Terry Spragg wrote in
:

Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant
reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night
with a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad,
noisy antenna.


Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet stuck
to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One of these
days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so good stuck to
the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with something that always
works. It's even sideways from the way it's supposed to be stuck.....go
figure??

XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials
spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA
commercial FM from Clear Channel.

Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal
waters. No Coverage in the BVI and south.
krj

Larry W4CSC wrote:
Terry Spragg wrote in
:


Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant
reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night
with a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad,
noisy antenna.



Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet stuck
to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One of these
days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so good stuck to
the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with something that always
works. It's even sideways from the way it's supposed to be stuck.....go
figure??

XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials
spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA
commercial FM from Clear Channel.

I thought Sirius and XM worked off of geosynchronous sats over the equator.

"krj" wrote in message
...
Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal waters.
No Coverage in the BVI and south.
krj

Larry W4CSC wrote:
Terry Spragg wrote in
:


Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant
reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night with
a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad, noisy antenna.



Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet
stuck to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One
of these days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so
good stuck to the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with something
that always works. It's even sideways from the way it's supposed to be
stuck.....go figure??

XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials
spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA
commercial FM from Clear Channel.

There are two satellites in geosynchronous orbit, XM-1 (named Roll) at
85 degrees and XM-2 (names Rock) at 115 degrees. Both are 24 transponder
C band satellites with antennas that are positioned to have a footprint
for the CONUS. The footprints extend slightly into Canada and Mexico and
about 100 miles offshore.
krj

Doug Dotson wrote:
I thought Sirius and XM worked off of geosynchronous sats over the equator.

"krj" wrote in message
...

Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal waters.
No Coverage in the BVI and south.
krj

Larry W4CSC wrote:

Terry Spragg wrote in
:



Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant
reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night with
a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad, noisy antenna.



Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet
stuck to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One
of these days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so
good stuck to the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with something
that always works. It's even sideways from the way it's supposed to be
stuck.....go figure??

XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials
spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA
commercial FM from Clear Channel.

OK. Thanks for the info.

"krj" wrote in message
...
There are two satellites in geosynchronous orbit, XM-1 (named Roll) at 85
degrees and XM-2 (names Rock) at 115 degrees. Both are 24 transponder C
band satellites with antennas that are positioned to have a footprint for
the CONUS. The footprints extend slightly into Canada and Mexico and about
100 miles offshore.
krj

Doug Dotson wrote:
I thought Sirius and XM worked off of geosynchronous sats over the
equator.

"krj" wrote in message
...

Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal
waters. No Coverage in the BVI and south.
krj

Larry W4CSC wrote:

Terry Spragg wrote in
:



Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant
reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night
with a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad, noisy
antenna.



Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet
stuck to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One
of these days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so
good stuck to the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with
something that always works. It's even sideways from the way it's
supposed to be stuck.....go figure??

XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials
spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA
commercial FM from Clear Channel.

So the antennas on the bird are directional targeted at the US? Otherwise
I would think that an equal area below the equator would be covered.

Doug

"krj" wrote in message
...
There are two satellites in geosynchronous orbit, XM-1 (named Roll) at 85
degrees and XM-2 (names Rock) at 115 degrees. Both are 24 transponder C
band satellites with antennas that are positioned to have a footprint for
the CONUS. The footprints extend slightly into Canada and Mexico and about
100 miles offshore.
krj

Doug Dotson wrote:
I thought Sirius and XM worked off of geosynchronous sats over the
equator.

"krj" wrote in message
...

Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal
waters. No Coverage in the BVI and south.
krj

Larry W4CSC wrote:

Terry Spragg wrote in
:



Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant
reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night
with a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad, noisy
antenna.



Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet
stuck to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One
of these days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so
good stuck to the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with
something that always works. It's even sideways from the way it's
supposed to be stuck.....go figure??

XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials
spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA
commercial FM from Clear Channel.

"Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote in news:gp-
:

So the antennas on the bird are directional targeted at the US? Otherwise
I would think that an equal area below the equator would be covered.

