![]() |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:48:24 -0400, "Ernest Scribbler"
wrote: wrote You can imagine how that feature is amplified when the boat is 260 feet long, and pivots on it's keel! The side of the MT was probably traveling faster towards the SB than the SB was traveling forward. Sounds like an excellent reason to stay the heck out of its way. SF Bay is what, 2-3 miles wide? I'm guessing they just wanted a closer look and the plan had some flaws. 40 foot sailboats sail very close to each other all the time when racing, so it doesn't seem that unusual. It doesn't always end in a collison. I'll bet they didn't have the entire bay to themselves, either. |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:10:13 -0700 (PDT), Two meter troll
wrote: On Oct 16, 12:25*pm, wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:17:03 -0700 (PDT), Two meter troll wrote: On Oct 16, 11:47*am, wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:32:45 -0700 (PDT), Two meter troll wrote: ummm......my thought was how stupid do you actually have to be to run a 40' boat into the side of a 200' boat in day time with good visability. Then i read this page and yall act as if the guy in the 200' boat that got nailed in the SIDE was at fault. most boats dont move sideways throught the water nor do they instantly make full speed. what it looks to me is yet another gawker was going by and was not paying attention to the helm (I assume he was looking in a camera or something) and smashed into some one elses boat. happens all the bloody time. I assure you that when the Maltese Falcon turns, her stern slides sideways for quite a distance. It would not be that hard for someone in a much smaller boat to misjudge how much room was needed to avoid a collision. This is not nearly as simple a situation as you seem to think. its pretty simple from my stand point you dont get close to another boat unless you are planning to come along side. you avoid collisions. it comes down to a simple statement: you operate your vessel safely and well clear of other vessels when you have the option. this fella had the option and he decided to ignore a safe working distance. If anything, he was simply as inexperienced as you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dog you have no idea of my experiance. You've painted a picture. |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
On Oct 16, 1:30*pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: .... All your guesses mean NOTHING. Both boats were at fault as neither boat took action to avoid a close quarters situation. Both captains were asleep at the wheel and negligent. ... That both were at fault is almost axiomatic. It took poor judgment by both parties to get into the situation where we first see them in the photographs. It is important and useful to point that out. I thought I had made that clear before, but if not it is good of you to point it out. However, the evidence we have is the series of photographs and a short statement from the owner of MF both of them concerning the minute or two before collision. By that time both had sinned by getting into a dangerous situation. A post mortem of the evidence that we have could help determine what actually happened and what mistakes were made. From that one might apportion blame and credit (if there is any) and learn something about what better options the skippers might have had given the situation as it existed. I hope there is more to be learned here than that "both captains were ... negligent". --Tom. |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:30:48 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: (ii) such risk may sometimes exist even when an appreciable bearing change is evident, particularly when approaching a very large vessel or a tow or when approaching a vessel at close range. This is an important point. With an approaching large vessel you could take a bearing on the bow and get a changing angle, same on the stern with the angle changing in the opposite direction. The end result would be a collision amidships. |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
wrote
40 foot sailboats sail very close to each other all the time when racing, so it doesn't seem that unusual. Maybe, but I consider myself pretty darn close when I'm less than a boat length from somebody. The difference in a racing situation is you expect other boats to be there and you have a pretty good idea where they're planning to go, to say nothing of the fact that you'll seldom run into one ten times your size. |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:01:23 -0400, "Ernest Scribbler"
wrote: wrote 40 foot sailboats sail very close to each other all the time when racing, so it doesn't seem that unusual. Maybe, but I consider myself pretty darn close when I'm less than a boat length from somebody. The difference in a racing situation is you expect other boats to be there and you have a pretty good idea where they're planning to go, to say nothing of the fact that you'll seldom run into one ten times your size. I was just pointing out that to many sailors, close quarters is not unusual. That attitude may have played a part. |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message
