![]() |
Proposed Discharge Permits
New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this
could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. On September 30th, the EPA is scheduled to begin court-ordered enforcement of the Clean Water Act that controls all water discharged from boats during its normal operation. Recreational boaters had been exempt from it for 34 years because it was meant for large, ocean-going ships. Now, to comply with the law, the EPA has proposed permits for boaters; the permits are free and automatic. The EPA says boaters will be required to take "simple steps" to control water discharge from their boats, but didn't give me any details about how to do that. |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"claus" wrote in message . .. New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. On September 30th, the EPA is scheduled to begin court-ordered enforcement of the Clean Water Act that controls all water discharged from boats during its normal operation. Recreational boaters had been exempt from it for 34 years because it was meant for large, ocean-going ships. Now, to comply with the law, the EPA has proposed permits for boaters; the permits are free and automatic. The EPA says boaters will be required to take "simple steps" to control water discharge from their boats, but didn't give me any details about how to do that. For more info, click this link: http://www.boatus.com/gov/documents/EPAPERMIT.pdf |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"claus" wrote in message
. .. New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. On September 30th, the EPA is scheduled to begin court-ordered enforcement of the Clean Water Act that controls all water discharged from boats during its normal operation. Recreational boaters had been exempt from it for 34 years because it was meant for large, ocean-going ships. Now, to comply with the law, the EPA has proposed permits for boaters; the permits are free and automatic. The EPA says boaters will be required to take "simple steps" to control water discharge from their boats, but didn't give me any details about how to do that. In some ways, this is similar to DHS' TWIC card requirements. If you've got a CG license and use it, you're required by law to get a card for $132. They can't/won't enforce it unless you're stopped while working and asked to produce it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Proposed Discharge Permits
On Jul 19, 5:21*pm, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"claus" wrote in message . .. New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. On September 30th, the EPA is scheduled to begin court-ordered enforcement of the Clean Water Act that controls all water discharged from boats during its normal operation. Recreational boaters had been exempt from it for 34 years because it was meant for large, ocean-going ships. Now, to comply with the law, the EPA has proposed permits for boaters; the permits are free and automatic. The EPA says boaters will be required to take "simple steps" to control water discharge from their boats, but didn't give me any details about how to do that. In some ways, this is similar to DHS' TWIC card requirements. If you've got a CG license and use it, you're required by law to get a card for $132. They can't/won't enforce it unless you're stopped while working and asked to produce it. -- "j" ganz Ah yes, the wonderful transportation Worker ID Card..... Lets see to get a MMD, Rate, or License you get to: have background check, fingerprinted, photographed, letters of recomendation.. Now to get a TWIC AFTER you have the MMD, Rate, License. you will need to: get ANOTHER background check, get finger printed AGAIN, and ANOTHER foto. Thank the Republicans and their public relations campaign that says NO big govenment and NO taxes.... Im a Democrate and now days consider myself a consevative! Bob |
Proposed Discharge Permits
On Jul 19, 4:30*pm, "claus" wrote:
New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. On September 30th, the EPA is scheduled to begin court-ordered enforcement of the Clean Water Act that controls all water discharged from boats during its normal operation. Recreational boaters had been exempt from it for 34 years because it was meant for large, ocean-going ships. Now, to comply with the law, the EPA has proposed permits for boaters; the permits are free and automatic. The EPA says boaters will be required to take "simple steps" to control water discharge from their boats, but didn't give me any details about how to do that. Dear Santa Clause: I read the link about the new EPA "MARPOL" regs.... Im already compliant. Its just good seamnaship. So what is the big deal? Bob |
Proposed Discharge Permits
The EPA has some new regs about private craft discharging bilge water... any
bilge water vs. what MARPOL says. It's another boondoggle. "Bob" wrote in message ... On Jul 19, 4:30 pm, "claus" wrote: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. On September 30th, the EPA is scheduled to begin court-ordered enforcement of the Clean Water Act that controls all water discharged from boats during its normal operation. Recreational boaters had been exempt from it for 34 years because it was meant for large, ocean-going ships. Now, to comply with the law, the EPA has proposed permits for boaters; the permits are free and automatic. The EPA says boaters will be required to take "simple steps" to control water discharge from their boats, but didn't give me any details about how to do that. Dear Santa Clause: I read the link about the new EPA "MARPOL" regs.... Im already compliant. Its just good seamnaship. So what is the big deal? Bob -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Proposed Discharge Permits
