Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
Default WWP opinions?

Hello,

You may remember me, I'm the newbie who was asking about a trailerable
sailboat a few weeks ago. We decided to go with a small, trailerable boat in
the 15'-17' range, nothing too 'athletic' because we're old farts, and
preferably something with sides and seats because our old butts aren't made
for hanging off the edge of a racer. We're looking for a smallish boat
because it seems like it would be easier for old farts (and possibly senile,
old farts) to assemble at the ramp. And also something easy for old, senile
farts to learn to sail. By appearances alone, the 15' West Wight Potter
seems to have pretty much everything we require and maybe even room for a
portapotty for the Admiral. They also rate high in the "cute" factor, which
also appeals to the Admiral. Anyone here familiar with these boats? I
appreciate your opinions both pro and con. For reference we would be sailing
almost exclusively on inland lakes in Texas with maybe an occasional trip to
the coast once we get some experience and if the boat is capable of sailing
in protected bays.

Thanks in advance for your valued opinions.

--
Everett
'04 KTM 300 EXC (Treefinder)
'75 Kawasaki S3 400 (2-stroke triple)
'74 BMW R90/6 (Gentleman's Express)


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,995
Default WWP opinions?


"txmxrider" wrote in message
...
Hello,

You may remember me, I'm the newbie who was asking about a trailerable
sailboat a few weeks ago. We decided to go with a small, trailerable boat
in
the 15'-17' range, nothing too 'athletic' because we're old farts, and
preferably something with sides and seats because our old butts aren't
made
for hanging off the edge of a racer. We're looking for a smallish boat
because it seems like it would be easier for old farts (and possibly
senile,
old farts) to assemble at the ramp. And also something easy for old,
senile
farts to learn to sail. By appearances alone, the 15' West Wight Potter
seems to have pretty much everything we require and maybe even room for a
portapotty for the Admiral. They also rate high in the "cute" factor,
which
also appeals to the Admiral. Anyone here familiar with these boats? I
appreciate your opinions both pro and con. For reference we would be
sailing
almost exclusively on inland lakes in Texas with maybe an occasional trip
to
the coast once we get some experience and if the boat is capable of
sailing
in protected bays.

Thanks in advance for your valued opinions.

--
Everett
'04 KTM 300 EXC (Treefinder)
'75 Kawasaki S3 400 (2-stroke triple)
'74 BMW R90/6 (Gentleman's Express)



I had a Sandpiper 565 mini cruiser until I sold it a year ago. Great little
boat, comfortable, although a bit cramped in the cabin.
Wife wasn't interested and it was a bit much to tow, rig , launch & sail all
by myself.
http://sailquest.com/market/models/spipe.htm


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,239
Default WWP opinions?

On 2008-08-17 22:17:36 -0400, "txmxrider" said:

By appearances alone, the 15' West Wight Potter seems to have pretty
much everything we require and maybe even room for a portapotty for the
Admiral. They also rate high in the "cute" factor, which also appeals
to the Admiral. Anyone here familiar with these boats? I appreciate
your opinions both pro and con. For reference we would be sailing
almost exclusively on inland lakes in Texas with maybe an occasional
trip to the coast once we get some experience and if the boat is
capable of sailing in protected bays.


The WWP is an awfully cute boat, and a particularly appealing one for a
few reasons.

But I really recommend walking the docks and visiting the possible
boats in or near the target outlay for your specific purpose(s),

Small and mid-size boats are selling very cheaply these days as no one
wants a boat under 40' any more, and even the beginner's market has
dried up. A season or two ago, we helped sell a sistership at or below
$3.5k. I surveyed the boat and it was one I wouldn't hesitate to take
to the Caribbean for months or years at a time, though I'd have been
conservative on the initial sea trials, staying close enough to
"civilization" to limp in if something I hadn't inspected failed.

Don't get married to any particular boat until you've satisfied
yourself that it will adequately perform for the duties you'd like to
perform in the next 5-7 years. If you are only going to trail, that's
one audience. If you really want to go further, that's an entirely
different one.

--
Jere Lull
Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD
Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/
Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 5
Default WWP opinions?