. .. wrote 40 foot sailboats sail very close to each other all the time when racing, so it doesn't seem that unusual. Maybe, but I consider myself pretty darn close when I'm less than a boat length from somebody. The difference in a racing situation is you expect other boats to be there and you have a pretty good idea where they're planning to go, to say nothing of the fact that you'll seldom run into one ten times your size. I do also, but it's not all that unusual. However, I know I would not get that close to 260' long boat if I could avoid it. I don't think we have quite enough facts to decide who was primarily at fault, but it seems to me that unless you're at anchor, sounding signals as such, with the proper lights as required, AND you have six nuns aboard, you're probably going to share some of the blame. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
On Oct 16, 2:36*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:10:13 -0700 (PDT), Two meter troll wrote: On Oct 16, 12:25*pm, wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:17:03 -0700 (PDT), Two meter troll wrote: On Oct 16, 11:47*am, wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:32:45 -0700 (PDT), Two meter troll wrote: ummm......my thought was how stupid do you actually have to be to run a 40' boat into the side of a 200' boat in day time with good visability. Then i read this page and yall act as if the guy in the 200' boat that got nailed in the SIDE was at fault. most boats dont move sideways throught the water nor do they instantly make full speed. what it looks to me is yet another gawker was going by and was not paying attention to the helm (I assume he was looking in a camera or something) and smashed into some one elses boat. happens all the bloody time. I assure you that when the Maltese Falcon turns, her stern slides sideways for quite a distance. It would not be that hard for someone in a much smaller boat to misjudge how much room was needed to avoid a collision. This is not nearly as simple a situation as you seem to think. its pretty simple from my stand point you dont get close to another boat unless you are planning to come along side. you avoid collisions. it comes down to a simple statement: you operate your vessel safely and well clear of other vessels when you have the option. this fella had the option and he decided to ignore a safe working distance. If anything, he was simply as inexperienced as you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dog you have no idea of my experiance. You've painted a picture.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Actually i have not "painted a picture" as you put it. You have accumulated a minimum of factual data and a maximum of opinion, mine and others on this board and you think you know me. Mostly what you have is my views of east coast sailors and that this board is full of yachetys who have money and few boat brains. you have several tidbits of emergancy repairs that work; scandelize those folks who hang out in the white boat end of the marina and didn't come frome some sour old fart in the pond. You have that i asked for a free sail boat if someone had one rotting out back of the house. you also have that i dont take just a batch pixels and trust them to the fullest. you might infer that i think several of the stuffed shirts in this group are much less than gods. lastly you know that I cannot spell. If you had perhaps been paying attention you might know that i tend to not be on the board for several months at a time. pretty scanty picture (more like a doodle on a knapkin) i am at least able to doodle effectivly. o handle your other point. yes, In a race boats are close to each other: where these boats in a race? |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
On Oct 16, 5:27*pm, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message . .. wrote 40 foot sailboats sail very close to each other all the time when racing, so it doesn't seem that unusual. Maybe, but I consider myself pretty darn close when I'm less than a boat length from somebody. The difference in a racing situation is you expect other boats to be there and you have a pretty good idea where they're planning to go, to say nothing of the fact that you'll seldom run into one ten times your size. I do also, but it's not all that unusual. However, I know I would not get that close to 260' long boat if I could avoid it. I don't think we have quite enough facts to decide who was primarily at fault, but it seems to me that unless you're at anchor, sounding signals as such, with the proper lights as required, AND you have six nuns aboard, you're probably going to share some of the blame. -- "j" ganz Mr.Ganz you said a mouth full. i think the nuns might have to be replaced by the pope these days. |
crash boom bucks! Dumb question
Thanks... I don't know about replacing the nuns with the pope... I have a
pope-soap-on-a-rope someone gave me as a gift.... LOL "Two meter troll" wrote in message ... On Oct 16, 5:27 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Ernest Scribbler" wrote in message . .. wrote 40 foot sailboats sail very close to each other all the time when racing, so it doesn't seem that unusual. Maybe, but I consider myself pretty darn close when I'm less than a boat length from somebody. The difference in a racing situation is you expect other boats to be there and you have a pretty good idea where they're planning to go, to say nothing of the fact that you'll seldom run into one ten times your size. I do also, but it's not all that unusual. However, I know I would not get that close to 260' long boat if I could avoid it. I don't think we have quite enough facts to decide who was primarily at fault, but it seems to me that unless you're at anchor, sounding signals as such, with the proper lights as required, AND you have six nuns aboard, you're probably going to share some of the blame. -- "j" ganz Mr.Ganz you said a mouth full. i think the nuns might have to be replaced by the pope these days. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com