I just ran across another wrinkle in this situation today that requires some
local action. It's Real ID all over again. If your appropriate state agency fails to send a letter to the EPA in Washington accepting the blanket permit that is being issued and recongnizing Washington's authority then the blanket permit does not apply to vessels in that state. I called Inland Fisheries and Wildlife which handles boat registrations here in the land of pointed firs and was told that they didn't know anything about it and would transfer me over to the state DEP since it was clearly their problem. State DEP knew nothing about it and said they would have to transfer me over to Inland Fisheries and Wildlife since it was clearly in their jurisdiction. I have a phone message and email into a legislative liason person whose name I was given but no response yet. If your state drops the ball on sending the necessary letter of tribute and submission to Washington, all recreational vessels with that state registration will be illegal simply for being in the water after September 30. You might want to ask what your state is doing. -- Roger Long |
Proposed Discharge Permits
I am personally getting tired of this government debacle. I will do
absolutely nothing about getting this permit even if turns out this thing doesn't get over turned by Sept 30. I highly doubt the EPA will be at any of the boat ramps I launch from to check if I have it or not. if my own state can get the story straight who is responsible for enforcement I doubt very much they will enforce it. Our government at it's finest. |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Paul" wrote in message
... I am personally getting tired of this government debacle. I will do absolutely nothing about getting this permit even if turns out this thing doesn't get over turned by Sept 30. I highly doubt the EPA will be at any of the boat ramps I launch from to check if I have it or not. if my own state can get the story straight who is responsible for enforcement I doubt very much they will enforce it. Our government at it's finest. It will likely die a quiet death. It's unenforceable. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Capt. JG" wrote in message easolutions... "Paul" wrote in message ... I am personally getting tired of this government debacle. I will do absolutely nothing about getting this permit even if turns out this thing doesn't get over turned by Sept 30. I highly doubt the EPA will be at any of the boat ramps I launch from to check if I have it or not. if my own state can get the story straight who is responsible for enforcement I doubt very much they will enforce it. Our government at it's finest. It will likely die a quiet death. It's unenforceable. It could be turned into a jobs program. Think of all those good paying jobs for enforcement personnel and how good it would be for the economy. |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:32:09 -0700, "claus" said: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. BoatUS is playing it for all the PR it's worth, but anyone with modest ability to read and think should realize that what the EPA has done by providing "automatic" and free licenses is to abolish any requirement for a license for vessels under 79 feet. Not necessarily so. One can just as well read it as these "automatic and free licenses" still carry certain obligations. The question is can one REJECT these licenses and remain unencumbered? Or better yet does the license have standing if it is automatic and free? Wilbur Hubbard |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Capt. JG" wrote in
easolutions: Dear Santa Clause: I read the link about the new EPA "MARPOL" regs.... Im already compliant. Its just good seamnaship. So what is the big deal? Can we still **** over the side of the floating docks if that lady that always screams and reports us to the office isn't looking and we're not ****ing on someone's overpriced gelcoat? How about in our dingies hanging it out to LEEWARD THIS TIME, PLEASE? When you gotta go you GOTTA GO...EPA or no EPA! I think she was trying to look at my willie and figured, rightly, I'd turn around towards the screaming when I heard it.....I did, nearly peeing on Lloyd who was also peeing to lee! Why do men pee off a dock? BECAUSE WE CAN! |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Roger Long" wrote in
: If your state drops the ball on sending the necessary letter of tribute and submission to Washington, all recreational vessels with that state The last time the damned Yankees pulled this kind of crap, the Citadel Cadets in Ft Moultrie caused a helluva ruckus by firing the cannons on Ft Sumter, where the Yankee Army was holed up at the entrance to the harbor. We all know what happened then! Someone needs to remind Washington Bureaucrats the Citadel Cadets can STILL aim a big pounder pretty accurately and know how to use it! |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Thomas Flores" wrote in
: It could be turned into a jobs program. Think of all those good paying jobs for enforcement personnel and how good it would be for the economy. Do we have enough foreign government employees to cover all the boatramps?? |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:32:09 -0700, "claus" said: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. BoatUS is playing it for all the PR it's worth, but anyone with modest ability to read and think should realize that what the EPA has done by providing "automatic" and free licenses is to abolish any requirement for a license for vessels under 79 feet. It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Capt. JG" wrote