Check out this forum,

http://bbs.trailersailor.com/forums/...ilor/index.cgi

It is specifically devoted to small trailer sailboats. There are
several WWP owners there.
There is even a specific WWP forum at http://bbs.trailersailor.com/forums/potter/index.cgi
, but most traffic is in the main forumn.

Todd

txmxrider wrote:
Hello,

You may remember me, I'm the newbie who was asking about a trailerable
sailboat a few weeks ago. We decided to go with a small, trailerable boat in
the 15'-17' range, nothing too 'athletic' because we're old farts, and
preferably something with sides and seats because our old butts aren't made
for hanging off the edge of a racer. We're looking for a smallish boat
because it seems like it would be easier for old farts (and possibly senile,
old farts) to assemble at the ramp. And also something easy for old, senile
farts to learn to sail. By appearances alone, the 15' West Wight Potter
seems to have pretty much everything we require and maybe even room for a
portapotty for the Admiral. They also rate high in the "cute" factor, which
also appeals to the Admiral. Anyone here familiar with these boats? I
appreciate your opinions both pro and con. For reference we would be sailing
almost exclusively on inland lakes in Texas with maybe an occasional trip to
the coast once we get some experience and if the boat is capable of sailing
in protected bays.

Thanks in advance for your valued opinions.

--
Everett
'04 KTM 300 EXC (Treefinder)
'75 Kawasaki S3 400 (2-stroke triple)
'74 BMW R90/6 (Gentleman's Express)

  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,244
Default WWP opinions?


"txmxrider" wrote in message
...
Hello,

You may remember me, I'm the newbie who was asking about a trailerable
sailboat a few weeks ago. We decided to go with a small, trailerable boat
in
the 15'-17' range, nothing too 'athletic' because we're old farts, and
preferably something with sides and seats because our old butts aren't
made
for hanging off the edge of a racer. We're looking for a smallish boat
because it seems like it would be easier for old farts (and possibly
senile,
old farts) to assemble at the ramp. And also something easy for old,
senile
farts to learn to sail. By appearances alone, the 15' West Wight Potter
seems to have pretty much everything we require and maybe even room for a
portapotty for the Admiral. They also rate high in the "cute" factor,
which
also appeals to the Admiral. Anyone here familiar with these boats? I
appreciate your opinions both pro and con. For reference we would be
sailing
almost exclusively on inland lakes in Texas with maybe an occasional trip
to
the coast once we get some experience and if the boat is capable of
sailing
in protected bays.

Thanks in advance for your valued opinions.




Good choice, Joe! Looks like you're finally taking my advice to heart and
getting something to sail that you might be able to keep afloat. But, is
there room in there for MsTerry and the pooch?

Wilbur Hubbard




  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
Default WWP opinions?


"txmxrider" wrote in message
...
Hello,

You may remember me, I'm the newbie who was asking about a trailerable
sailboat a few weeks ago. We decided to go with a small, trailerable boat
in
the 15'-17' range, nothing too 'athletic' because we're old farts, and
preferably something with sides and seats because our old butts aren't
made
for hanging off the edge of a racer. We're looking for a smallish boat
because it seems like it would be easier for old farts (and possibly
senile,
old farts) to assemble at the ramp. And also something easy for old,
senile
farts to learn to sail. By appearances alone, the 15' West Wight Potter
seems to have pretty much everything we require and maybe even room for a
portapotty for the Admiral. They also rate high in the "cute" factor,
which
also appeals to the Admiral. Anyone here familiar with these boats? I
appreciate your opinions both pro and con. For reference we would be
sailing
almost exclusively on inland lakes in Texas with maybe an occasional trip
to
the coast once we get some experience and if the boat is capable of
sailing
in protected bays.

Thanks in advance for your valued opinions.

