| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
|
Marty wrote:
the motor is still inboard of a line parallel to the keel and projected aft from the widest beam. PhantMan wrote: I have a Penobscot 16. It's fast but it's narrow with a rounded bottom and primary stability isn't its strong point. Martin Baxter Which is a good reason not to try to put too much horsepower on the thing, the average paddler is unlikely to be able to exert more about one eighth of a horsepower, put 16 times that on your canoe and you can understand the need for prudence. I completely agreee. That's why I'm thinkin' 30lb - 50lb trolling motor. I'm only curious about how my canoe would handle the weight of an outboard, not the horsepower. No question that even 1hp would be more than enough. How stable is your canoe? Wide beam? Flat bottom? Mine has neither. Rick |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6 | General | |||
| Suzuki 2hp Tell Tale | General | |||
| 200 hp Suzuki | General | |||
| 150 HP Suzuki | General | |||
| FS: Suzuki 15 HP 4-stroke in NC | Marketplace | |||