Piracy map
Here's a useful bit of information for cruise planning:
Piracy map: http://www.icc-ccs.org/extra/display.php Please note that there were no attacks in Maine:) -- Roger Long |
Piracy map
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:20:21 -0400, "Roger Long"
wrote: Here's a useful bit of information for cruise planning: Piracy map: http://www.icc-ccs.org/extra/display.php Please note that there were no attacks in Maine:) Mainiacs got the summer trade to pillage :-) Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Piracy map
"Roger Long" wrote in news:g6av74$fct$1
@registered.motzarella.org: Here's a useful bit of information for cruise planning: On Jul 25, 6:20 am, "Roger Long" wrote: Here's a useful bit of information for cruise planning: With the exception of the reports of piracy against yachts in S America, I'm unclear as to how useful your information is for cruise planning, Roger. Two points: 1) Official piracy against yachts. The ICC page to which you linked says zero about the government-run piracy against yachts that occurs in Australia, for example, where foreign cruisers have been financially ruined by 'legal' action by government agencies. Cruisers have been told, for instance, by Australian officials in New Caledonia that they need only to advise Australian officials 48 hours before arrival but then, on arrival, they have been prosecuted and ruined for not giving 96 hours notice. See http://www.thecoastalpassage.com.au/manzaris.html 2) Poor correlation between piracy against cargo vessels and acts against private yachts. In the case of Southeast Asia and the Malacca Straits in particular, many cruisers have heard stories about piracy (piracy against cargo ships definitely takes place in the Malacca Straits: some of it is just opportunistic theft, other cases are of inside jobs - ie within a shipping company - to steal high value cargo). But there have been only two cases of piracy against cruisers in SE Asia in a decade, and only one of those was well substantiated (the other seems to have been a case where the owner of a vessel wanted to claim against insurance). Cruisers and their yachts are liable to opportunistic theft in SE Asia (if you leave your Rolex watch on deck, don't expect it to be there when you come back), but genuine piracy is v low on the list of risks (lightning strike is higher). Cheers Bil |
Piracy map
"Bil Hansen" wrote
I'm unclear as to how useful your information is for cruise planning, It was a tongue in cheek post set up for the comment about Maine. Your point about OZ is interesting though. Back when I was in aviation the world flying community was following with dismay the destruction of Australia's general aviation system and a healthy outback flying tourist trade. For decades I heard what a great and family friendly country it is (aside from the fact that anything that moves is poisonous and can kill you) and now all I seem to hear is stuff like this. What is going on down under? I can understand though how quickly a nation can slip into madness. Just look at the US. Boaters dodged a bullet last week. $32,500.00 fines for using dish detergent or hosing off your deck would be right in line with what you report from OZ. If it had passed, it probably would have been enforced against visiting yachts because they don't vote. -- Roger Long |
Piracy map
"Roger Long" wrote in message ... Here's a useful bit of information for cruise planning: Piracy map: http://www.icc-ccs.org/extra/display.php Please note that there were no attacks in Maine:) -- Roger Long ================================================== ============== Jolly Roger.. ye left out de old Maine pirate .. Captain Marina Cap'n Marina don't need no cutless, no gun, .. he is the worst type of pirate, a thieving, lying, scab on society waiting for unsuspecting sailboats to come looking for a mooring.. Arrrrgh... "So, yer wantn a mooring are ya" .. Cap'n Marina says. "Oh, yes, you see John must be at a meeting in Boston and because of the weather and Sally's braces, we would like to leave our cruising sailboat for a few days at your marina". "Cap'n Marina to Paul, in the mooring/fuel dock booth" .. "wake up Paul " .. "put down the Playboy". "Yes, Cap'n, this is Paul". "I be sending a 35' boat toward the dock, make sure you empty it of all swag, tell the owner he must fill up with fuel or no water,, and charge him $7 per gallon for the fuel... oh, and put the boat out near the sea gull nest so the birds can **** on it .. and tell the owner that due to the weather,, there is an extra add on for the mooring of $50 per night ,, which is called the Maine Weather Mooring Supplement .. and when the owner isn't looking .. put his dinghy under the dock over where the tide will rise and fall 9' so it will be crushed on the next flood/ebb .. and we can sell him one of our Chinese made looks like a Zodiac inflatables .. and if he needs a ride, call my brother over at Charley's Tavern and tell him to pick these poor unfortunate fools up and bring them to the bus station ... tell my brother to charge them $100 dollars and tell him to return $50 to me ... " "Paul,, Cap'n Marina again .." "Yes, Cap'n".. "Will you be staying for the whole month of August, or are you heading back to Harvard to continue studying how to be a lawyer and screwing everyone in society"? "Paul Paul .. you down there" ? == meanwhile at the dock .. Sally, the young girl with braces is smiling at Paul, the future lawyer .. "Paaauuuuullllll ,, can't you take us to the bus station and help daddy with his boat"? == "Cap'n Marina,, this is Paul,, I'm on my cell ..... I quit".. "you can take your marina and shove it" === Even pirates have bad days.. |
