Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 18, 10:01 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:27:23 -0700 (PDT), wrote: If someone has unlimited electrical power, is he likely to keep his Radar on all the time when he is far offshore? Offshore, far from anything else with a functioning radar system, what would prevent someone from detecting a sailboat before a collision. Assume clear weather. Sailboats are notoriously poor reflectors. Even with RADAR reflectors mounted on the mast, they don't always give much of a return. Far offshore and away from known routes, it's usual to put the RADAR on the "Watch" setting, which cycles it between standby and transmit modes. You can set it to wake up and take a look around every 10 minutes, 20 minutes, whatever you want. This is a pretty standard feature on most RADARS that you find on recreational vessels. RADAR doesn't use nearly as much power as you seem to think. I sure don't have unlimited electrical power on my sailboat with a 9.9 hp outboard alternator as my only battery charger. I still use my RADAR a lot. I just don't leave it in transmit mode when I'm not looking at it. Surely the sailboat would give some radar return before the collision (assuming it is on). In clear conditions, what might cause somebody to disregard a radar alarm? How often do radars return false echoes in calm conditions? Just how "invisible" are most sailboats, say 30' to radar without a reflector? Would objects such as downriggers or other things aloft on the boat with radar cause false returns? I see that some radars can be set to look only in a specified arc and ignore things elsewhere. I assume that is to avoid looking behind and concentrate on looking ahead. Why does this matter? Are false returns enough of an issue to cause someone to only look ahead? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Not looking behind you would be a serious error in operation of your boat. You need to stay aware of all 360 degrees. That was brought home to me many years ago. I was (in UK then) leaving the Solent by the easterly channel in darkness. Nice calm night, good visibility, beautiful display of shore lights, so no problem. Then I looked behind and to my horror saw a large dark shape with port and starboard lights both showing with a white masthead light dead centre between them. In other words a large ship was rapidly overtaking me. I got out of the channel sharpish and ever since then have never failed to keep an allround lookout. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edgar wrote:
wrote in message ... Not looking behind you would be a serious error in operation of your boat. You need to stay aware of all 360 degrees. That was brought home to me many years ago. I was (in UK then) leaving the Solent by the easterly channel in darkness. Nice calm night, good visibility, beautiful display of shore lights, so no problem. Then I looked behind and to my horror saw a large dark shape with port and starboard lights both showing with a white masthead light dead centre between them. In other words a large ship was rapidly overtaking me. I got out of the channel sharpish and ever since then have never failed to keep an allround lookout. That's why I've been more iterested in radar monitors that radar systems for sailboats. Besides the power drain. -- Richard (remove the X to email) |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Edgar" wrote in message
... wrote in message ... Not looking behind you would be a serious error in operation of your boat. You need to stay aware of all 360 degrees. That was brought home to me many years ago. I was (in UK then) leaving the Solent by the easterly channel in darkness. Nice calm night, good visibility, beautiful display of shore lights, so no problem. Then I looked behind and to my horror saw a large dark shape with port and starboard lights both showing with a white masthead light dead centre between them. In other words a large ship was rapidly overtaking me. I got out of the channel sharpish and ever since then have never failed to keep an allround lookout. Didn't have quite the thrilling experience... we were offshore, sailing south from SF to Cabo (non-stop delivery), out about 80nm or so. Always kept a watch and during the day saw a large vessel on the horizon behind us and closing. Sure, we're stand-on. In any case, we made preparation to remove the jibe preventer to head up from a broad to beam reach just in case. Didn't like the idea of playing chicken with a 200m tanker. However, after a few minutes it was clear that she was changing course to avoid us, so we held our course. They never answered our hails, but we thanked them anyway. We were on a 48' ketch. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SNIP
If you are offshore in a small boat *assume that you are *not* being seen, and *be prepared to take effective evasive action regardless of your percieved right-of-way. Agreed!! For that matter assume you're invisible anytime you're out, offshore or for a day sail. Matt |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Sep 2008 15:30:02 -0500, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:21:19 -0700 (PDT), said: Surely the sailboat would give some radar return before the collision (assuming it is on). Not at all surely. I recall many occasions on the bridge of a Navy ship when sailboats were not picked up on radar. And as you know, Navy vessels have their radar on all the time, and someone monitoring it constantly in CIC. It's particularly likely the sailboat won't be seen if it doesn't have a large inboard. While it may, or may not, apply to western flagged vessels, I have twice called passing merchant vessels and asked if I was showing a good return on their radar. In both cases there was a long enough wait for a response to have allowed them to turn on the radar. I don't *know* that their sets were off but it certainly appeared so to me. Both cases were S.E.A. flagged vessels. The case in New Zealand of the Korean log carrier running down the yacht seems to reinforce that premise. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NL - [Den Helder] -Offshore - various pictures - file 10 of 10 Den Helder offshore-10.jpg | Tall Ship Photos | |||
NL - [Den Helder] -Offshore - various pictures - file 09 of 10 Den Helder offshore-09.jpg | Tall Ship Photos | |||
NL - [Den Helder] -Offshore - various pictures - file 08 of 10 Den Helder offshore-08.jpg | Tall Ship Photos | |||
NL - [Den Helder] -Offshore - various pictures - file 07 of 10 Den Helder offshore-07.jpg | Tall Ship Photos | |||
NL - [Den Helder] -Offshore - various pictures - file 06 of 10 Den Helder offshore-06.jpg | Tall Ship Photos |