--
Everett
'04 KTM 300 EXC (Treefinder)
'75 Kawasaki S3 400 (2-stroke triple)
'74 BMW R90/6 (Gentleman's Express)



The WWP 15 is actually 14'. It has a high center of force and is prone to
going on its side.. If you flip it or put it on its side it will fill with
water unless the cabin door is securely on. Tie down the swing keel, if you
put it on its side it will retract into the trunk and then you'll flip. Once
filled with water it will weigh several tons, you'll never get it out of the
water onto the beach or on a trailer. Don't believe the bull**** ads about
it floating high and dry with a 3 inch hole cut in it. It floats with the 2
inches of the cabin top out of the water. Boat wakes have flipped the pig
and people have drowned. Don't believe much of what the Potter folks say
when you bring these things up to them as they are a cult and any negative
(though constructive) criticism is taken as a threat. You'll hear "I been
sailing one for thirty years and that never happened to me" type of
responses.

If you are a skilled sailor the boat will handle unbelievably rough water
for its size and remain dry. Ditch the plastic cleats, get 2 large cockpit
drain holes and be able to pump/bail that cockpit out. Once it fills, you
are toast. The bunk cushions absorb water like a sponge. Don't accesorize
the daylights out of the thing, it's only a dinghy. Put a big inflatable
mattress under the lazarette and keep it inflated so all that volume doesn't
wind up getting filled with water when you lay it down and it goes under.
Don't believe the stuff about "self righting", and tie down that swing keel.

Otherwise it's a pretty good micro cruiser and lots of fun.

Buy a used one

Check out the Neptune 16 http://www.sailingtexas.com/sneptune16b.html it
will outsail the Potter hands down and has more room. Plus it actually self
rights when you lay it down.

Good luck!


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 477
Default WWP opinions?

"Popeye the Sailor" wrote
get 2 large cockpit drain holes


Where can one purchase such holes?


  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 2,587
Default WWP opinions?

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:46:48 -0400, "Ernest Scribbler"
wrote:

"Popeye the Sailor" wrote
get 2 large cockpit drain holes


Where can one purchase such holes?


Your local boatyard can creat them. [for big bucks, probably] You want
a door, hinged at the top that will open if pushed from the inside,
but not the outside. How big it needs to be is a question. I say make
them as big as will fit. The door goes on the outside and is bigger
than the hole. That way waves can't stress the hinge.

Casady
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 70
Default WWP opinions?

On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:17:36 -0500, txmxrider wrote:


Thanks in advance for your valued opinions.


I'd look at the Wayfarer. 16', designed to teach Royal Navy cadets how
to sail on the Solent, where the wind does blow. I cut my teeth on an
early wooden variant in the 60's. A great boat. Some owners kit them
out to sail/camp on them. I think Abbott in Sarnia, Ontario was the last
to produce them in fibreglass. I may be wrong about that...someone else
may have the license now...check it out.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 19
Default WWP opinions?

"txmxrider" wrote in message
...
Hello,

By appearances alone, the 15' West Wight Potter
seems to have pretty much everything we require and maybe even room for a
portapotty for the Admiral. They also rate high in the "cute" factor,
which
also appeals to the Admiral. Anyone here familiar with these boats? I
appreciate your opinions both pro and con. For reference we would be
sailing
almost exclusively on inland lakes in Texas with maybe an occasional trip
to
the coast once we get some experience and if the boat is capable of
sailing
in protected bays.


My parents bought one of the earliest WWP's new in about 1968. It was a fun
little boat and, as the designer demonstrated, remarkably seaworthy - he
sailed one from the UK to Norway, IIRC, and survived a force 9 gale.

As for space, my folks once did a 3 week cruise on the upper Thames with a
large labrador and a cat. I think Dad had ideas of writing a sequel to
'Three men in a boat' but the title 'Mum, Dad, a cat and a dog in a boat'
just didn't have the same ring to it! Oh, and yes they did have a PortaPotti
installed in the stern locker for use when the boom tent was up.

You could do a lot worse than a WWP and back in 1968 they were built with
very substantial spars for the tiny sails.

Good luck,
John.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any opinions? DSK General 1 March 21st 06 06:40 PM
Any opinions? JIMinFL General 0 March 21st 06 06:23 PM
Need your opinions *JimH* General 9 August 27th 05 08:50 AM
Opinions on Sea Ray 215 zeebop General 78 June 29th 05 01:44 AM
we need opinions Kaiser Yachting General 4 March 2nd 04 07:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017