Piracy map
"Roger Long" wrote in news:g6av74$fct$1
@registered.motzarella.org: Here's a useful bit of information for cruise planning: Piracy map: http://www.icc-ccs.org/extra/display.php Please note that there were no attacks in Maine:) Waitaminit! This map is bogus! NONE of the marinas or boatyards around here are listed on it!....(c; |
Piracy map
Hello Roger,
well in the US there is a ruling almost as bad and ONLY against foreign visiting yacht, a ruling that lets you think you ended up in North Vietnam, China or Russia at cold war days, but it is newly implemented by Homeland Security. US-yachts in Europe are entitled for a 18 months stay, the skipper secured a Schengen Visa and is free to move within all Schengen treaty countries, generally speaking, that is entire EU without GB (not exactly, but from a sailors view) A EU-registered yacht visiting US must report in advance, undergo a security screening that let's you feel being a criminal AND - and this is the point - must report at every harbor master wherever she wants to anchor or dock en route. Even when staying in the same area, every movement must be reported in advance, the fines are more than heavy, I read US$ 5.000 for the first offense, doubling for the next. http://www.noonsite.com/Members/doina/R2008-02-07-1 Many EU-yachts do not take the risk and burden and wait for better days. I wanted to sail round Pacific next year, starting Far East, but wasting so much time with daily reports keeps me away, despite many friends waiting in Southern California. Seems Osama Bin Laden has won, US is frightened to death, I am sorry to say. Henry On Jul 25, 7:08*pm, "Roger Long" wrote: "Bil Hansen" wrote ........*If it had passed, it probably would have been enforced against visiting yachts because they don't vote. -- Roger Long |
Piracy map
blubaju wrote:
Hello Roger, well in the US there is a ruling almost as bad and ONLY against foreign visiting yacht, a ruling that lets you think you ended up in North Vietnam, China or Russia at cold war days, but it is newly implemented by Homeland Security. US-yachts in Europe are entitled for a 18 months stay, the skipper secured a Schengen Visa and is free to move within all Schengen treaty countries, generally speaking, that is entire EU without GB (not exactly, but from a sailors view) A EU-registered yacht visiting US must report in advance, undergo a security screening that let's you feel being a criminal AND - and this is the point - must report at every harbor master wherever she wants to anchor or dock en route. Even when staying in the same area, every movement must be reported in advance, the fines are more than heavy, I read US$ 5.000 for the first offense, doubling for the next. http://www.noonsite.com/Members/doina/R2008-02-07-1 Many EU-yachts do not take the risk and burden and wait for better days. I wanted to sail round Pacific next year, starting Far East, but wasting so much time with daily reports keeps me away, despite many friends waiting in Southern California. Seems Osama Bin Laden has won, US is frightened to death, I am sorry to say. Henry I go to the CBP website and find none of the above. Things are the same as always. Coming from out of country, you phone customs and they meet you at a port of entry. They ask a few questions, look at your papers, and clear you thru. You are then free to go where you please and only have to report again if you leave the country and then return. Same as always. Had a Japanese gentleman arrive in Port Angeles the other day and he was cleared in about 15 minutes. Took him 51 days to get here from Japan. Gordon |
Piracy map
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:19:35 -0700, Gordon wrote:
