Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So perhaps a valve on both ends plus a check valve or maybe
two check valves. This is getting too complicated to be worth it. Doug s/v Callista "Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... Further thoughts against paralleling such pumps: If the internal check valves in one pump fails then the fluid will flow retrograde in the pump that failed.... and damn little volume is pumped by the pump that remains intact. Typical industrial installation of such a 'system' would require a block and bypass system of cocks/valves and bypass/lock-out piping. In article , Steven Shelikoff wrote: On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:33:26 -0000, Larry W4CSC wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in : That begs the question why are you going to put two pumps in parallel if you only want to run one at a time? Steve Backup? Then I wouldn't put them in parallel without isolation valves. Even if it works when both pumps are good, you don't know how the pump will fail. Steve |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Engine dies- Putters when trying to plane- engine under under heavy load | General | |||
Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. | General | |||
Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. | Boat Building | |||
fuel delivery problem on outboard? help | General | |||
engine paint in fuel system | General |