Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jere Lull wrote:
On 2008-11-13 03:40:42 -0500, "Edgar" said: This is the first time anyone has mentioned the 'bottle brush' but I have always believed that a spiky device at the very top of the lightning rod is essntial if it is to act effectively to reduce the possibility of a dangerous strike. That is one theory, the use of a "bottle brush" conductor is another; there are others. Knowing a bit about electrical engineering, electricity and electronics, I can follow the observations and math and find good points in many of the theories advanced. The problem is that no matter how long scientists (and snake-oil salesmen) have been studying the problem, lightning strikes are relatively random (determined by cosmic rays?) with the probability of a strike in a particular location only slightly affected by man-made agents. Well, there is the exception of the folks at U of Fl. who launch rockets trailing thin wires into thunder clouds........ Other than that, fair enough.. Cheers Martin |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Emergency lightning protection | Cruising | |||
radios & electronics, lightning protection | Cruising | |||
Lightning protection | ASA | |||
Best protection against UV | General | |||
Lightning protection for a small cruiser? Dynaplate? Metal wishbone mast? J Pole antenna? | Boat Building |