blubaju wrote: Hello Roger, well in the US there is a ruling almost as bad and ONLY against foreign visiting yacht, a ruling that lets you think you ended up in North Vietnam, China or Russia at cold war days, but it is newly implemented by Homeland Security. US-yachts in Europe are entitled for a 18 months stay, the skipper secured a Schengen Visa and is free to move within all Schengen treaty countries, generally speaking, that is entire EU without GB (not exactly, but from a sailors view) A EU-registered yacht visiting US must report in advance, undergo a security screening that let's you feel being a criminal AND - and this is the point - must report at every harbor master wherever she wants to anchor or dock en route. Even when staying in the same area, every movement must be reported in advance, the fines are more than heavy, I read US$ 5.000 for the first offense, doubling for the next. http://www.noonsite.com/Members/doina/R2008-02-07-1 Many EU-yachts do not take the risk and burden and wait for better days. I wanted to sail round Pacific next year, starting Far East, but wasting so much time with daily reports keeps me away, despite many friends waiting in Southern California. Seems Osama Bin Laden has won, US is frightened to death, I am sorry to say. Henry I go to the CBP website and find none of the above. Things are the same as always. Coming from out of country, you phone customs and they meet you at a port of entry. They ask a few questions, look at your papers, and clear you thru. You are then free to go where you please and only have to report again if you leave the country and then return. Same as always. Had a Japanese gentleman arrive in Port Angeles the other day and he was cleared in about 15 minutes. Took him 51 days to get here from Japan. Gordon From: http://www.fort-lauderdale-marine-di...cgadvisory.php USCG To Enforce Advance Notice of Arrival Regulations U.S. Coast Guard Public Advisory Update UPDATE: On 5/26/2004 we received this update from Frank Herhold: Conversations with the USCG subsequent to the May 21, 2004 bulletin have revealed additional information regarding the 96-Hour Advance Notice of Arrival (ANOA) regulation. The regulation, adopted in February 28, 2003, includes a correction made by the USCG. The correction was included in the Federal Register on November 10, 2003 and amended the regulation to clarify exempt vessels. We are pleased to announce that U.S. recreational vessels are exempt from the ANOA requirements. Envirocare and MIASF received final confirmation this morning from Captain of the Port Jim Watson that ALL US flagged recreational vessels are exempt from the Notice of Arrival requirements. The site goes on to describe in detail the regulations that apply to foreign vessels entering US waters and the advance notice, etc., required. Has this changed? Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Piracy map
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:19:12 -0700 (PDT), blubaju
wrote: Hello Roger, well in the US there is a ruling almost as bad and ONLY against foreign visiting yacht, a ruling that lets you think you ended up in North Vietnam, China or Russia at cold war days, but it is newly implemented by Homeland Security. US-yachts in Europe are entitled for a 18 months stay, the skipper secured a Schengen Visa and is free to move within all Schengen treaty countries, generally speaking, that is entire EU without GB (not exactly, but from a sailors view) A EU-registered yacht visiting US must report in advance, undergo a security screening that let's you feel being a criminal AND - and this is the point - must report at every harbor master wherever she wants to anchor or dock en route. Even when staying in the same area, every movement must be reported in advance, the fines are more than heavy, I read US$ 5.000 for the first offense, doubling for the next. http://www.noonsite.com/Members/doina/R2008-02-07-1 Many EU-yachts do not take the risk and burden and wait for better days. I wanted to sail round Pacific next year, starting Far East, but wasting so much time with daily reports keeps me away, despite many friends waiting in Southern California. Seems Osama Bin Laden has won, US is frightened to death, I am sorry to say. Henry On Jul 25, 7:08*pm, "Roger Long" wrote: "Bil Hansen" wrote ........*If it had passed, it probably would have been enforced against visiting yachts because they don't vote. -- Roger Long Agreed!! We spent time and money obtaining 10 year US visas in Madrid before we found out about the restrictions. One of our dreams was to sail up the east coast of the US and explore. The regulations and restrictions as well as the potential stress of being treated like a suspected criminal changed our plans entirely. cheers Peter |
Piracy map
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:19:35 -0700, Gordon wrote:
Many EU-yachts do not take the risk and burden and wait for better days. I wanted to sail round Pacific next year, starting Far East, but wasting so much time with daily reports keeps me away, despite many friends waiting in Southern California. Seems Osama Bin Laden has won, US is frightened to death, I am sorry to say. Henry I go to the CBP website and find none of the above. Things are the same as always. Coming from out of country, you phone customs and they meet you at a port of entry. They ask a few questions, look at your papers, and clear you thru. You are then free to go where you please and only have to report again if you leave the country and then return. Same as always. Had a Japanese gentleman arrive in Port Angeles the other day and he was cleared in about 15 minutes. Took him 51 days to get here from Japan. Gordon Gordon, I am sorry but you are definitely mistaken. regards Peter |
Piracy map