Doug


No, most US-targeted satellite services have directional antennas pointed
this way. It's bad enough trying to get enough field strength to lock up
the cheap XM/Sirius receivers with miniscule antennas so tiny. They're
pointed to the States, all right.

Wonder how they'd work duct taped to the side of the feedhorn of the Dish
Network antenna pointed at the XM bird?....hmm....

Having a more serious receiver antenna capture area would seem to extend
their range much farther than that little plastic blob magmounted to the
fire extinguisher.

Using an antenna on a dish would work for XM if you put the feed at the
correct focal point for C band (DirectTV and Dish are Ku band), but
would be a problem for Sirius because their three satellites are not
GEO. They are LEO in an eliptical orbit so you would need the latest
Keplers and a tracking antenna. Also they are at 2.3 Ghz.
krj

Larry W4CSC wrote:

"Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote in news:gp-
:


So the antennas on the bird are directional targeted at the US? Otherwise
I would think that an equal area below the equator would be covered.

Doug



No, most US-targeted satellite services have directional antennas pointed
this way. It's bad enough trying to get enough field strength to lock up
the cheap XM/Sirius receivers with miniscule antennas so tiny. They're
pointed to the States, all right.

Wonder how they'd work duct taped to the side of the feedhorn of the Dish
Network antenna pointed at the XM bird?....hmm....

Having a more serious receiver antenna capture area would seem to extend
their range much farther than that little plastic blob magmounted to the
fire extinguisher.

The antennas are directional in what is called a spot beam. If they were
omni they would cover equal distance North/South but a LOT more power
would be required to have the required EIRP to be received by the auto
antennas.
krj

Doug Dotson wrote:

So the antennas on the bird are directional targeted at the US? Otherwise
I would think that an equal area below the equator would be covered.

Doug

"krj" wrote in message
...

There are two satellites in geosynchronous orbit, XM-1 (named Roll) at 85
degrees and XM-2 (names Rock) at 115 degrees. Both are 24 transponder C
band satellites with antennas that are positioned to have a footprint for
the CONUS. The footprints extend slightly into Canada and Mexico and about
100 miles offshore.
krj

Doug Dotson wrote:

I thought Sirius and XM worked off of geosynchronous sats over the
equator.

"krj" wrote in message
.. .


Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal
waters. No Coverage in the BVI and south.
krj

Larry W4CSC wrote:


Terry Spragg wrote in
:




Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant
reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night
with a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad, noisy
antenna.



Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet
stuck to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One
of these days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so
good stuck to the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with
something that always works. It's even sideways from the way it's
supposed to be stuck.....go figure??

XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials
spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA
commercial FM from Clear Channel.

In article ,
"Doug Dotson" dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom wrote:

I thought Sirius and XM worked off of geosynchronous sats over the equator.

"krj" wrote in message
...
Problem is that XM and Sirius only work in the US and near coastal waters.
No Coverage in the BVI and south.
krj

Larry W4CSC wrote:
Terry Spragg wrote in
:


Normally, I would want my entertainment radio to have excellant
reception, and could not bear to be at anchor on a hot, buggy night with
a nice new tune just barely distinguishable through a bad, noisy antenna.



Is now a good time to show off the XM Radio satellite antenna magnet
stuck to the side of the fire extinguisher next to the hatch?...(c; One
of these days I gotta actually find a place to put it but it works so
good stuck to the fire extinguisher I hate to screw around with something
that always works. It's even sideways from the way it's supposed to be
stuck.....go figure??

XM is the way to fly, not that damned string of continuous commercials
spaced with minor bits of "programming" playing in between......on USA
commercial FM from Clear Channel.



XM is geosynch using SpotBeams, but Sirius is using none-geosynch, and
the farther north you go the bigger the dropout when the Sat
Constellation can't cover the area. for southeastern alaska we lose
signal about 2 hours out of 12 with what Sirius has running now.


Bruce in alaska
--
add a 2 before @