Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Give it a few years. U. Florida has been studying shark and porpoise skin
for some time trying to produce a low friction non-depleting non-toxic anti-fouling coating for the Navy. Last I heard they were in full scale testing. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com "Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... I've been watching the olympic swimming and notice that nearly all of the swimmers wear the new performance swimming suits. I did a bit of research on the web and came up with the following quote from Speedo: The LZR-Race suits promise to have 5 percent less drag than Speedo's previous best FASTSKIN PRO suits that have helped break world records in the past year. Speedo also claims swimmers will have 5% better oxygen intake efficiency thanks to stronger core compression section along the abdomen area. I wonder whether this phenomena applies to boats? Should we be attaching shark skin to our boats? I have seen the dinghy sailors polishing the underwater surfaces of their dinghys with 2,000 grit sandpaper and wonder whether this might actually be the wrong thing to do. Is there any empirical information regarding the application of this technology to boats? Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:14:57 -0400, "Glenn Ashmore"
wrote: Give it a few years. U. Florida has been studying shark and porpoise skin for some time trying to produce a low friction non-depleting non-toxic anti-fouling coating for the Navy. Last I heard they were in full scale testing. I was under the impression that anti fouling paint, or copper sheets for that matter, work only because they are toxic. Casady |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 11:46*am, (Richard Casady)
wrote: On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:14:57 -0400, "Glenn Ashmore" wrote: Give it a few years. *U. Florida has been studying shark and porpoise skin for some time trying to produce a low friction non-depleting non-toxic anti-fouling coating for the Navy. * Last I heard they were in full scale testing. I was under the impression that anti fouling paint, or copper sheets for that matter, work only because they are toxic. Casady Thats true, unless you can find a new material that will not allow anything to stick. Ever see a barney on a shark? There were some "Snake Skin" coatings that were rolled on in 6 layers. Once anything stuck the friction would make the paint layer shed. Ok but major hassel to apply right. Fred |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Give it a few years. U. Florida has been studying shark and porpoise skin for some time trying to produce a low friction non-depleting non-toxic anti-fouling coating for the Navy. Last I heard they were in full scale testing. I was under the impression that anti fouling paint, or copper sheets for that matter, work only because they are toxic. It has something to do with the texture and flexibility. It is apparently a thick coating that has a microscopic surface pattern that slime spores and barnacles have a hard time binding to. It also flexes slightly under varying water pressure so the barnacle cement pops off. A side benefit is that those little bumps improve laminar flow reducing wetted surface drag. Sort of like the dimples on a golf ball. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Glenn Ashmore" writes:
It has something to do with the texture and flexibility. It is apparently a thick coating that has a microscopic surface pattern that slime spores and barnacles have a hard time binding to. It also flexes slightly under varying water pressure so the barnacle cement pops off. A side benefit is that those little bumps improve laminar flow reducing wetted surface drag. Sort of like the dimples on a golf ball. It is the other way around actually. The dimples of golf balls are there to trip the boundary layer to make sure you get rid of the laminar boundary layer. -- Martin Schöön "Problems worthy of attack show their worth by hitting back." Piet Hein |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Underwater surface finish | Boat Building | |||
Anybody using a underwater camera.. | General | |||
Is it possible to sail underwater??? | General | |||
Bristol Finish ,, two part finish question | Cruising | |||
Underwater sails? | Boat Building |