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:05:51 +1000, Herodotus
wrote: On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:19:12 -0700 (PDT), blubaju wrote: Hello Roger, well in the US there is a ruling almost as bad and ONLY against foreign visiting yacht, a ruling that lets you think you ended up in North Vietnam, China or Russia at cold war days, but it is newly implemented by Homeland Security. US-yachts in Europe are entitled for a 18 months stay, the skipper secured a Schengen Visa and is free to move within all Schengen treaty countries, generally speaking, that is entire EU without GB (not exactly, but from a sailors view) A EU-registered yacht visiting US must report in advance, undergo a security screening that let's you feel being a criminal AND - and this is the point - must report at every harbor master wherever she wants to anchor or dock en route. Even when staying in the same area, every movement must be reported in advance, the fines are more than heavy, I read US$ 5.000 for the first offense, doubling for the next. http://www.noonsite.com/Members/doina/R2008-02-07-1 Many EU-yachts do not take the risk and burden and wait for better days. I wanted to sail round Pacific next year, starting Far East, but wasting so much time with daily reports keeps me away, despite many friends waiting in Southern California. Seems Osama Bin Laden has won, US is frightened to death, I am sorry to say. Henry On Jul 25, 7:08*pm, "Roger Long" wrote: "Bil Hansen" wrote ........*If it had passed, it probably would have been enforced against visiting yachts because they don't vote. -- Roger Long Agreed!! We spent time and money obtaining 10 year US visas in Madrid before we found out about the restrictions. One of our dreams was to sail up the east coast of the US and explore. The regulations and restrictions as well as the potential stress of being treated like a suspected criminal changed our plans entirely. cheers Peter What's this "we"? Got a mouse in your pocket? All along it has been "I", "I", "I", stories about alarms to wake up the solitary sailor, etc., and now it is "we". What is going on here? Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Piracy map
On Jul 30, 5:19*am, Gordon wrote:
* *I go to the CBP website and find none of the above. Things are the same as always. Coming from out of country, you phone customs and they meet you at a port of entry. They ask a few questions, look at your papers, and clear you thru. You are then free to go where you please and only have to report again if you leave the country and then return. Same as always. * *Had a Japanese gentleman arrive in Port Angeles the other day and he was cleared in about 15 minutes. Took him 51 days to get here from Japan. * Gordon read he http://www.the-triton.com/megayachtn...x.php?news=827 then he http://law.justia.com/us/codes/title19/19usc1433.html TITLE 19--CUSTOMS DUTIES CHAPTER 4--TARIFF ACT OF 1930 SUBTITLE III--ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS Part II--Report, Entry, and Unlading of Vessels and Vehicles Sec. 1433. Report of arrival of vessels, vehicles, and aircraft (a) Vessel arrival (1) Immediately upon the arrival at any port or place within the United States or the Virgin Islands of-- (A) any vessel from a foreign port or place; (B) any foreign vessel from a domestic port; (C) any vessel of the United States carrying foreign merchandise for which entry has not been made; or (D) any vessel which has visited a hovering vessel or received merchandise while outside the territorial sea; the master of the vessel shall report the arrival at the nearest customs facility or such other place as the Secretary may prescribe by regulations. ..... Its he (B) any FOREIGN vessel from a DOMESTIC port; though the original law is from 1930 it is still in use! Maybe in some areas the officers have much to do and do not care, but the law is here! The annoying is not the custom clearance, sailing around the world you encounter everything, from a few minutes to 2 days, but as a foreign vessel I MUST report every movement in US, though it might only be a phone call, I might overlook it in bad weather, lucky, I do not drink, but when sick? the officer might forget to write it down, sorry this is my own paranoia, bureaucrats in the whole world never make mistakes, I know, but the fines are just to high, I am not taking that risk. My dream was coming down the West coast, passing Panama, then following the American Great Loop ( http://www.greatloop.com ) going up the ICWW, N.Y., Great Lakes then down to New Orleans. Have more family and friends is US than in Europe, would take more than 2 years, but must be done in 2x1year or import taxes and duties are to be paid. But at a reporting scheme as in former Russia or China just scares me. What happened to a former free country? Why they treat all visitors the same? Oh not true, I am still lucky to belong to those 30 countries which are better off, we pay less and only need to call, the rest of the world must report personally. My cruising kitty has no allowance for this risk, there is something to replace/repair all the time anyway. And US yachts are free to roam in EU waters. Henry P.S. if anyone can PROOF that my information is wrong, please let me know, I'd really like to make that trip |
