"Steve Lusardi" wrote in
:

Ethernet has it all covered, but Meidert and I have had this
discussion a while back and I didn't convince him then. Maybe today,
he's older now. Steve


Meindert, no offense, but he makes NMEA multiplexers. Ethernet would be
the end of that business.



--
iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships.

Larry

Larry,
Actually, I think exactly the opposite is true. I believe NMEA multiplexers could be made using NMEA over TCP/IP on an Ethernet
backbone transparently to the end NMEA device. This technique is used commonly in existing networks today, where the TCP/IP header
is used exclusively for routing purposes and at the endpoint device, the TCP/IP header is stripped and the NMEA sentence is
presented to the NMEA customer bit serial transparently in the normal manner. Similar devices already exist on the market as
Ethernet gateways to RS232/422 devices. Additionally, advanced QOS is available for priority routing if required, preserving the
advantage of manufacturer independence and all the advantages of Ethernet. I personally believe this represents a golden
opportunity.
Steve

"Larry" wrote in message ...
"Steve Lusardi" wrote in
:

Ethernet has it all covered, but Meidert and I have had this
discussion a while back and I didn't convince him then. Maybe today,
he's older now. Steve


Meindert, no offense, but he makes NMEA multiplexers. Ethernet would be
the end of that business.



--
iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships.

Larry

"Larry" wrote in message
...
"Steve Lusardi" wrote in
:

Ethernet has it all covered, but Meidert and I have had this
discussion a while back and I didn't convince him then. Maybe today,
he's older now. Steve


Meindert, no offense, but he makes NMEA multiplexers. Ethernet would be
the end of that business.

Not at all. I'll be having a MiniPlex-2E in a couple of days.

Meindert