LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Meindert Sprang
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wireless 802.11 NMEA server

"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:08:42 +0100, "Meindert Sprang"
wrote:


That is nonsense. It all depends on proper PCB design. I HAVE measured

it,
for crying out loud!


Gee, the manufacturers that HAVE to pass FCC specs on radiation don't
know that. They spend lots of money coating cases, using metal
cabinets, and other shielding. You should go into consulting. Organ
manufacturers would love to put out digital organs and keyboards
without having to coat the whole thing in tin foil and expensive
shielded boxes with foil shielded data lines to pass the FCC tests.


Of course it all depends on the application. Certain areas just need
complete shielding where extremely low limits are required. All I am saying
is that to get something like NMEA equipment quiet and unsusceptible to HF
and VHF at reasonable levels like specified in IEC and FCC standards
applicable to that kind of equipment, it is not necessary to have everything
shielded. And I believe a lot of equipment present on the market prove this
statement.

And judging from your previous posts here in this group, the interference
problems you have had are caused by certain NMEA equipment that is
definately not FCC approved. Check the multiplexer and expander you so much
prefer: no FCC approval and well known to produce interference.

Whoa, sport! Your attack on me was about 4800 baud NMEA and it
RADIATES LIKE HELL into the HF on every boat I know of because of the
way you manufacturers treat the interconnects, dangling the 4800 baud
pulses out there in unshielded space. Quit sidestepping the issue.


I am not sidestepping the issue. I just happen to have good experience with
NMEA, without any interference on HF.

Unshielded 4800 baud data has no place around a submicrovolt HF
receiver within a few feet of its receiving antenna....


Like I said befo with properly filtered outputs, which is just mandatory
if you want to get something through the IEC of FCC tests, there will be no
problem. I mean, it is stupid to have NMEA drivers capable of running at
10Mbaud if you only have to drive 4800 baud. So with the properly
dimensioned drivers and RC networks, the slew-rate of the output datasignal
is brought back so such a low figure, that there are no significant
harmonics present over a few 100 kHz.

AS with consumer electronics, until the regulators step in to force
the manufacturers to conform to some sort of radiation standard,
nothing will change.


I don't understand what your implying here. Navigation electronics without
specific IEC945 approval falls in the same category as consumer electronics
and is therefore subject to the same EMC limits. So there ARE regulations
enforced.

But we seem to keep on disagreeing on this subject. So lets end this
discussion.

Best,
Meindert


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2003 Cingular Wireless Winterfest Boat Parade presented by Nokia Kathy Keleher General 1 December 3rd 03 08:59 PM
Save your Win 3.1 notebook for NMEA testing..... Larry W4CSC Electronics 5 November 4th 03 01:44 PM
Laptop passive cooling idea Glen Electronics 18 October 30th 03 07:08 PM
Before you connect new NMEA and blow your network.... Larry W4CSC Cruising 5 September 29th 03 07:28 PM
Before you connect new NMEA and blow your network.... Larry W4CSC Electronics 5 September 29th 03 07:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017