Piracy map
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:38:41 -0700 (PDT), in message
blubaju wrote: P.S. if anyone can PROOF that my information is wrong, please let me know, I'd really like to make that trip I can't prove it, however the practice locally is different. Canadian cruisers in Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence can check in once, with no advance notice, and roam from port to port without objections from Customs. However, they seem to be in the habit of changing the rules often since 9/11. IME the best way to get an answer on current practice is to contact a person in the port where you plan to enter. Ryk |
Piracy map
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:23:37 -0400, Ryk
wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:38:41 -0700 (PDT), in message blubaju wrote: P.S. if anyone can PROOF that my information is wrong, please let me know, I'd really like to make that trip I can't prove it, however the practice locally is different. Canadian cruisers in Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence can check in once, with no advance notice, and roam from port to port without objections from Customs. However, they seem to be in the habit of changing the rules often since 9/11. IME the best way to get an answer on current practice is to contact a person in the port where you plan to enter. Ryk Good Lord, sounds just like Thailand ... whatever the current officer decides and likely to change without notice. And people ask me, "aren't you ever going back?" Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Piracy map
We spent time and money obtaining 10 year US visas in Madrid before we found out about the restrictions. One of our dreams was to sail up the east coast of the US and explore. The regulations and restrictions as well as the potential stress of being treated like a suspected criminal changed our plans entirely. cheers Peter What's this "we"? Got a mouse in your pocket? All along it has been "I", "I", "I", stories about alarms to wake up the solitary sailor, etc., and now it is "we". What is going on here? Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) The "We" is me, my wife and son who sailed from New Zealand to Spain. "We" got the visas before we decided that he and her go back to Sydney for his schooling. "I" have sailed it since then. Quite simple really. I should admit that I have not really sailed solo as I have my best friend Sean (pronounced correctly as "shorn") with me. He is a great comfort at all times. He only stands about 6 inches when he is standing on all fours and needs his battery changing sometimes. He is only a stuffed toy sheep but has a great personality and eats anything I give him, even American Airlines filled rolls. Peter |
Piracy map
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:43:35 +1000, Herodotus
wrote: We spent time and money obtaining 10 year US visas in Madrid before we found out about the restrictions. One of our dreams was to sail up the east coast of the US and explore. The regulations and restrictions as well as the potential stress of being treated like a suspected criminal changed our plans entirely. cheers Peter What's this "we"? Got a mouse in your pocket? All along it has been "I", "I", "I", stories about alarms to wake up the solitary sailor, etc., and now it is "we". What is going on here? Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) The "We" is me, my wife and son who sailed from New Zealand to Spain. "We" got the visas before we decided that he and her go back to Sydney for his schooling. "I" have sailed it since then. Quite simple really. I should admit that I have not really sailed solo as I have my best friend Sean (pronounced correctly as "shorn") with me. He is a great comfort at all times. He only stands about 6 inches when he is standing on all fours and needs his battery changing sometimes. He is only a stuffed toy sheep but has a great personality and eats anything I give him, even American Airlines filled rolls. Peter Gorry but that's a classic... a bloke from New Zealand with a pet sheep... Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Piracy map
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:08:40 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote: Quite simple really. I should admit that I have not really sailed solo as I have my best friend Sean (pronounced correctly as "shorn") with me. He is a great comfort at all times. He only stands about 6 inches when he is standing on all fours and needs his battery changing sometimes. He is only a stuffed toy sheep but has a great personality and eats anything I give him, even American Airlines filled rolls. Peter Gorry but that's a classic... a bloke from New Zealand with a pet sheep... Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) Well, we may have a special relationship with some of our 65 million sheep but at least we don't have a classic song "Tie me kangaroo down sport" - the old one by Rolf Harris. The mind boggles rather politely when one wonders as to just why the Australians need to tie down their kangaroos. Also, I do recall from university days that Kinsey stated that 65% of American farm boys have had at least one sexual relationship with a farm animal. Didn't you and Larry come from farming families? Yes, I do acknowledge that Kinsey and his report have been somewhat discredited but this is all the ammunition I have. cheers Peter |
