts, it doesn't conduct at all (simplification of course). Depending on the design rating of the diodes and heat sink, it may conduct 30 or 50 or 200 amps AC, DC, or both, forever! Now this is an isolator without any capacitors. Add a capacitor and what happens? It will still conduct 30 or 50 or 200 amps AC, DC, or both, forever. What changes? It will now conduct AC without the 1.5 volt threshold kicking in. But depending on the capacitor chosen, the AC voltage drop could be even more than 1.5 volts. Could be less. Who knows? What does it matter? AC voltage can and does vary by a lot more than a few volts without jeopardizing the safety of the vessel. So there simply does not seem to be a safety issue associated with making sure there is not a 1.5 volt AC threshold, while allowing some other unspecified AC voltage drop. No difference will be seen in the way fuses and breakers and GFIs work, with or without a capacitor. So are there any benefits to not having a capacitor? Maybe. There is no such thing as a galvanic AC current, I guess, but there can be an AC electrolytic current. Research suggests these currents may be even more damaging than DC currents. So from a corrosion perspective, it would be good to block them from getting into the boat's green wire. An isolator without a capacitor would at least block the lower-voltage AC, but would allow the higher-voltage AC to pass (once the 1.5 volt threshold was exceeded). So where is the benefit to adding the capacitor? None that I can see. The only ways to fully provide for onboard safety and also eliminate galvanic and electrolytic currents from traveling through the green wire are to use an isolation transformer, or don't bring shore power aboard. Usually, a simple galvanic isolator is sufficient. Regards, Chuck |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Galvanic Isolator | Electronics | |||
Galvanic corrosion and Radio | Electronics | |||
Seamanship Question #17 Galvanic Corrosion | ASA | |||
Galvanic Isolators/All the same? | Boat Building | |||
galvanic corrosion | Electronics |