Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
On 2008-06-08 13:35:54 -0400, Bruce in alaska said:
Must be a USCG Training Base for SAR or something. Up here in Alaska, those conditions are called "FLAT CALM".... We don't even broadcast Wx Alerts till the Winds are over 40 KPH, or the Seas are bigger than 10 Ft. Double that for the Bering Sea..... Gulf Coast Sailers must be pussies, wossies, or some sort of Limp Wristed Mammals..... Local conditions matter greatly. I've enjoyed romps in the Atlantic in 6-8' waves over 8' swells, some of the greatest sailing I've experienced, but anything over 3' on the Chesapeake can be life-threatening where the depth is in the 8-12' range. Those waves are steep and come in rapidly with significant force. "Washing Machine" starts describing the conditions, but until you've experienced them, you really can't understand. Sailors who have survived hurricanes at sea have been seriously spooked by our fairly-usual summer squall lines. Luckily, they're usually short duration, under an hour, but during that time, you're under extreme conditions that will stress the most prepared and professional sailors. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#12
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
I certainly wish them well. The sea is a dangerous place. Sounds like the
keel ballast fell off, if they found the boat upside down. Perhap another example of stainless used incorrectly? Steve wrote in message ... Let's hope they are in the raft. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5825012.html By JENNIFER LEAHY Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle "A sailboat participating in the Regata de Amigos race from Galveston to Veracruz was found capsized 11 miles south of Matagorda Saturday morning. All six aboard the 38-foot sailboat Cynthia Woods, a Cape Fear 38R, are missing. The missing are four students from Texas A&M-Galveston and two university staff members, the school said. "All aboard are experienced mariners and two are safety instructors," said U.S. Coast Guard Petty Officer Renee C. Aiello, who noted that there was an inflatable raft on the sailboat. Participants in the Regata de Amigos, a 630-nautical mile race, left Galveston on Friday at about 2 p.m. The Coast Guard received a phone call at 8:15 Saturday morning from the emergency contact for the sailboat who said they lost communication with the sailboat at approximately midnight. The sailboat also missed its 8 a.m. radio check. A Falcon jet crew located the empty sailboat and a search is under way for the six missing people." Fred |
#13
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
"Scott Sexton" wrote
Send out some prayers/good thoughts, they'll need them. "Roger Long" wrote: They sure will. If the later information that the boat lost its keel is correct, the prognosis is very grim. Keel failure is the worst case scenario, as sudden, unpredictable, and difficult to manage as a wing breaking off an aircraft. This was an almost-new boat. IIRC it is ~2 years old and donated to the university sailing program last year. There are a lot of problems with interenal encapsulated ballast keels but I sure appreciate not worrying about 38 year old keel bolts when I'm out in the dark. 38 YO keel bolats can be pulled & replaced. Have you considered adding a layer or two of glass over you keel, especially around the more- highly-stressed garboard area? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#14
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
"Roger Long" wrote:
I don't have keel bolts. Yes, I gathered that when you said you had an encapsulated keel ... My ballast is encapsulated (see my post on encapsulation). I did My suggestion that "38 year old keel bolts can be replaced" was a suggestion that it is needless to worry about keelbolts even if you have them. Yes keel bolts can be replaced and should be. If they are replaced because X-ray shows that they are necked down and need replacement, there is a good chance they will break off at the keel/hull joint and then you'll be faced with drilling new ones. Yep. Is major PITA ... The best tactic is to replace them frequently while sound enough to be pulled but almost no one does that. Stainless steel keel bolts are death. How about Monel? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#15
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:10:39 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
.... Stainless steel keel bolts are death. How about Monel? Fresh Breezes- Doug King Durable, if you can pay the $$$s Brian W |
#16
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
"Richard Casady" wrote in message ... On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:38:04 -0700 (PDT), wrote: "A sailboat participating in the Regata de Amigos race from Galveston to Veracruz was found capsized 11 miles south of Matagorda Saturday morning. Amazing thing is that it didn't sink. I am sure it would have, had there been much in the way of waves. Casady A yacht called Moquini, a Fast 42, lost its keel just south of Madagascar a couple of years ago. It was found several months later about 500 nm off the South African coast. Uupside down with a huge hole where the keel had dropped off, but very much afloat. It had drifted about 800 nm. Sadly, the crew was never found. http://www.sailr.com/news35939.html J |
#17
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
On Jun 10, 8:44*am, wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:19:44 -0400, "Roger Long" wrote: I can tell that you are not an engineer. *Are you familiar with those pictures of stainless steel shafts that have had a rubber band put around them and immersed in salt water? *That's what can happen at the keel hull joint if it is not kept watertight and there is no joint on a boat harder to keep tight. Do you have any good tips on how to keep the dust bunnies out of my bilge? If I could keep out the dust bunnies, I'd feel more comfortable about storing fresh bread wrapped in a paper napkin down there. Just out of curiosity, what kind of boat are we talking about here? *I haven't seen many bolted keel installations with structural glass backup. I don't think of the epoxy/glass as "backup". It was also not original to the boat when manufactured. The keel is held on three ways. There are 6 bolts. The keel is bonded to the stub with 3m5200, and the outside is wrapped and epoxied. You can remove the bolts and the fiberglass and still have a very hard time removing the keel. I tend to think of all three elements as backup for each other. No single one alone would be enough to satisfy me that it was secure. If it really is structural as you say, stainless steel bolts would be OK but there would also be no reason not to use plain double dipped galvanized with cast iron or bronze with lead. They used what they used. Who knows why... BTW, I have nothing against bolted keels and have designed a few myself. I'd probably use a bolted keel if built a new boat for myself. * But, but... You said they were DEATH! When buying