"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:00:06 -0800, "Capt. JG"
Whatever. It's not worth the hassle...someone who uses Forte Agent and is
incapable of sending an email or filling out a form.

Consider it removed.



You're welcome! LOL

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:25:05 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:00:06 -0800, "Capt. JG"
Whatever. It's not worth the hassle...someone who uses Forte Agent and is
incapable of sending an email or filling out a form.

Consider it removed.



You're welcome! LOL

I see it has now gone. Thanks.

Now where is your apology for your lie stating that "I (you) know for
a fact that he emailed them to Roger". I asked both you and Roger
politely to remove the (stolen) pictures to no avail. You had no right
to them in the first place,so you were in no position to set
conditions for their removal.

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:25:05 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:00:06 -0800, "Capt. JG"
Whatever. It's not worth the hassle...someone who uses Forte Agent and
is
incapable of sending an email or filling out a form.

Consider it removed.



You're welcome! LOL

I see it has now gone. Thanks.

Now where is your apology for your lie stating that "I (you) know for
a fact that he emailed them to Roger". I asked both you and Roger
politely to remove the (stolen) pictures to no avail. You had no right
to them in the first place,so you were in no position to set
conditions for their removal.



1. Roger didn't steal anything.
2. There's no proof that they're yours.
3. I provided two removal methods, yet you chose to take a dump in public. I
don't call that polite.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:13:25 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:25:05 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:00:06 -0800, "Capt. JG"
Whatever. It's not worth the hassle...someone who uses Forte Agent and
is
incapable of sending an email or filling out a form.

Consider it removed.



You're welcome! LOL

I see it has now gone. Thanks.

Now where is your apology for your lie stating that "I (you) know for
a fact that he emailed them to Roger". I asked both you and Roger
politely to remove the (stolen) pictures to no avail. You had no right
to them in the first place,so you were in no position to set
conditions for their removal.



1. Roger didn't steal anything.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/steal
". To take (the property of another) without right or permission."

He took (the property of another) , I did not give permission. Case
closed!

The fact that the pictures may seem to have little value to others,
and that it is difficult to seek redress from wrongdoing on the
internet does not excuse this behaviour.

2. There's no proof that they're yours.

You, like Roger before, are calling me a liar.. You know what you can
do!

3. I provided two removal methods, yet you chose to take a dump in public. I
don't call that polite.

You should have complied with my reasonable request, without strings
or insults.

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:13:25 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:25:05 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:00:06 -0800, "Capt. JG"
Whatever. It's not worth the hassle...someone who uses Forte Agent and
is
incapable of sending an email or filling out a form.

Consider it removed.



You're welcome! LOL

I see it has now gone. Thanks.

Now where is your apology for your lie stating that "I (you) know for
a fact that he emailed them to Roger". I asked both you and Roger
politely to remove the (stolen) pictures to no avail. You had no right
to them in the first place,so you were in no position to set
conditions for their removal.



1. Roger didn't steal anything.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/steal
". To take (the property of another) without right or permission."

He took (the property of another) , I did not give permission. Case
closed!

Still don't see any proof. I know Roger. He doesn't steal. Don't know you.
Case closed!

The fact that the pictures may seem to have little value to others,
and that it is difficult to seek redress from wrongdoing on the
internet does not excuse this behaviour.

2. There's no proof that they're yours.

You, like Roger before, are calling me a liar.. You know what you can
do!

Nope. But feel free to keep claiming that.

3. I provided two removal methods, yet you chose to take a dump in public.
I
don't call that polite.

You should have complied with my reasonable request, without strings
or insults.

Why? Is it federal, state, local, household, dog house law? Never insulted
you and there were no strings.

You know what you can do! LOL

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote in
:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:25:05 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:00:06 -0800, "Capt. JG"
Whatever. It's not worth the
hassle...someone who uses Forte Agent and is incapable of sending an
email or filling out a form.

Consider it removed.



You're welcome! LOL

I see it has now gone. Thanks.

Now where is your apology for your lie stating that "I (you) know for
a fact that he emailed them to Roger". I asked both you and Roger
politely to remove the (stolen) pictures to no avail. You had no right
to them in the first place,so you were in no position to set
conditions for their removal.

I'm curious. Since you're in the photos, you're not their author/owner.
How are you claiming ownership of them?

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org

You, like Roger before, are calling me a liar.. You know what you can
do!

Nope. But feel free to keep claiming that.


I took all the pictures on my web space apart from a few of myself.

http://www.wareing77.plus.com/images/
http://www.wareing77.plus.com/movies/
http://www.wareing77.plus.com/Isle%20of%20Man%20trip/
http://www.wareing77.plus.com/Salamander/
http://www.wareing77.plus.com/Lymington%20trip/

If you need "proof" of what I say, then that is equivalent to saying
that I am lying.

Roger downloaded the pictures I indicated were of myself and my boat,
placed them on his website and retained them after I told him I had
not consented to this.

Why you should think that I do not own a 22ft. boat is beyond me.

I previously posted "proof" concerning the rubber boat.

I note that Roger makes much of the sheltered waters of Main but
thinks where I operate is a "bathtub".. He should try it in an ILB.

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...

You, like Roger before, are calling me a liar.. You know what you can
do!

Nope. But feel free to keep claiming that.


I took all the pictures on my web space apart from a few of myself.

http://www.wareing77.plus.com/images/
http://www.wareing77.plus.com/movies/
http://www.wareing77.plus.com/Isle%20of%20Man%20trip/
http://www.wareing77.plus.com/Salamander/
http://www.wareing77.plus.com/Lymington%20trip/

If you need "proof" of what I say, then that is equivalent to saying
that I am lying.

Not at all.

Proof: any factual evidence that helps to establish the truth of something
Lie: pretend with intent to deceive

Did you provide proof until now? No.
Did you lie previously? No.


Roger downloaded the pictures I indicated were of myself and my boat,
placed them on his website and retained them after I told him I had
not consented to this.

That's between you and Roger. So far, you've claimed quite loudly that he
stole your pictures, but you haven't provided much in the way of proof.

Why you should think that I do not own a 22ft. boat is beyond me.

?? Why should you think that I do or don't know or care is beyond me.

I previously posted "proof" concerning the rubber boat.

?? Rubber ducky?

I note that Roger makes much of the sheltered waters of Main but
thinks where I operate is a "bathtub".. He should try it in an ILB.

Take it up with him.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Geoff Schultz" wrote in message
.. .
Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote in
:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:25:05 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:00:06 -0800, "Capt. JG"
Whatever. It's not worth the
hassle...someone who uses Forte Agent and is incapable of sending an
email or filling out a form.

Consider it removed.



You're welcome! LOL

I see it has now gone. Thanks.

Now where is your apology for your lie stating that "I (you) know for
a fact that he emailed them to Roger". I asked both you and Roger
politely to remove the (stolen) pictures to no avail. You had no right
to them in the first place,so you were in no position to set
conditions for their removal.

I'm curious. Since you're in the photos, you're not their author/owner.
How are you claiming ownership of them?

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org


Hmmmm.... LOL Did he get permission to use them? I think we need some
documentary evidence!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:24:43 -0600, Geoff Schultz
wrote:


I'm curious. Since you're in the photos, you're not their author/owner.
How are you claiming ownership of them?

-- Geoff
www.GeoffSchultz.org

Good point. I was given one and stole the other. I believe the
photographers would consent to my use. One is a close personal friend
and the other probably
http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/mid/sites...n_martin.shtml
my Hon. Sec.. I made it clear that they were not for use on Roger's
website. I will delete them from public access.