It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. You've hit the nail on the head. That is exactly where we are headed. A police state is one where anyone in a uniform can pull you in on a whim any time they feel like it. That can't be done here because we have this thing called a constitution. However, if you can get the public to accept all sorts of laws on the "Oh, they'll never bother enforcing that." basis, then the police can invoke them any time. Boaters are gradually making some progress in the anchoring battle that has been going on in Florida for years. What do you think the towns and police will do when they figure out that they have these EPA permit regulations to work with? 0400 There is the clomping of heavy boots on your deck. "It's been reported that a water discharge was seen coming from your boat. We're here to inspect your dish detergent and piping system. Ah, we see that you are using Joy instead of the best available non-phosphate brand. You've been anchored here two weeks. Your fine will be $384,000. Your EPA permit is now revoked and we are towing your boat to the nearest shipyard to be removed from the water." Nobody is going to enforce this stuff because they give a **** about water quality. It will be used like a lot of laws to pursue other agendas. It won't happen often and it won't be a significant risk to any individual boater, probably less than the hazards we routinely accept. But, doesn't it disturb people here to see this nation which is creating so much death and suffering in the name of "freedom" going down this path? This EPA stuff is just one example. -- Roger Long |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Roger Long" wrote in message ... "Capt. JG" wrote It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. You've hit the nail on the head. That is exactly where we are headed. A police state is one where anyone in a uniform can pull you in on a whim any time they feel like it. That can't be done here because we have this thing called a constitution. However, if you can get the public to accept all sorts of laws on the "Oh, they'll never bother enforcing that." basis, then the police can invoke them any time. Boaters are gradually making some progress in the anchoring battle that has been going on in Florida for years. What do you think the towns and police will do when they figure out that they have these EPA permit regulations to work with? 0400 There is the clomping of heavy boots on your deck. "It's been reported that a water discharge was seen coming from your boat. We're here to inspect your dish detergent and piping system. Ah, we see that you are using Joy instead of the best available non-phosphate brand. You've been anchored here two weeks. Your fine will be $384,000. Your EPA permit is now revoked and we are towing your boat to the nearest shipyard to be removed from the water." Nobody is going to enforce this stuff because they give a **** about water quality. It will be used like a lot of laws to pursue other agendas. It won't happen often and it won't be a significant risk to any individual boater, probably less than the hazards we routinely accept. But, doesn't it disturb people here to see this nation which is creating so much death and suffering in the name of "freedom" going down this path? This EPA stuff is just one example. -- Roger Long Law abiding citizens have nothing to fear. Can I see your free speech permit? |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. You've hit the nail on the head. That is exactly where we are headed. A police state is one where anyone in a uniform can pull you in on a whim any time they feel like it. That can't be done here because we have this thing called a constitution. However, if you can get the public to accept all sorts of laws on the "Oh, they'll never bother enforcing that." basis, then the police can invoke them any time. Boaters are gradually making some progress in the anchoring battle that has been going on in Florida for years. What do you think the towns and police will do when they figure out that they have these EPA permit regulations to work with? 0400 There is the clomping of heavy boots on your deck. "It's been reported that a water discharge was seen coming from your boat. We're here to inspect your dish detergent and piping system. Ah, we see that you are using Joy instead of the best available non-phosphate brand. You've been anchored here two weeks. Your fine will be $384,000. Your EPA permit is now revoked and we are towing your boat to the nearest shipyard to be removed from the water." Nobody is going to enforce this stuff because they give a **** about water quality. It will be used like a lot of laws to pursue other agendas. It won't happen often and it won't be a significant risk to any individual boater, probably less than the hazards we routinely accept. But, doesn't it disturb people here to see this nation which is creating so much death and suffering in the name of "freedom" going down this path? This EPA stuff is just one example. -- Roger Long I think we're a ways off from this, but it's a slippery slope. People tend to think, for example, that scum like terrorists should be hanged immediately or held indefinitely without a trial (e.g., gitmo), but this is the precipice of a very slippery slope that may start with good intentions and ends with jackboots. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Proposed Discharge Permits
In article lutions,
