Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Roger Long schrieb: I only have 6" under the cabin sole. How critical is the 8" bend? Can I compensate for the tighter radius by increasing the conductor cross section? How much? The turn is more than 90 degrees because the straps have to run back up the hull deadrise about two feet to where I can locate the plates and through bolts. I don't think putting the plates on the keel sides is feasible. Hello, the problem with the bends of the conductors is when the bend is to tight, the lightning current will not follow the bend, it will leave the conductor an flash thru the air in a direct line to the next best earth point. Increasing the cross section does not help, you only can connect more of these bends in parallel. Bye |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Emergency lightning protection | Cruising | |||
radios & electronics, lightning protection | Cruising | |||
Lightning protection | ASA | |||
Best protection against UV | General | |||
Lightning protection for a small cruiser? Dynaplate? Metal wishbone mast? J Pole antenna? | Boat Building |