a 28 year old boat with a poorly documented maintenance history like I did, it's nice to have encapsulated ballast. You are right that keel failures are rare but few people drive their boats hard. Here's an email to someone about how my wife and I spent this past Sunday afternoon: We had quite an adventure yesterday (6/8/2008)on the Long Island Sound. We got caught out in a line of severe thunder storms. Boat got knocked down twice while under bare poles. From the time we saw the threatening line on the horizon, to when it hit us was less than a half hour. I knew what I was looking at, and wasted no time getting as prepared as possible. We immediately doused sails, donned PFD's, clipped on, and secured everything possible. We were too far out to make it into any port. Once it hit, trying to get into anywhere for shelter would have been a deadly mistake. Horizontal rain so hard it burned as it hit. I couldn't see the GPS and RADAR just inches in front of my face. Wind gusts were in the 70+ mph range. Maybe higher. This was later confirmed by another sailor who encountered parts of the same storm 30 miles west of my position. His max windspeed reading was over 57 knots. My wife reported to me during a discussion afterwards that at one point she had the odd sensation of very hot air blowing on one shoulder and cold air blowing on the other at the same time. I'd guess that means we were experiencing wind sheer, and were directly in it. It takes an awful lot of wind power to knock this boat over sideways with no sails up. Whenever there was a slight diminishment, and I regained some steering ability, I headed straight out to give me more room for the periods when we were taken wherever the wind wanted us to go. VHF radio announcement by the CG that it was coming didn't commence until maybe a few minutes after the first rain had already hit us. They were also way off about how hard the gusts were inside the cells. It was actually a string of cells. We encountered two of them, the second being worse than the first. That's when we got knocked down. There was no way to escape them at 5 knots. I could see them clearly on the RADAR. They came rolling up the Sound like that famous stone ball in Indiana Jones, except there was a bunch of them. One person was killed by lightning and several injured on a beach just a few miles northeast of our position at Hammonassett Beach. They were under a pavilion. Heard panicked pan-pans and maydays on the radio during lulls when I could hear it at all. Haven't seen any reports yet of boats sinking or on the rocks, but it wouldn't surprise me. Some small boats may not be reported missing until someone on land realizes they didn't show up for work or whatever. In over 45 years of sailing on the LIS, I've been caught in some bad weather before, but this was exceptional. Taking half a day off today to go down, dry out the sails better, and and straighten out the boat. Racing boats usually become uncompeditive long before keel bolts reach a critical age. *When you sail hard, as I do, the rig is enough to worry about. *Not having to think about keel bolts, even not a statistically significant worry, just makes watching the boat working hard a bit more enjoyable. I apparently stress test my boat occasionally as well. :') Keel bolts was something I didn't worry about at all. Nice story salty, thanks for sharing. What were sea conditions like? Fred |
#18
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
On Jun 10, 4:19 am, "Roger Long" wrote:
.... You are right that keel failures are rare but few people drive their boats hard. Racing boats usually become uncompeditive long before keel bolts reach a critical age. When you sail hard, as I do, the rig is enough to worry about. ... Well, folks have been bolting ballast to the outside of keels on a regular basis since like the 19th century. Many boats with external ballast have been driven very hard even in their old age. The retired IOR racer is a popular class of cruising boat on the Pacific circuit. Bolt on fin keels are the norm for them. Folks run them aground, sail them in the Souther Ocean and the like. You sail your boat hard, but trust me, lots of other folks sail their boats at least as hard and put many more hours on them. For instance, I recently got an note from a couple who are heading back up to the islands after their seventh trip to Tasmania (that's 14 crossings of the Bass Straight). They've been cruising their old IOR warhorse hard in tough conditions many weeks a year for 20 plus years. They're both ex-racers and they always push pretty hard. It just so happens that they are friends of mine so I'm aware of what they do, but there are hundreds of other folks out there quietly doing similarly hard sailing. AFIK, catastrophic keel bolt failure is very rare. I know of many more rig failures and injuries and deaths resulting from them than keel failures. Not having to think about keel bolts, even not a statistically significant worry, just makes watching the boat working hard a bit more enjoyable. Which is cool. But it's kind of like saying, "I wont drive a front wheel drive car because CV joints are prone to failure and I don't want to have to worry about that..." That's aesthetics not risk analysis. -- Tom. |
#19
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
On Jun 10, 5:26 am, "Roger Long" wrote:
.... ... I seen enough "easy riders" that I'm sure it skews the keel failure statistics to the point that they are not a true reflection of the fleet wide state of keel bolts. ... Fair enough. I don't know that anyone is keeping score and I'm not sure that the population of keel bolt failures is big enough to produce meaningful statistics any case. Unless you are in the insurance business, it's only the condition of the bolts of the boat you are on that are important. ... Hmmm... I can't agree with that, but for sure the only one's you're likely to be able to do anything about are your own. -- Tom. |
#20
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Aggies Lost at Sea?
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:39:40 -0400, "Roger Long"
wrote: The oxygen in this region of stagnant water was not replenished fast enough to keep the surface of the stainless intact and crevice corrosion started. I have a text published by Babcock and Wilcox titled 'Steam'. I got the impression reading it that boiler water should be oxygen free. The things are made of plain carbon steel. Casady |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Subs lost on patrol: 1943 USS Herring lost 1944.jpg 86230 bytes | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Subs lost on patrol: 1943 USS Grayback lost 1944.jpg 70885 bytes | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Subs lost on patrol: 1943 USS Escolar lost 1944.jpg 210801 bytes | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Subs lost on patrol: 1942 USS Wahoo lost 1943.jpg 95425 bytes | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Subs lost on patrol: 1942 USS Trout lost 1944.jpg 167093 bytes | Tall Ship Photos |