Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Meindert Sprang" wrote
"Jack Painter" wrote in message news ![]() C'mon ol' salt, you should know the inside of copper pipe is electrically identical to both sides of copper strap when a bonding connection is made to either. Skin effect of electrical current is felt equally on both in _that_ condition. No it isn't. Consider a massive rod of 1". RF flows at the outside due to skin effect. No remove the innards of the rod, leaving, say 1/16" of wall. Why would current suddenly flow at the inner surface? It isn't, for the same reason it was on the outside when the rod was massive. Besides, heavy coils in radio stations are all tubes and cooled by running water through them. Due to the skinn effect, the water is not 'touched' by the RF. Electromagnetic induction on a material from one outside direction sees skin effect on the outside surface only of a closed structure, cabinet, pipe, etc. But we are not talking about EMF's. Yes we are. And EMF is exactly the reason why the electrons start to repell eachother. And the only place where they are as far apart as possible is on the outside of the tube. Meindert, water is not a good conductor, with average tap water having 100,000 ohms resistance across 1 meter of 15mm plastic pipe filled with water. Even at RF frequencies, where skin effect is most pronounced, a bonded connection made equally to both inside and outside of a copper pipe should exhibit skin effect throughout most of the entire cross section of the copper pipe. This is because the wall thickness of the copper pipe is not materially different from copper strap. Example: For copper tubing used as a inductor in antenna tuners: coil length R= --------------------------------------- conductivity *skindepth*2pi*coil radius Now, applying voltage to the outer surface only of copper tubing with closed ends, whether by EMF attachment or bonded connection to the outside only, would exhibit surface-only skin effect similar to if a faraday cage was constructed of the same copper strap we are talking about. The outside surface would carry most current. But if the voltage connection was bonded to both inside and outside of an opening of the faraday box or the copper tubing, then current via skin effect would be nearly constant on the inside and outside surfaces of the box, defeating the faraday effect. The condition I originally described, that of a bonded connection, applies voltage equally and carries current equally on the entire skin of the conductor, inside and out, 360 degrees, as efficiently as a piece of copper strap of similar cross section. Best regards, Jack Painter Virginia Beach, Va |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SSB Antenna theory | Electronics | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Cruising | |||
Notes on short SSB antennas, for Larry | Electronics | |||
How to use a simple SWR meter and what it means to your VHF | Electronics |