push vs pull vis a vis rudders
Rodney Myrvaagnes wrote in message ... On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:20:59 +0100, "JimB" wrote: [snip] I'm trying to square Jax's flat 'nada' with rudder kick I've observed, and an impression that the rudder direction affects boat yaw when in reverse and not moving, [snip] I have observed the rudder kick in reverse, but only with the boat in motion. Does yours do this when tied to the dock? It did in two previous vessels I've skippered, both of which had big props a small distance from big rudders. Both also had tillers, so force feedback was not hidden by gearing. It wasn't big, but was apparent. JimB |
push vs pull vis a vis rudders
Steven Shelikoff wrote in message ... On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:20:59 +0100, "JimB" So I hung the spatula just behind the fan. Lo and behold, the same thing happens but just a little less. When I rotate the spatula to the left, there is a noticable *left* motion to the blade... i.e., it's not only drawn forward into the blade but it also moved to the left from where it was when the spatula blade was perpendicular to the fan. When I turn it to the right, the spatula swings to the right. Steve, that was the experiment I first did. Then I realised that, to yaw the boat, I had to look solely at lateral force. To do this I had to constrain the card so that it could only hinge laterally (no fore and aft motion permitted). This is where the bits of wire came in. The card had a bit of wire attached rigidy to the top, sticking at 45 deg horizontal angle to the card. The card end of the wire bent down to stop the card swinging around the wrong end of the wire. I hung the card (your spatula I guess!) through two loops (hinges) first mounted parallel to the centre line of the fan, then at right angles. This gave a different result, very little lateral swing, lots of fore and aft swing. Of course (a weakness in the experiment) it didn't check for any lateral force effects on the fan of changes in airflow, nor was it a very good representaion of relative sizes of prop and rudder. That proves to my satisfaction that if the rudder is close enough to the prop, it's direction will have some effect on the motion of the boat when you throw it in reverse even before the boat starts making sterway. My initial conclusion too, until I changed the hinging arrangement. JimB |
push vs pull vis a vis rudders
Steven Shelikoff wrote in message ... On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:20:59 +0100, "JimB" So I hung the spatula just behind the fan. Lo and behold, the same thing happens but just a little less. When I rotate the spatula to the left, there is a noticable *left* motion to the blade... i.e., it's not only drawn forward into the blade but it also moved to the left from where it was when the spatula blade was perpendicular to the fan. When I turn it to the right, the spatula swings to the right. Steve, that was the experiment I first did. Then I realised that, to yaw the boat, I had to look solely at lateral force. To do this I had to constrain the card so that it could only hinge laterally (no fore and aft motion permitted). This is where the bits of wire came in. The card had a bit of wire attached rigidy to the top, sticking at 45 deg horizontal angle to the card. The card end of the wire bent down to stop the card swinging around the wrong end of the wire. I hung the card (your spatula I guess!) through two loops (hinges) first mounted parallel to the centre line of the fan, then at right angles. This gave a different result, very little lateral swing, lots of fore and aft swing. Of course (a weakness in the experiment) it didn't check for any lateral force effects on the fan of changes in airflow, nor was it a very good representaion of relative sizes of prop and rudder. That proves to my satisfaction that if the rudder is close enough to the prop, it's direction will have some effect on the motion of the boat when you throw it in reverse even before the boat starts making sterway. My initial conclusion too, until I changed the hinging arrangement. JimB |
push vs pull vis a vis rudders
Brian Whatcott wrote in message ... On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:20:59 +0100, "JimB" wrote: .... Asking for explanations from experimental rigs is the royal road to progress. Congratulations! Limitations of the experiment: It didn't check for associated force changes at the fan The scale of 'rudder' against fan size is way out The wire had a little flexibility Fag ends produced smoke which rose too fast Reynolds numbers were wrong. And, just in case you mis-understood, my hinges were pendulum hinges which did not allow the 'rudder' to rotate around its vertical axis (except in the 'rudder kick' experiment). They only allowed pendulum movement laterally, or when re-oriented, fore and aft (subject to wire flexibility). If a hinge surface is hinged more than about 1/4 aft of its present leading edge it is unstable in the fluid flow. ('rudder kick') Agreed, and not necessarily a proof that there's a net force at right angles to the centreline of the boat (my earlier assumption) If a surface *is* hinged about 1/4 from the leading edge, it can still break into oscillations