Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keeping paper charts as a backup is a must. Electronic devices
can and will fail. Raster charts are just scanned paper charts so the accuracy is pretty much identical. Keeping them both updated is a chore. Vector charts (like CMAP) are digitized from those same paper charts so the accuracy is also affected by the digitization process. Our CMAP charts showed us going over land a few times on the ICW and especially in the Bahamas. All in all, the convenience of the electronic chart at the helm was very valuable. We would have run aground quite a bit more often if we were using paper charts simply because the immedeate feedback of having an electronic chart right in front of us when at the helm is hard to beat. In our case the device is a NAVMAN 5500. Doug s/v Callista "David Ditch" wrote in message ... Is a GPS map like the Garmin 176C a good alternative to carrying NOAA maps? I live in the Chesapeake and would like to not have to carry large maps around with me. Worth the expense if I have the money? David |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Chesapeake Crusing Questions - Charts | Cruising | |||
What?! Charts, again!? | Cruising | |||
Practical alternative to buying paper charts? | Cruising |