Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Give it a few years. U. Florida has been studying shark and porpoise skin for some time trying to produce a low friction non-depleting non-toxic anti-fouling coating for the Navy. Last I heard they were in full scale testing. I was under the impression that anti fouling paint, or copper sheets for that matter, work only because they are toxic. It has something to do with the texture and flexibility. It is apparently a thick coating that has a microscopic surface pattern that slime spores and barnacles have a hard time binding to. It also flexes slightly under varying water pressure so the barnacle cement pops off. A side benefit is that those little bumps improve laminar flow reducing wetted surface drag. Sort of like the dimples on a golf ball. -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Glenn Ashmore" writes:
It has something to do with the texture and flexibility. It is apparently a thick coating that has a microscopic surface pattern that slime spores and barnacles have a hard time binding to. It also flexes slightly under varying water pressure so the barnacle cement pops off. A side benefit is that those little bumps improve laminar flow reducing wetted surface drag. Sort of like the dimples on a golf ball. It is the other way around actually. The dimples of golf balls are there to trip the boundary layer to make sure you get rid of the laminar boundary layer. -- Martin Schöön "Problems worthy of attack show their worth by hitting back." Piet Hein |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:38:29 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote: ...Should we be attaching shark skin to our boats? I have seen the dinghy sailors polishing the underwater surfaces of their dinghys with 2,000 grit sandpaper and wonder whether this might actually be the wrong thing to do. Is there any empirical information regarding the application of this technology to boats? Bruce-in-Bangkok Slime has been used successfully as a hull coat. It's a consumable though. There have been experimental hulls with clse spaced chines - getting them right is quite a trick. And finally, there have been air-blown hulls..... Brian W |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’ve been using this technique on my boats bottom for years. The
doubting Thomases in the boat yard assumed that it was because I was just too bone idle to prepare the surface properly and that my painting technique was lousy. But I knew better. Still haven’t got it quite right though, a few more lumps this year and she should go like greased lightning. Mike. I wonder whether this phenomena applies to boats? Should we be attaching shark skin to our boats? I have seen the dinghy sailors polishing the underwater surfaces of their dinghys with 2,000 grit sandpaper and wonder whether this might actually be the wrong thing to do. Is there any empirical information regarding the application of this technology to boats? Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:38:29 +0700, in message
Bruce in Bangkok wrote: I wonder whether this phenomena applies to boats? Should we be attaching shark skin to our boats? I have seen the dinghy sailors polishing the underwater surfaces of their dinghys with 2,000 grit sandpaper and wonder whether this might actually be the wrong thing to do. Is there any empirical information regarding the application of this technology to boats? The orientation of the surface is very important in determining whether drag is reduced or increased, thus the effect is much easier to manage on submerged bodies like sharks or aircraft, rather than surface craft like sailboats that are subject to varying flow directions due to wave action, heel angle, etc. The effect is real. The major problem in application so far has been that the surfaces are fragile and easily damaged by things like slings, collision with minor debris, etc. It's not worth it outside racing, and the RRS prohibit it. Ryk |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.building,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I dunno bout all dat fancy schmancy stuff what youse guys is huffin' bout,
but its pretty common knowledge that in high speed stuff like the racing pad on the bottom of a modern bass boat, an ultra smooth waxed finish is not as fast as a scuffed finish. Of course us psychotic bass boat drivers don't get much chance to compare around here. One run up the river, and you skip two or three sandbars giving that pad a nicely scuffed finish. They always seem to be faster coming back down river. LOL. Bob La Londe www.YumaBassMan.com |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Underwater surface finish | Boat Building | |||
Anybody using a underwater camera.. | General | |||
Is it possible to sail underwater??? | General | |||
Bristol Finish ,, two part finish question | Cruising | |||
Underwater sails? | Boat Building |