Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ham who invented CLOVER tried to get all the manufacturers interested in
the technology. Kantronics, MFJ, etc. No interest until he approached HAL. I have heard he GAVE the technology to them. The MARS ops seem to love it, but it is too pricey for me. 73 Doug "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... "Doug" wrote in hlink.net: Since Larry seems to be the self appointed expert on this mode, I would like to know how PSK31 compares CLOVER for weak signal digital modes? 73 Doug K7ABX Can't say. I never ran Clover because it was overpriced and proprietary. I've never been crazy about overpriced and proprietary. One fault of PSK31 is its NOT an error-checking mode grinding the transmitter on and off looking for an ACK response. It's more like FEC, but I don't know what it's FEC capabilities are to correct errors. I think Clover is also error correcting by grinding away until the data packet gets a successful ACK, isn't it? Not in the same league. PSK31 simply copies when I can't even hear the station its copying in all the noise. It's not meant for data transfer, just text between stations in an open system. There is no "connected" mode, like packet or SITOR or PACTOR or such. Larry W4CSC |