which are quickly destructive, unless the mass is balanced closer to the hinge line. Good old flutter. If a FLAT surface is inclined slightly ( 20 degrees) to the fluid flow, the flow over the 'upper' surface is faster and provides lower pressure than the flow over the lower surface. The streamlines do not follow the (flat) surface of the test article (of course!), they kick up in a smooth curve over the top. This applies to an airfoil flown upside down too. The streamlines look similar to the streamlines over a right way up foil, but less efficient and with lower pressure difference from top/bottom. If the foil is asymmetric. Agreed, though Jax seems to challenge the association of local water speed and pressure. I'll suck him in a bit further on that one. It is not necessary for a lump of fluid dividing past the foil to join up again after it has passed.. When providing lift, the lump of fluid does not join up again, in fact. We seem to agree on basic aerodynamics. I'm looking forward to hearing more about modern advanced fluid dynamics from Jax in the 'lift over foils' thread. Perhaps you can act as moderator? JimB |
push vs pull vis a vis rudders
Brian Whatcott wrote in message ... On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:20:59 +0100, "JimB" wrote: .... Asking for explanations from experimental rigs is the royal road to progress. Congratulations! Limitations of the experiment: It didn't check for associated force changes at the fan The scale of 'rudder' against fan size is way out The wire had a little flexibility Fag ends produced smoke which rose too fast Reynolds numbers were wrong. And, just in case you mis-understood, my hinges were pendulum hinges which did not allow the 'rudder' to rotate around its vertical axis (except in the 'rudder kick' experiment). They only allowed pendulum movement laterally, or when re-oriented, fore and aft (subject to wire flexibility). If a hinge surface is hinged more than about 1/4 aft of its present leading edge it is unstable in the fluid flow. ('rudder kick') Agreed, and not necessarily a proof that there's a net force at right angles to the centreline of the boat (my earlier assumption) If a surface *is* hinged about 1/4 from the leading edge, it can still break into oscillations which are quickly destructive, unless the mass is balanced closer to the hinge line. Good old flutter. If a FLAT surface is inclined slightly ( 20 degrees) to the fluid flow, the flow over the 'upper' surface is faster and provides lower pressure than the flow over the lower surface. The streamlines do not follow the (flat) surface of the test article (of course!), they kick up in a smooth curve over the top. This applies to an airfoil flown upside down too. The streamlines look similar to the streamlines over a right way up foil, but less efficient and with lower pressure difference from top/bottom. If the foil is asymmetric. Agreed, though Jax seems to challenge the association of local water speed and pressure. I'll suck him in a bit further on that one. It is not necessary for a lump of fluid dividing past the foil to join up again after it has passed.. When providing lift, the lump of fluid does not join up again, in fact. We seem to agree on basic aerodynamics. I'm looking forward to hearing more about modern advanced fluid dynamics from Jax in the 'lift over foils' thread. Perhaps you can act as moderator? JimB |
push vs pull vis a vis rudders
Expert is a relative term. Compared to the majority of this news
group, he is a profesional expert in fluid flow. Different types of fluid flow compared to those you were thinking of, maybe. I speculate; hydraulics perhaps? A mere tool to him? self-proclaimed "expert" or not, he made statements to this group as fact that were not fact. And he did it from the get-go in a fashion to tell one and all he was b/sing. he is an electrical engineer by training, training he received in the later 1960's in a country with more sheep than people. in an email to me he tried to justify his stance by saying something to effect that the friction in the rudder bearing made the difference. I suspect the good professor had something to contribute, but he claim b/sing, so much I so I figureed someone hijacked his email address and he didn't know. |
push vs pull vis a vis rudders
Expert is a relative term. Compared to the majority of this news
group, he is a profesional expert in fluid flow. Different types of fluid flow compared to those you were thinking of, maybe. I speculate; hydraulics perhaps? A mere tool to him? self-proclaimed "expert" or not, he made statements to this group as fact that were not fact. And he did it from the get-go in a fashion to tell one and all he was b/sing. he is an electrical engineer by training, training he received in the later 1960's in a country with more sheep than people. in an email to me he tried to justify his stance by saying something to effect that the friction in the rudder bearing made the difference. I suspect the good professor had something to contribute, but he claim b/sing, so much I so I figureed someone hijacked his email address and he didn't know. |
push vs pull vis a vis rudders
|
push vs pull vis a vis rudders
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com