Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cruiser?
Sailboat? The 'standard' mast is a lightning rod. No arguements, if you are gonna get hit, that's where it will be, or the shrouds, which should conduct at the masthead, and not at the chain plates. One should not encourage lightning to traverse thin wires holding up the mast. A bipod mast system is probably best for this purpose, but may not be so good for sailing. A heavy flat copper conductor, outboard, from gunnel bipod mast tabernacles to the keel or sea may be a good idea. Fixed keel? My cast iron keels are the grounded elements underwater. I expect lightning would boil off some antifouling paint. Paint is an insulator, thin, easily arced across by lightning. That would be the best place to take heat damage. Heavy conducting king post? Or very heavy wire straight run connecting mast base to keel bolt. If the wire is smaller than the keel bolt, the wire will explode before the keel bolt does, according to ohm's law. The bedding compound at the keel / bolt interface seems to have been where the bolt found ground. I have external keel bolts holding the keel flanges to the hull. I have a bilge keeler, two shallow keels side by side. Actually, I expected the crimped wire terminal ends to be the victims at failure. Survivors will still be afloat. Oversized keel bolts? The bigger the better, for resistive / conductive purposes. Just my thoughts, backed by my experience and observations. I have an old mast hanging in the trees in my back yard with 25 holes eaten into it by one multi strike wowser of a lightning strike while moored unattended at the dock. We suffered no other damage. The VHF masthead AE and the radio were untouched. The 4 bolts securing the tabernacle to the top of the king post pierce the overhead in the cabin, and were not damaged or overheated by the strike. Most of the heat damage occurred at the places where the arc contacted the aluminium mast, all 25 holes in a neat dotted line down one side from the masthead to the spreaders about 8" apart, all along a line of similar curvature on the surface of the mast, not the most severely curved part. I think the geometery of the curvature must have somehow been attractive to the lightning. The bigger holes were nearer the top. The bedding compound in the keel bolt hole in the hull used to ground the mast appeared to have suffered some heat damage, possibly boiled trapped contaminated moisture, and suffered a very slow drip leak until resealed ashore by the insurance paid repair guy. Knowing what I know now, and desiring to minimize damage, I would use the same system I have now, and accept that 1/2" holes in the mast where the arc chewed it up is better than a cabin full of people with boiled copper vapour burns and possibly eye injuries, which might happen with a ground wire of just the wrong undersize. Keep all electrical system wiring away from lightning ground systems. The electrical system aboard does not need a ground to the sea, including radio antennae, in my opinion. Galvanic corrosion is enabled mainly by grounding systems not well thought out. Insulated drive shaft couplings are a good idea, IMHO. A small zink on the prop shaft would protect the shaft and prop, if of dis-similar metals. Through hulls should be insulated from the sea with paint or wax if neccessary. Dynaplates are not of any use whatsoever. You can't paint them, they oxidize quickly underwater, insulating themselves, they accomplish nothing, and soon acquire hitch hikers. I admit, there is one on my boat, and it's been antifouled, and not removed because it is the common D.C. ground aboard almost under the engine, which I am presently loath to rewire and patch the hole, as it doesn't need it, yet. My ohm meter indicated it is an open circuit (no connection) to the sea. The distribution of heat generated by a lightning strike can be controlled by proper distribution of resistive components in the protection system, provided that God is not steering the lightning bolt manually, right between the shrouds and into your neck hole. The thinnest metal (in the mast) is what took the brunt. As it should be. A system of ropes on the tiller enables one to steer from below even in a hailstorm. Have you ever sailed in a hailstorm? I have. Not fun. An insulated (wooden) mast would need a lightning ground conductor attached to it. Unprotected trees hit by lightning explode. Don't want that to happen to my mast. Terry K SaltDiver wrote: -- Terry K - My email address is MY PROPERTY, and is protected by copyright legislation. Permission to reproduce it is specifically denied for mass mailing and unrequested solicitations. Reproduction or conveyance for any unauthorised purpose is THEFT and PLAGIARISM. Abuse is Invasion of privacy and harassment. Abusers may be prosecuted. -This notice footer released to public domain. Spamspoof salad by spamchock - SofDevCo |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I havent' been following this thread so the following may already have
been posted, but I was reading an old copy of "Royce's" which says on a rig with aluminum mast and stainless steel rigging the ground must be connected to the mast not the rigging (eg chainplate) because stainless steel is a very poor conductor of electicity compared to aluminum. If hit the charge will travel down the mast, not the shrouds. The book recommends a copper ground from the mast to a copper plate attached to the exterior of the hull below the waterline. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|