"Capt. JG" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:32:09 -0700, "claus" said: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. BoatUS is playing it for all the PR it's worth, but anyone with modest ability to read and think should realize that what the EPA has done by providing "automatic" and free licenses is to abolish any requirement for a license for vessels under 79 feet. It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. 'Not knowing the laws is no excuse for violating them' LOL -- Molesworth |
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Molesworth" wrote in message
... In article lutions, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:32:09 -0700, "claus" said: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. BoatUS is playing it for all the PR it's worth, but anyone with modest ability to read and think should realize that what the EPA has done by providing "automatic" and free licenses is to abolish any requirement for a license for vessels under 79 feet. It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. 'Not knowing the laws is no excuse for violating them' LOL -- Molesworth Almost funny, but not quite... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Proposed Discharge Permits
|
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Paul" wrote in message
... http://www.sitnews.us/0708news/07220...ngvessels.html Well, I guess I don't have to save my nickels... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Proposed Discharge Permits
|
Proposed Discharge Permits
"claus" wrote in message . .. New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. On September 30th, the EPA is scheduled to begin court-ordered enforcement of the Clean Water Act that controls all water discharged from boats during its normal operation. Recreational boaters had been exempt from it for 34 years because it was meant for large, ocean-going ships. Now, to comply with the law, the EPA has proposed permits for boaters; the permits are free and automatic. The EPA says boaters will be required to take "simple steps" to control water discharge from their boats, but didn't give me any details about how to do that. Congress acts: Recreational boaters won't have to follow strict clean air standards By Jim Morris Staff Writer Tuesday, July 22, 2008 In a remarkable display of bipartisan support for recreational boating, both the House and Senate today, July 22, passed S. 2766, "The Clean Boating Act of 2008" that will permanently restore a long-standing exemption for recreational boats from permitting requirements under the Clean Water Act. The legislation now goes to the White House for the President's signature. Congressional action was spawned by a U.S. District Court decision in September 2006 under which an estimated 17 million recreational boats would have fallen under Clean Water Act permit requirements effective Sept. 30, 2008. The permit would have dictated maintenance and operation procedures and potentially subjected boaters to citizen lawsuits as well as a penalty system designed for industrial polluters. "This is a fabulous victory for common sense and it just goes to show what can be done when the boating public, the marine industry and its representatives in Congress row together in a bipartisan way," said BoatU.S. President Nancy Michelman. BoatU.S. Government Affairs Director Margaret Podlich was quick to shower praise on a boatload of legislators who did much of the heavy lifting including Sens. Bill Nelson (D-FL) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Representatives Jim Oberstar (D-MN), Steve LaTourette (R-OH), Candice Miller (R-MI) and Gene Taylor (D-MS). A complete listing of all legislators involved will be available at http://www.BoatUS.com/gov soon. BoatU.S. has worked for more than a year with the National Marine Manufacturers Association and a broad coalition of stakeholders to resolve the problem before the permitting deadline. "One of the real keys to success here was our collective ability to activate the grassroots," said Podlich, noting that tens of thousands of letters and e-mails were generated by boaters and anglers over the course of the past 12 months. BoatU.S. is the nation's leading advocate for recreational boat owners with over 650,000 members. |
Proposed Discharge Permits
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:32:23 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote: It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. "Rules are made for the guidance of wise men and for the strict adherence by fools" - Anon Peter |
Proposed Discharge Permits
Nobody is going to enforce this stuff because they give a **** about water quality. It will be used like a lot of laws to pursue other agendas. It won't happen often and it won't be a significant risk to any individual boater, probably less than the hazards we routinely accept. But, doesn't it disturb people here to see this nation which is creating so much death and suffering in the name of "freedom" going down this path? This EPA stuff is just one example. -- Roger Long Law abiding citizens have nothing to fear. Can I see your free speech permit? The USA is not the only country to have freedom of speech enshrined in legislation. The 3 million people of the city state of Singapore also have it. There is one place where one can see it in action - Speaker's corner in a public park. Any citizen can obtain a permit to speak on any topic provided his written speech is submitted to authorities and approval as to the content authorised beforehand. A past leader of the opposition party was imprisoned for speaking without a permit. Peter. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com