Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 24, 5:17*pm, "Roger Long" wrote:
... *The speed differences, for equal horsepower and displacement, between power cats and monos are significant but much less dramatic. *At low speeds, a cat may even require more. ... I think you're being generous. At low speeds a cat will very likely require more power to attain the same speed as a mono of the same displacement. As Ted Hood was fond of pointing out, at very low speeds fat and heavy may have less resistance than slim and light. Of course, once a boat gets above a very modest speed to length ratio (Fn if you must) a long skinny hull offers less drag than than a short fat one. At some point a really skinny hull will have a tendency to roll over and one solution to that is to split it in two. Another might be to add outriggers. If we're talking fuel consumption at speeds that we're willing to put up with the graph in this paper of fuel/speed for three hull types is interesting: http://www.hiswasymposium.com/pdf/20...el%20Irens.pdf . -- Tom. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AWESOME MOVIE! << I found this movie link in an AOL chatroom. It is based on real evidence and I give it a big thumbs-up. | ASA | |||
Thumbs Down!!! | ASA |