Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Meindert Sprang
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Glen "Wiley" Wilson" wrote in
message ...
But SP2 is an improvement over the naked XP system I referenced.


The naked XP, without SP1 was even more crap. What do you think XP stands
for?
Windows eXPerimental.....

:-)
Meindert


  #2   Report Post  
Glen \Wiley\ Wilson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:20:00 +0200, "Meindert Sprang"
wrote:

"Glen "Wiley" Wilson" wrote in
message ...
But SP2 is an improvement over the naked XP system I referenced.


The naked XP, without SP1 was even more crap. What do you think XP stands
for?
Windows eXPerimental.....

:-)
Meindert

Yeah. By naked, I really meant systems without a solid (i.e.
non-Microsoft) firewall and up to date anti-virus package. Which
doesn't make what you say untrue. I have to say though, as Windows
sytems go, my personal experience has been that XP is head and
shoulders above the rest as far as stability goes. I'm almost happy
with it, on that score. It's still a pig with a clunky interface,
though.

As for virus susceptibility, take a linux system, chmod 777
everything, and set the default creation permissions likewise. Just
for fun, have everyone run as root full time. That's your basic
Windows architecture, right? Then spend the rest of your life putting
band-aids on the severed limbs that result. Great fun. And we
haven't even touched Windows networking yet...
__________________________________________________ __________
Glen "Wiley" Wilson usenet1 SPAMNIX at world wide wiley dot com
To reply, lose the capitals and do the obvious.

Take a look at cpRepeater, my NMEA data integrator, repeater, and
logger at http://www.worldwidewiley.com/
  #3   Report Post  
Meindert Sprang
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Glen "Wiley" Wilson" wrote in
message ...
Yeah. By naked, I really meant systems without a solid (i.e.
non-Microsoft) firewall and up to date anti-virus package. Which
doesn't make what you say untrue. I have to say though, as Windows
sytems go, my personal experience has been that XP is head and
shoulders above the rest as far as stability goes. I'm almost happy
with it, on that score. It's still a pig with a clunky interface,
though.


That's why I stick to Win2000 on my desktop and Linux for my server. I've
heard too many horrorstories, especially when XP just came out. I know a lot
has been fixed, but still......

Meindert


  #4   Report Post  
Mike O'Dell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Meindert Sprang" wrote:

"Glen "Wiley" Wilson" wrote in
message ...
But SP2 is an improvement over the naked XP system I referenced.


The naked XP, without SP1 was even more crap. What do you think XP stands
for?
Windows eXPerimental.....

:-)
Meindert



What does Windows XP stand for???

Windows Xtra Pain
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017