Piracy map
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:19:45 +1000, Herodotus
wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:08:40 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: Quite simple really. I should admit that I have not really sailed solo as I have my best friend Sean (pronounced correctly as "shorn") with me. He is a great comfort at all times. He only stands about 6 inches when he is standing on all fours and needs his battery changing sometimes. He is only a stuffed toy sheep but has a great personality and eats anything I give him, even American Airlines filled rolls. Peter Gorry but that's a classic... a bloke from New Zealand with a pet sheep... Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) Well, we may have a special relationship with some of our 65 million sheep but at least we don't have a classic song "Tie me kangaroo down sport" - the old one by Rolf Harris. 65 million sheep and 4,270,392 people as at Thursday, 31 July 2008 at 6:39:07 p.m. The mind boggles rather politely when one wonders as to just why the Australians need to tie down their kangaroos. I suppose because sheep, albeit the younger ones, are sort of cuddley creatures, but kangaroos????? Mary had a little lamb, she also had a bear. Everybody saw her lamb but no one saw her..... Also, I do recall from university days that Kinsey stated that 65% of American farm boys have had at least one sexual relationship with a farm animal. Rather, 65% admitted it...... Didn't you and Larry come from farming families? Don't know about Larry buy my old man was a postman.... Yes, I do acknowledge that Kinsey and his report have been somewhat discredited but this is all the ammunition I have. cheers Peter Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Piracy map
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:46:03 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok
wrote: Also, I do recall from university days that Kinsey stated that 65% of American farm boys have had at least one sexual relationship with a farm animal. Rather, 65% admitted it...... Didn't you and Larry come from farming families? Don't know about Larry buy my old man was a postman.... So I guess that you missed out on a lot of good ol' boy fun? Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Piracy map
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:56:59 +1000, Herodotus
wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:46:03 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: Also, I do recall from university days that Kinsey stated that 65% of American farm boys have had at least one sexual relationship with a farm animal. Rather, 65% admitted it...... Didn't you and Larry come from farming families? Don't know about Larry buy my old man was a postman.... So I guess that you missed out on a lot of good ol' boy fun? Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) I'm going to have to educate you. We don't have "good old boys" in New Hampshire, or at least we didn't when I was there. Talk to Larry about them sort of folks. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom) |
Piracy map
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:29:36 +0700, in message
Bruce in Bangkok wrote: Good Lord, sounds just like Thailand ... whatever the current officer decides and likely to change without notice. I meant it more like the bureaucrats who run the web site may well be behind in their updates, but the front line officers can tell you the current rules. All of my dealings with border crossings have been handled professionally on both US and Canadian sides. They have no sense of humour, but I have never had any sense that they were making their own rules. Ryk |
Piracy map
All of my dealings with border crossings have been
handled professionally on both US and Canadian sides. They have no sense of humour, but I have never had any sense that they were making their own rules. Perhaps what we are actually seeing is the folks in places with real ports telling the homeland security folks the bugger off and handling port arrivals the way they are supposed to be handled. I also noted that folks in clean white boats with SS anchors are exempt. If the next round of (us) law is implemented you may be subject to search at each and every port of call; to save us from those dratted al keida commercial fishermen no doubt. Again no doubt a clean white boat will get you a free pass. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com