Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:09:07 -0700, "Evan Gatehouse"
wrote: "Brian Whatcott" wrote in message .. . I found this test interesting. I was surprized how well the swaged cable performed. About as well as the best swageless. And swages cost about 50 cents each. These days, I take a chinese wire cutter ($15) and grind a swaging profile in the jaws, so the extended cost at these prices is one off $16 unit $16 ten off $25 unit $2.50 100 off $115 unit $1.15 I would very much like to know small quantity prices on all the swageless terminals on the market - amny offers? Brian Whatcott Altus OK p.s. This hand swager is capable of applying excessive deformations - easily, so a reasonable swaging jaw profile is required. I think you might be confusing a Nicropress type sleeve (that is applied with a lever type hand squeezer) with a swaged terminal that uses very expensive hydraulic roller presses that squeeze the swage terminal. I've seen Nicropress sleeves for about what you mention, but swage fittings run about $15 for a 1/4" for example. I was certainly thinking of a Nicopress style swage. In reading the boating press comparitive test, I understood the upper end of the test section was nicopressed with two sleeves, and a bolted clamp. Nicopress swages are used for light aircraft control cables (which are safety-critical.) Did I them misunderstand that the comparitive test was against a swage-compressed stainless terminal? Brian Whatcott Altus OK |