Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
32 feet is a sweet spot in smaller cruising sailboats. It's about the
minimum size in which you can get full headroom without excessive freeboard and cabin height, odd proportions, or no bilge. The waterline length is getting long enough for reasonable speed and a rigid dinghy will often fit on deck somewhere although usually on the foredeck. However, I think it is probably the absolute minimum size for most couples to live aboard full time if it is of normal, post WWII, proportions. You might want to take a look at the website for my 32 foot Endeavour: http://home.maine.rr.com/rlma/Boat.htm These are great and underappreciated boats. Very comfortable, reasonable turn of speed, driest boat I ever sailed, great handling characteristics if you like a nimble and quick turning boat. Many boats this maneuvarable have control problems when over pressed and driven hard but, as long as you keep the speed up, the E32 will nearly always do what you need her to do. The construction is an odd mix, lots of wood and nice visual detail but clearly built for low cost in a yard were the crew was kept happy with unlimited ganja. Construction is crude and heavy but solid with no core in critical places to require expensive and difficult replacement 3 decades later. The interior and cockpit are very intelligently laid out. I bought mine when I was looking for a cheap boat and thought it would be used primarily for daysailing and weekends. I then discovered a greatly renewed interest in sailing and cruising and discovered that I had gotten a great boat. You could do worse than picking up one of these put plan on putting about 1.5 times the purchase price into it. If you are downgrading from the trawler you describe, you can probably buy a higher quality and more expensive boat but money in the bank is freedom. I like the E32's characteristics so much that there are few 32 - 34 foot boats I would trade her for just to get higher quality and better reputation. -- Roger Long |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:56:04 -0400, "Roger Long"
wrote: The construction is an odd mix, lots of wood and nice visual detail but clearly built for low cost in a yard were the crew was kept happy with unlimited ganja. Still finding them butts, eh? --Vic |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Vic Smith" wrote
Still finding them butts, eh? No, they must have vacuumed pretty well ![]() It's the almost total lack of any true 90 degree angles in the otherwise nicely fitted cabin joinerwork and stuff like that. I took off some of the deck liners which are a Naugahide like fabric stabled over plywood. The staples on the pack side were about 1/8" apart. You could just see how some poor soul got a job away from the resin fumes and was going to make it last a long as possible. The staples go alonglike that for a couple of panels at this improbable spacing and you can see where the supervisor came in and screamed at him because they suddenly start running at about 1 1/2 inch intervals. I've gotten used to the lack of symmetry and funny angles. It gives the boat a homey "built by Hobbits" character. It's still the nicest interior I've seen in a glass boat in that price range. -- Roger Long |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-06-24 15:48:14 -0400, "Roger Long" said:
"Vic Smith" wrote Still finding them butts, eh? No, they must have vacuumed pretty well ![]() It's the almost total lack of any true 90 degree angles in the otherwise nicely fitted cabin joinerwork and stuff like that. Oh gawd, there ain't more than a dozen 90-degree angles on Xan. Should have seen me measure and remeasure both sides of the bulkheads I was replacing. I couldn't believe the hull could flare that much in 3/4". I believe most of the non-90 is because they needed to have the flair to get the molded parts out of the molds. I don't believe any of the vertical panels other than the main bulkhead are actually square to the sole, though the difference is subtle. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-06-24 12:56:04 -0400, "Roger Long" said:
If you are downgrading from the trawler you describe, you can probably buy a higher quality and more expensive boat but money in the bank is freedom. Yup! A small boat and a bag of cash will beat one tied to the bank every time. I like the E32's characteristics so much that there are few 32 - 34 foot boats I would trade her for just to get higher quality and better reputation. Similar for us, except that exactly one 34' boat that we've boarded had improved livability, but it's quality sucked. Other than that, the boats that were a significant upgrade were at least 37', and significant money. We have preferred to accumulate the cash instead of being tied to the bankers. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The cost of boating just went up. Gas hits all-time high. | General | |||
High Quality RF Connectors, Adapters & Cable Assemblies @ Low Cost | Electronics | |||
Coax Connectors & Adapters - High Quality@ Low Cost | Electronics | |||
OT--But I thought Bush's tax cut is responsible for the high cost of oil? | General | |||
fishing while cruising high sea on a 25' sailing boat | Cruising |