Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Glen "Wiley" Wilson" wrote in
message ... But SP2 is an improvement over the naked XP system I referenced. The naked XP, without SP1 was even more crap. What do you think XP stands for? Windows eXPerimental..... :-) Meindert |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:20:00 +0200, "Meindert Sprang"
wrote: "Glen "Wiley" Wilson" wrote in message ... But SP2 is an improvement over the naked XP system I referenced. The naked XP, without SP1 was even more crap. What do you think XP stands for? Windows eXPerimental..... :-) Meindert Yeah. By naked, I really meant systems without a solid (i.e. non-Microsoft) firewall and up to date anti-virus package. Which doesn't make what you say untrue. I have to say though, as Windows sytems go, my personal experience has been that XP is head and shoulders above the rest as far as stability goes. I'm almost happy with it, on that score. It's still a pig with a clunky interface, though. As for virus susceptibility, take a linux system, chmod 777 everything, and set the default creation permissions likewise. Just for fun, have everyone run as root full time. That's your basic Windows architecture, right? Then spend the rest of your life putting band-aids on the severed limbs that result. Great fun. And we haven't even touched Windows networking yet... __________________________________________________ __________ Glen "Wiley" Wilson usenet1 SPAMNIX at world wide wiley dot com To reply, lose the capitals and do the obvious. Take a look at cpRepeater, my NMEA data integrator, repeater, and logger at http://www.worldwidewiley.com/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Glen "Wiley" Wilson" wrote in
message ... Yeah. By naked, I really meant systems without a solid (i.e. non-Microsoft) firewall and up to date anti-virus package. Which doesn't make what you say untrue. I have to say though, as Windows sytems go, my personal experience has been that XP is head and shoulders above the rest as far as stability goes. I'm almost happy with it, on that score. It's still a pig with a clunky interface, though. That's why I stick to Win2000 on my desktop and Linux for my server. I've heard too many horrorstories, especially when XP just came out. I know a lot has been fixed, but still...... Meindert |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Meindert Sprang" wrote: "Glen "Wiley" Wilson" wrote in message ... But SP2 is an improvement over the naked XP system I referenced. The naked XP, without SP1 was even more crap. What do you think XP stands for? Windows eXPerimental..... :-) Meindert What does Windows XP stand for??? Windows Xtra Pain |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|