LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Doug Dotson
 
Posts: n/a
Default GPS map vs charts

Keeping paper charts as a backup is a must. Electronic devices
can and will fail. Raster charts are just scanned paper charts so the
accuracy is pretty much identical. Keeping them both updated is
a chore. Vector charts (like CMAP) are digitized from those same
paper charts so the accuracy is also affected by the digitization
process. Our CMAP charts showed us going over land a few times
on the ICW and especially in the Bahamas. All in all, the convenience
of the electronic chart at the helm was very valuable. We would have
run aground quite a bit more often if we were using paper charts simply
because the immedeate feedback of having an electronic chart right in
front of us when at the helm is hard to beat. In our case the device is
a NAVMAN 5500.

Doug
s/v Callista

"David Ditch" wrote in message
...
Is a GPS map like the Garmin 176C a good alternative to carrying NOAA

maps?
I live in the Chesapeake and would like to not have to carry large maps
around with me.

Worth the expense if I have the money?

David






 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More Chesapeake Crusing Questions - Charts Sandy K. Cruising 0 March 11th 04 02:52 PM
What?! Charts, again!? Skip Gundlach Cruising 12 February 13th 04 03:58 PM
Practical alternative to buying paper charts? Ken Coit Cruising 7 August 21st 03 10:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017